Hi Mark, I’m really looking forward to reading or listening to your analysis about the idea that beside use of DEWs from space (I’m quite positive they are using satellites), but most of all they used the DEWs from space to create the holes and also holograms. I think my previous message could have sparkled your decision to explain your point. I think is a topic that has a bit left aside but it is now a good occasion to have some deeper thought. So, looking forward to read your discoveries and thoughts, thank you. Raul
Many thanks for sending me your analysis. Very interesting indeed. We are both on the same page to some degree. Please keep me in formed as my messages don't always make it through to me. When I do an update I will mention your analysis, and make it available for people to read.
It wasnt space based. It was hurricane erin being used like a tv broadcast signal antenna. Planes were recoded lightning bolts. Listen to lightning storms and compare to planes hitting towers. Then the towers were hit with recoded or redirected cold front on morning of sept 11 into a snowstorm or blizzard that was the towers coming down. It wasnt dust it was snow and ice. Compare ice glaciers crashing or snowballs surging down a mountain for exact sounds.
It was directed energy or weaponized snow and ice. Take a look at the "dust" rising off the ground after towers fell and compare to freezing cold temperatues in artic conditions. Similar effects.
Actually not - It seems you've never bothered to read Dr Judy Wood's book now, have you?
US NAVY Dustification Patent
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
Oh really. I tweeted BoeingDefense on twitter calling them out for Hurricane Erin being the weapon. I got my X account restricted. You try it too. See what happens.
I wish more people were like Mark Conlon. Brave enough to tell us what you really think happened as of right now. Humble enough to never close yourself off to new information. Humble enough to admit what you got wrong in the past. Basically you are an honest guy and that is rare these days. I loved this update!
Hurricane Erin was the weapon. The planes that were used was NASA ER-2, P-3 Orion and Global Hawk. They dropped AVIRIS infrared imaging technology into the eye of Erin to direct and control the weather weapon. Compare the plane sounds hitting the towers to Thunder and lightning. I believe lightning bolts which are Electricial Energy (electromagnetism wave) were the recoded to turn them into planes using AVIRIS. Then since there was a cold front coming in from the west coast meeting hurricane erin we got the switch up Erin moved north after planes hit so cold front was redirected south and we got the towers turned to snow. Compare snow glaciers collapsing or snowballs surging down mountains to towers falling. Same sounds. Erin was the weapon hence all the misdirection and ignoring of the weather on 911.
Actually not - It seems you've never bothered to read Dr Judy Wood's book now, have you?
US NAVY Dustification Patent
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
You are still unable to give a straight answer to have a debate? You say all that crap in your comments, yet have been Subscribed to my Substack blog since May 2025. I couldn't think of anything more unhinged than subscribing to a Substack blog that you reflect in YOUR comments.
Don't be shy Aidan, come and have a chat face to face, and debate the evidence. Yes or No?
Aidan, your comment is laughable, when you are the one attacking me, and trolling my Substack? Plus you would know if you read my Substack that I have many articles discrediting the official narrative regarding the planes etc.
It is very telling that you are avoiding a face to face discussion of the evidence, and not able to answer a Yes or No question to my invite to a debate? Why are you so yellow?
Your comments come across as though you are a very unhinged individual?
I will ask you again. Do you want to have a friendly debate? Yes or No?
Are you projecting regarding your remote controlled plane mumbo jumbo?
So, you not confident enough in your research to defend it in an evidence based discussion?
Is that what you are implying Aidan?
Come on.... If your research is so steadfast, you'll easily be able to make your case...
I'd love it if you could come and explain your position of remote controlled planes, vs the Qui-Tam whistleblower case, filed in 2007, by Dr Morgan Reynolds and especially the contents of the affidavit by John Lear...
John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966.
He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011. In short - He knows WTF he's talking about.
She see's through your colleagues over at the International Center For 9/11 Justice, who are leading a campaign of truth suppression.
Never forget, she was around in search of the truth long before you, and for you to insult her is disgraceful. You need to get your facts straight with Patricia, as she was not exploited, as she appreciated Norman's work. That is how contact began. So do please do your homework, before making things up in your head. You really are showing that you are unhinged.
