Nose-Out Vs Dust Explosion?
Video Analysis
I am re-sharing this excellent video analysis by my fellow researcher Conspiracy Cuber. This was originally hosted at my blogger website on the 12th October 2017.
The analysis disproves the claim that the plane’s nose exits the WTC building, also known as the "nose-out" which was widely propagated by early 9/11 plane researchers Simon Shack and Ace Baker.
The two short analysis videos below are of the utmost value in determining what really exited the South Tower, which was a dust explosion or ejection.
Conclusion
Please consider carefully the evidence presented in the two analysis videos, and then be aware of how your perceptions and views have been shaped by Simon Shack (real name Simon Hytten) and Ace Baker, into believing this was a plane’s nose, when indeed it is a dust ejection.
Evaluation of new evidence
When new evidence is presented, we must assess and evaluate the evidence, which may form a new perspective, which supersedes our previous held perspectives. As an individual, one must have humility to update their perspective, and not cling to old notions, which are incongruent to the truth.
Finally, I would ask all of you to seriously consider this evidence, before clinging to old notions suggested to you from Simon Shack and Ace Baker.
Thanks for reading and caring!
UPDATE: 7th September 2025
It has been brought to my attention that Professor James Fetzer is still presenting the dust ejection as a plane’s nose in a recent debate he had with Richard Gage, 6th September 2025.
I have recently been engaging via an email thread with professor Fetzer, and even though he has been presented with new video evidence, he still persists to propagate false information about the dust ejection. I can only consider Professor Fetzer’s actions as sinister to say the least, that he is unable to re-evaluate perfectly clear video evidence, which shows without a shadow of a doubt a “dust ejection” and not a plane’s nose exiting the WTC South Tower in the video. See below:
What is Professor Fetzer’s motives to misrepresent this video evidence? I will let the reader/viewer make of this what they will.
Thanks for reading and caring!
Ace Baker's laughable faked suicide on Jim Fetzer's show is all the evidence anyone needs that the guy is/was a phony.
On top of that, he lampooned the work of Judy Wood.
And Shack's 'vicsims' fantasy deserves only derision.
Their combined efforts are pretty mediocre 'second matrix' fare, aimed at gulling the Camp Two types described by David Hughes.
Interesting - however the entire crash event itself, was a violation of the laws of physics . . . end of story . . .