9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Oddities
A Need For Clarification
A little background to the information I am about to share in this article. During my research (some years ago) into the passengers on the “alleged” four planes on 9/11, I came across this astonishing post on the Pilots For 9/11 Truth forum. I have tried to verify the information, however the US Government’s Victims Compensation Fund records do not allow you go back into the archives records to verify the information, which I find very strange.
Interestingly, the forum post was made many years after 9/11, and one would expect that the families of those aboard the doomed flights, would have been compensated for their loss of their loved ones on 9/11. This doesn’t seem the case according to the information posted on the Pilots For 9/11 Truth forum. If anyone knows in the USA how to cross check the information contained in this article, please get in touch with me. Thank you!
9-11 Victim Compensation Fund Oddities…
This is where the US government opened up the Treasury and gave family members of those who lost their lives that day lots of money. In return, these families were basically told to shut-up about anything else concerning 9-11. (Considering all the lies surrounding this horrific event, you can see why.) Here are the results below:
Flight 11: of the 92 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 20 are listed in the SSDI (22%)
Of these 20 people, only three are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Judy Larocque
Laurie Neira
Candace Lee Williams
===================================
Flight 77: of the 64 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 14 are listed in the SSDI (22%)
Of these 64 people, only five on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
William Caswell
Eddie Dillard
Ian Gray
John Sammartino
Leonard Taylor
===================================
Flight 175: of the 65 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 18 are listed in the SSDI (28%)
Of these 65 people, only three are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Michael C. Tarrou
Gloria Debarrera
Timothy Ward
===================================
Flight 93: of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI (13%)
Of these 45 people, none are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Not one!
===================================
Have you noticed anything strange yet? Of the passengers and crew of Flight 11, 77, 175 & 93, only 22%, 22%, 28%, 13% respectively are in the SSDI.
Of the 266 people that we were told died on these jets, only 11 relatives applied for compensation. Can you believe that not a single relative from Flight 93 applied for compensation? Were all the relatives of the victims so rich that they weren't eligible to receive compensation? No, that's not it. (The minimum federal award was $250,000, and the average pay-out was about $1.8 million. The recipients only had to make agreement: they couldn’t sue the airlines.)
You should also know that most lawyers told their clients to take the money and run (which is what most lawyers would do - take the sure money). Ellen Mariani clearly elaborated on this point during her appearance on the Black Op Radio show edition 156.
Oddly, but consistent with everything concerning 9-11, the actual complete list of the people who benefited has been omitted from this report. Even without this, it does contain an interesting fact. According to the report, 98% of all the people who suffered a loss on 9-11 took the fund money. The average payment was $1.8 million.
But here's where it gets strange. According to the government, here are the number of people who accepted the compensation fund:
Out of a total of 92 people on Flight 11, only 65 accepted the 9-11 fund (71%)
Out of a total of 65 people on Flight 175, only 46 accepted the 9-11 fund (71%)
Out of a total of 64 people on Flight 77, only 33 accepted the 9-11 fund (52%)
Out of a total of 45 people on Flight 93, only 25 accepted the 9-11 fund (56%)
These stats seem to highlight glaring inconsistencies involving the planes and passengers.
These stats and figures are a repost from a page taken from the Pilots For 9/11 Truth forum.
Reference Source: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?s=e368bd9e5a4ea21644967bfb19b4c5c9&showtopic=37&st=60
Something is indeed, very fishy....
From looking at the information, two scenarios come to mind:
1): Those who did not apply for or accept compensation from the fund did so to give themselves room to sue the airlines and the government for what happened on 9/11 and press for answers (e.g., Ellen Mariani). Accepting the money would've hindered their chances to hold the relevant parties accountable, which is why they refused it.
2): Those who did not apply for or accept compensation from the fund felt that they suffered no serious losses from 9/11 and thus the money wasn't needed. Some may not have qualified for funding, anyway. They also probably didn't care that they wouldn't be able to go after the government and the airlines for what happened on 9/11 under this fund, so enrollment was no issue. Money talks, after all.
In my opinion, I think we're seeing a combination of both here.