You have been very vocal, yet still unable to answer a simple yes or no question to have a debate? Is proven liar Richard Gage pulling your strings?
Well you are being unhinged with the way you have been conducting yourself with your comments, on top of the fact that you can't even say YES or No to a closed simple question. What would you think?
So you going to answer my question or not, or you going to continue avoiding it?
It would be friendly discussion from my end, and not an argument or adhom fest. Hopefully the same from you.
Eitherway, perhaps there are areas we would agree on, and some we don't.
From your response/evaluation of Patricia Casazza you stated, “ Congratulations with your successful deception of and exploitation of someone still psychologically coping with the aftermath of 9/11 (Casazza).” Aidan Monaghan, are you now a professional psychologist able to diagnose someone in a chat room saying Patricia Casazza is “psychologically coping” 24 years after a traumatic event. I listened to Norman’s very long interview with Patricia Casazza and was amazed with her fortitude and her knowledge base concerning the empirical evidence she now elaborates on. Your professional psychiatric analysis of Patricia Casazza has more to do with your attitude. Just because she came to different conclusions than you based on her research, and the fact that she has a copy of Dr Judy Wood’s book and has read it doesn’t give you any authority to analyze Patricia Casazza’s present psychological condition.
I totally agree with your comment Matthew. Aidan has shown his true colours with his comments. An utter coward to face me in a discussion, yet makes adhoms and smearing Patricia. Well I am a former Psychotherapist, and I can say from what I have observed, Patricia is in a fit place to discern the evidence. If anyone has presented as unhinged it is Aidan.
What a thorough researcher you make. A researcher that cannot do research, aka reading.
If you did do some reading and if you listened to our 5h discussion of what she's been witnessing over the last 24 years, is the half truths being sold by people like you and other "bastions of truth."
You really should apply yourself and familiarize yourself with Patricia's position on what the destructive mechanism on 9/11 was and especially what was captured in Manhattan's skies.
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Then, let's address your ad hominem of "The Death Star Did 9/11".
We all know Steven E. Jones started that strawman, just like he did with calling Pons and Fleischman's work "cold fusion", back in 1989 and also how he caused the end of their careers - I suggest reading Dr Eugene Mallove's book, Fire from Ice, where he mentions Jones over 300 times, for the scientific fraud of Jones. You see Aidan, that's more reading, aka research.
Initially in 2012, most people weren’t familiar with the concept of DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), so you had to find a way to get people’s attention…
So, Dr Wood wrote a paper, called “Star Wars Beam Weapons” and whenever you have people criticizing her work, just go to her FAQ page, to answer all the silly questions. Link: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/faq/
Why was “Star Wars Beam Weapons” used as the title for that paper?
This term was used because it is a familiar term that has been used over the last 20+ years to describe weaponry under development as part of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).
Since little is known about the technology specifically, though numerous articles and Defense websites describe its existence, plus the fact that hundreds of billions of dollars have been channeled to research in this area, it is reasonable to expect that tremendous advances have been made in technology over the past 50 years since microwaves and lasers were first developed.
The title was later changed to “Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW), (brought to you by the Star Wars Program)”.
The other popular straw man distraction term used is “Space Beams” so again, let us go to the FAQ explanation…
Is your “space beam” hypothesis testable?
First of all, I have never used the term “space beams.” It is a derogatory term used to distract folks away from looking at the real evidence.
The term was first coined by physicist Steven E. Jones within days of my first posting an article suggesting a high-tech energy weapon was used to destroy the WTC. It has been speculated that the purpose of using this name was to mock the hypothesis that unconventional methods were used to destroy the WTC.
At this point, it has not been determined exactly what weapon was used, but the general category of what was used is fairly clear. The visual data as well as the issues related to the bathtub fragility and ground shaking eliminate the conventional demolition methods that have been proposed to date. The buildings “floated” to the ground as dust.
So, is this hypothesis testable? Yes!
And each of the phenomena identified at the WTC complex on 9/11 has been reproduced in a lab.
