Critique of Steve De'ak's "Frozen Smoke" Theory in the Michael Hezarkhani Video

Independent Analysis

Disclaimer: This article is in no way aimed at Steve De’ak as a person, the article is merely a critique of his theory he presents.

This is a short analysis where I examine a claim made by Steve De'ak during an interview with Jim Fetzer on the 26th March 2017. De'ak claimed the smoke/fumes plume in the Michael Hezarkhani video "freezes" and has no movement in the video during the plane crash sequence frames. After hearing this claim I decided to conduct a short analysis on the 13th April 2017, and I am publishing the findings here after clarifying some information from Steve De'ak on the 10th July 2017.

The reason for asking Steve De'ak for clarification was because I was unsure of the exact time-frame he was referring to in the video footage. This is what lead me to conduct two different time-frame studies of the video footage smoke/fumes plume. See the both analysis findings below.

See below: "close-up" comparison of the smoke/fumes plume characteristic differences in the different frames, from just before the plane "crashes" into the South Tower to when the plane "impacts" the South Tower.

The two analysis studies above "conclusively" demonstrate that the smoke/fumes plume in the Michael Hezarkhani video footage was "NOT" frozen in the frames as Steve De'ak claimed. 

Information update: 

After some back and to comments with Steve De'ak through his YouTube channel I can now confirm on 10th July 2017 that Steve De'ak told me he has "retracted" his claims for "frozen" smoke/fumes in the Michael Hezarkhani video. Just to note, this isn't about me being right, and De'ak being wrong. Steve has obviously looked closer at new information and re-evaluated his own position. This is what "good" investigators do, not being solely fixed to one idea/theory. So I commend Steve for being open, and reconsidering new information.  

See below: 

Although this might solve this matter of frozen smoke/fumes, it doesn't solve the "new" claims which Steve De'ak is proposing about the Michael Hezarkhani video, which I will be addressing in another critique article soon.

What I can say is, false have been propagated across the internet about the Michael Hezarkhani video, which has been a pattern over a long period of time, which seems ostensibly to discredit the 9/11 video evidence, footage to portray it as a fake video, which I have written about at length in other articles.

The question is: Why is it so important to discredit this piece of video footage?

The only answer I can offer is, the Hezarkhani video is undoubtedly the most famous and clearest view of the second plane impacting the South tower, which captured a number of strange anomalous problems with plane and crash physics. By portraying the video as fake, acts as an answer the visible anomalies in the video.

In reality, the video captured secret technology - 3D volumetric image projection, which cannot be revealed to the public. The video fakery explanation is a good cover-story to keep conceal the secret technology, which created the plane illusions on 9/11. This illusion technology will be undoubtedly has been planned to be used again in the further, possibly in a Project Blue Beam type of event.  

Thanks for reading!