This may or may not be the exact same way of creating the effects, but it is the same mechanism.
I suggest everyone reading this comment goes through the FAQ page as you will then see how easy it was to refute Gage’s and architects for an engineered truth’s game in 2008 already.
You finally made it? Nice to know you have been a subscriber to ME since May 2025, with a 5 star rating in my stats, yet according to you I am putting out "unscientific disinformation". Why would you subscribe to someone putting out "unscientific disinformation"? What does this say about you? Perhaps your perception of what is possible outside of your myopic perception of science is very telling?
I see you are still pushing your "remote controlled planes" nonsense? Now if there was disinformation, I think this takes first prize.
How about you having a debate with me on the 4 planes telemetry data? Let's discuss the ACARS data or DCC radar? You can bring all your buddies along too like Dr. Piers Robinson, Richard Gage, David Chandler and Ted Walter if you like?
We know what you guys are up to over at the International Center For 9/11 Justice, with your disinformation campaigns.
Perhaps we can discuss how the wings on your remote controlled plane keep disappeared and reappearing in the videos? Perhaps you can inform me why I am wrong? How about it Aidan, you up for a debate?
Let me know regarding the debate invite, I would look forward to asking you some questions face-to-face about your BS remote controlled planes theories. Bring along Captain Dan while you are at it. My friend Norman (9/11 Revisionist) pulled him up on X (twitter), why he doesn't want to discuss the ACARS data? Very strange he and you and your crowd avoid it?
Don't avoid the question, are you going to have a debate? Simple yes or no answer and you are struggling to say? Like Norman said, put your money where your mouth is. Don't be shy. You can bring your buddies too. Very strange you don't know the difference between a hologram and 3D volumetric projection. Perhaps I could educate you.
None of these guys have the intellectual humility to have a face to face discussion, as they KNOW that they will be exposed for their half truths they sell...
Keep an eye out for my discussion with Richard G. Ellefritz - assistant professor of sociology, at the University of The Bahamas, as we discuss the 9/11 "truth" movement and the disingenuousness of the talking heads in the movement...
Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement?
Aidan sounds like he is just a troll. He ridicules instead of making an argument. He calls people names instead of offering evidence or his opinion. Basically he sounds like a coward. Forget him
Exactly, he was straight off the mark with adhoms, rather than engaging. Yes, he's a coward, as he will not meet on Zoom to discuss his position, happy to be a troll in the comments.
I'd love it if you could come and explain your position of remote controlled planes, vs the Qui-Tam whistleblower case, filed in 2007, by Dr Morgan Reynolds and especially the contents of the affidavit by John Lear...
John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966.
He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011. In short - He knows WTF he's talking about.
God Bless You, my friend.
Thank you Rip.
Hi Mark, I’m really looking forward to reading or listening to your analysis about the idea that beside use of DEWs from space (I’m quite positive they are using satellites), but most of all they used the DEWs from space to create the holes and also holograms. I think my previous message could have sparkled your decision to explain your point. I think is a topic that has a bit left aside but it is now a good occasion to have some deeper thought. So, looking forward to read your discoveries and thoughts, thank you. Raul
Hi Raul,
Many thanks for sending me your analysis. Very interesting indeed. We are both on the same page to some degree. Please keep me in formed as my messages don't always make it through to me. When I do an update I will mention your analysis, and make it available for people to read.
Much respect to you!
Mark.
Hi Mark,
Thank you, I will.
That's great, I also sent it to Math (Easy Solutions).
Keep on investigating, that's very, very important,
Raul
It wasnt space based. It was hurricane erin being used like a tv broadcast signal antenna. Planes were recoded lightning bolts. Listen to lightning storms and compare to planes hitting towers. Then the towers were hit with recoded or redirected cold front on morning of sept 11 into a snowstorm or blizzard that was the towers coming down. It wasnt dust it was snow and ice. Compare ice glaciers crashing or snowballs surging down a mountain for exact sounds.
Hi, snow and ice melt on the ground, that did not happen, so I think you should rethink with a "colder" mind, but thanks for the suggestion.
It was directed energy or weaponized snow and ice. Take a look at the "dust" rising off the ground after towers fell and compare to freezing cold temperatues in artic conditions. Similar effects.
Actually not - It seems you've never bothered to read Dr Judy Wood's book now, have you?
US NAVY Dustification Patent
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v70cfss-us-navy-dustification-patent.html
Oh and btw, Hurricanes and Tornadoes are Telekinesis and Pyrokinesis, bitch.
Insults are the last resort of an insecure people trying to appear confident…
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
Read Dr Wood’s book, pages 349 to 451: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Oh really. I tweeted BoeingDefense on twitter calling them out for Hurricane Erin being the weapon. I got my X account restricted. You try it too. See what happens.
Step 1 - Do some reading…
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Hurricanes and September 11, 2001?
What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001
I wish more people were like Mark Conlon. Brave enough to tell us what you really think happened as of right now. Humble enough to never close yourself off to new information. Humble enough to admit what you got wrong in the past. Basically you are an honest guy and that is rare these days. I loved this update!
Many thanks for your kind words Geofry. I truly appreciate it.
Suggested reading...
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
Hurricane Erin was the weapon. The planes that were used was NASA ER-2, P-3 Orion and Global Hawk. They dropped AVIRIS infrared imaging technology into the eye of Erin to direct and control the weather weapon. Compare the plane sounds hitting the towers to Thunder and lightning. I believe lightning bolts which are Electricial Energy (electromagnetism wave) were the recoded to turn them into planes using AVIRIS. Then since there was a cold front coming in from the west coast meeting hurricane erin we got the switch up Erin moved north after planes hit so cold front was redirected south and we got the towers turned to snow. Compare snow glaciers collapsing or snowballs surging down mountains to towers falling. Same sounds. Erin was the weapon hence all the misdirection and ignoring of the weather on 911.
Actually not - It seems you've never bothered to read Dr Judy Wood's book now, have you?
US NAVY Dustification Patent
Bob Greenyer, from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion"), the Hutchison Effect and how his research explains the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11.
Video clip: https://rumble.com/v70cfss-us-navy-dustification-patent.html
I've got 5D Technology to build. Pyrokinesis and Telekinesis. I ain't wasting any more time with you. The future is 5D.
Aidan,
You are still unable to give a straight answer to have a debate? You say all that crap in your comments, yet have been Subscribed to my Substack blog since May 2025. I couldn't think of anything more unhinged than subscribing to a Substack blog that you reflect in YOUR comments.
Don't be shy Aidan, come and have a chat face to face, and debate the evidence. Yes or No?
Aidan, your comment is laughable, when you are the one attacking me, and trolling my Substack? Plus you would know if you read my Substack that I have many articles discrediting the official narrative regarding the planes etc.
It is very telling that you are avoiding a face to face discussion of the evidence, and not able to answer a Yes or No question to my invite to a debate? Why are you so yellow?
Your comments come across as though you are a very unhinged individual?
I will ask you again. Do you want to have a friendly debate? Yes or No?
Looks like someone had his nerve struck.
Indeed so Matthew.
Mr Naus, maybe Ol Aiden needs to listen to our discussion...
Vietnam Veteran & 9/11 Activism
A first hand experience with many 9/11 controlled opposition gatekeepers
Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/vietnam-veteran-and-911-activism
Are you projecting regarding your remote controlled plane mumbo jumbo?
So, you not confident enough in your research to defend it in an evidence based discussion?
Is that what you are implying Aidan?
Come on.... If your research is so steadfast, you'll easily be able to make your case...
I'd love it if you could come and explain your position of remote controlled planes, vs the Qui-Tam whistleblower case, filed in 2007, by Dr Morgan Reynolds and especially the contents of the affidavit by John Lear...
John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966.
He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011. In short - He knows WTF he's talking about.
2007 Court filings by Dr Morgan Reynolds against NIST: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Why the remote takeover of planes on 9/11 is IMPOSSIBLE
Avionics technician exposes the impossibilities of remotely taking-over a commercial aircraft way back in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/why-the-remote-takeover-of-planes
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics-0c6
Aidan,
She see's through your colleagues over at the International Center For 9/11 Justice, who are leading a campaign of truth suppression.
Never forget, she was around in search of the truth long before you, and for you to insult her is disgraceful. You need to get your facts straight with Patricia, as she was not exploited, as she appreciated Norman's work. That is how contact began. So do please do your homework, before making things up in your head. You really are showing that you are unhinged.
You have been very vocal, yet still unable to answer a simple yes or no question to have a debate? Is proven liar Richard Gage pulling your strings?
So YES or No to a face to face discussion?
Aidan,
Well you are being unhinged with the way you have been conducting yourself with your comments, on top of the fact that you can't even say YES or No to a closed simple question. What would you think?
So you going to answer my question or not, or you going to continue avoiding it?
It would be friendly discussion from my end, and not an argument or adhom fest. Hopefully the same from you.
Eitherway, perhaps there are areas we would agree on, and some we don't.
Please consider my invitation.
Regards!
From your response/evaluation of Patricia Casazza you stated, “ Congratulations with your successful deception of and exploitation of someone still psychologically coping with the aftermath of 9/11 (Casazza).” Aidan Monaghan, are you now a professional psychologist able to diagnose someone in a chat room saying Patricia Casazza is “psychologically coping” 24 years after a traumatic event. I listened to Norman’s very long interview with Patricia Casazza and was amazed with her fortitude and her knowledge base concerning the empirical evidence she now elaborates on. Your professional psychiatric analysis of Patricia Casazza has more to do with your attitude. Just because she came to different conclusions than you based on her research, and the fact that she has a copy of Dr Judy Wood’s book and has read it doesn’t give you any authority to analyze Patricia Casazza’s present psychological condition.
I totally agree with your comment Matthew. Aidan has shown his true colours with his comments. An utter coward to face me in a discussion, yet makes adhoms and smearing Patricia. Well I am a former Psychotherapist, and I can say from what I have observed, Patricia is in a fit place to discern the evidence. If anyone has presented as unhinged it is Aidan.
It seems you've not read the open letter, Aidan.
What a thorough researcher you make. A researcher that cannot do research, aka reading.
If you did do some reading and if you listened to our 5h discussion of what she's been witnessing over the last 24 years, is the half truths being sold by people like you and other "bastions of truth."
You really should apply yourself and familiarize yourself with Patricia's position on what the destructive mechanism on 9/11 was and especially what was captured in Manhattan's skies.
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
Then, let's address your ad hominem of "The Death Star Did 9/11".
We all know Steven E. Jones started that strawman, just like he did with calling Pons and Fleischman's work "cold fusion", back in 1989 and also how he caused the end of their careers - I suggest reading Dr Eugene Mallove's book, Fire from Ice, where he mentions Jones over 300 times, for the scientific fraud of Jones. You see Aidan, that's more reading, aka research.
Initially in 2012, most people weren’t familiar with the concept of DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), so you had to find a way to get people’s attention…
So, Dr Wood wrote a paper, called “Star Wars Beam Weapons” and whenever you have people criticizing her work, just go to her FAQ page, to answer all the silly questions. Link: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/faq/
Why was “Star Wars Beam Weapons” used as the title for that paper?
This term was used because it is a familiar term that has been used over the last 20+ years to describe weaponry under development as part of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).
Since little is known about the technology specifically, though numerous articles and Defense websites describe its existence, plus the fact that hundreds of billions of dollars have been channeled to research in this area, it is reasonable to expect that tremendous advances have been made in technology over the past 50 years since microwaves and lasers were first developed.
The title was later changed to “Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW), (brought to you by the Star Wars Program)”.
The other popular straw man distraction term used is “Space Beams” so again, let us go to the FAQ explanation…
Is your “space beam” hypothesis testable?
First of all, I have never used the term “space beams.” It is a derogatory term used to distract folks away from looking at the real evidence.
The term was first coined by physicist Steven E. Jones within days of my first posting an article suggesting a high-tech energy weapon was used to destroy the WTC. It has been speculated that the purpose of using this name was to mock the hypothesis that unconventional methods were used to destroy the WTC.
At this point, it has not been determined exactly what weapon was used, but the general category of what was used is fairly clear. The visual data as well as the issues related to the bathtub fragility and ground shaking eliminate the conventional demolition methods that have been proposed to date. The buildings “floated” to the ground as dust.
So, is this hypothesis testable? Yes!
And each of the phenomena identified at the WTC complex on 9/11 has been reproduced in a lab.
This may or may not be the exact same way of creating the effects, but it is the same mechanism.
I suggest everyone reading this comment goes through the FAQ page as you will then see how easy it was to refute Gage’s and architects for an engineered truth’s game in 2008 already.
Link: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/faq/
Hello Aidan,
You finally made it? Nice to know you have been a subscriber to ME since May 2025, with a 5 star rating in my stats, yet according to you I am putting out "unscientific disinformation". Why would you subscribe to someone putting out "unscientific disinformation"? What does this say about you? Perhaps your perception of what is possible outside of your myopic perception of science is very telling?
I see you are still pushing your "remote controlled planes" nonsense? Now if there was disinformation, I think this takes first prize.
How about you having a debate with me on the 4 planes telemetry data? Let's discuss the ACARS data or DCC radar? You can bring all your buddies along too like Dr. Piers Robinson, Richard Gage, David Chandler and Ted Walter if you like?
We know what you guys are up to over at the International Center For 9/11 Justice, with your disinformation campaigns.
Perhaps we can discuss how the wings on your remote controlled plane keep disappeared and reappearing in the videos? Perhaps you can inform me why I am wrong? How about it Aidan, you up for a debate?
Let me know regarding the debate invite, I would look forward to asking you some questions face-to-face about your BS remote controlled planes theories. Bring along Captain Dan while you are at it. My friend Norman (9/11 Revisionist) pulled him up on X (twitter), why he doesn't want to discuss the ACARS data? Very strange he and you and your crowd avoid it?
I await your answer on a debate?
Aidan,
Don't avoid the question, are you going to have a debate? Simple yes or no answer and you are struggling to say? Like Norman said, put your money where your mouth is. Don't be shy. You can bring your buddies too. Very strange you don't know the difference between a hologram and 3D volumetric projection. Perhaps I could educate you.
None of these guys have the intellectual humility to have a face to face discussion, as they KNOW that they will be exposed for their half truths they sell...
Keep an eye out for my discussion with Richard G. Ellefritz - assistant professor of sociology, at the University of The Bahamas, as we discuss the 9/11 "truth" movement and the disingenuousness of the talking heads in the movement...
Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement?
What happens if you ask TRUTH questions?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
Aidan sounds like he is just a troll. He ridicules instead of making an argument. He calls people names instead of offering evidence or his opinion. Basically he sounds like a coward. Forget him
Hi Geofry,
Exactly, he was straight off the mark with adhoms, rather than engaging. Yes, he's a coward, as he will not meet on Zoom to discuss his position, happy to be a troll in the comments.
Hi Aiden
I'd love it if you could come and explain your position of remote controlled planes, vs the Qui-Tam whistleblower case, filed in 2007, by Dr Morgan Reynolds and especially the contents of the affidavit by John Lear...
John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966.
He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011. In short - He knows WTF he's talking about.
2007 Court filings by Dr Morgan Reynolds against NIST: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
After all, you're a "seasoned 9/11 plane researcher", thus you'd easily be able to correct 9/11 Planes Research and me on what we've got wrong...
Time to put on your big boy panties, and come and put your money where your mouth is...
Why the remote takeover of planes on 9/11 is IMPOSSIBLE
Avionics technician exposes the impossibilities of remotely taking-over a commercial aircraft way back in 2007
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/why-the-remote-takeover-of-planes
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics-0c6
Hey, Aidan
Come put your money where your mouth is, and have an face to face evidence based discussion...
Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001
An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - January 2026
Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/seeking-the-whole-truth-of-september
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics-0c6