Dr Morgan Reynolds and I also discussed the disinformation peddled about the planes by the 9/11 truther movement through the last two decades and we also touch on Ace Baker
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Simon Hytten (Shack), September Clues, did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
The documentary is full of disinformation and the movie should be discarded as a propaganda piece.
9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception
Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on RichPlanet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the "alleged" video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
In any case, it should be obvious that it's not the nose of a plane popping out from the opposite side of where the jet entered the building. Certainly not a real plane's nose by a long shot. There's just no way that could happen in our reality.
It's akin to the Pentagon's earlier moronic statement that Flight 77's nose-cone caused that small opening in the C ring, before they later changed that to one of its engines or fireball damage being the cause after skeptics pointed out how ludicrous that claim is.
Dr Morgan Reynolds and I also discussed the disinformation peddled about the planes by the 9/11 truther movement through the last two decades and we also touch on Ace Baker
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
I will admit that my brief, original analysis of the infamous nose out sequence (in my main September Clues docu) wasn't very clear. Later on though, I made a separate, more exhaustive 7.5-min video analysis named "NOSED OUT" (see below link). It was of course banned from Youtube (around March 2018)- just like my entire September Clues research material (including all the versions of the main docu translated in 12 languages - many of which had been reuploaded / mirrored by other Youtube users around the world, which were also deleted by Youtube "for violating Youtube's policy on hate speech"). If you have any questions regarding yours truly I will gladly reply to them - but I will kindly ask Mr. Conlon to quit spreading silly aspersions concerning my supposedly 'shady' background. Thank you. NOSED OUT: https://fakeotube.com/video/36/september-clues---nosed-out
When are you going to correct ALL the errors I have pointed out in your film? It seems you are more than happy to continue allowing these errors which are misleading people? I find the fact you haven't bothered to update these errors in your film questionable behaviour. It isn't like you haven't had long enough period of time to update it is it?
Simon you say: "spreading silly aspersions concerning my supposedly 'shady' background."
Is it not a fact that YOU did work for the European Space Agency? Is not a fact that your father worked for the UN? Is not a fact that your brother was sponsored by the Bin Laden family?
You are quite right about the fact that I should, ideally, make an updated version of September Clues – but not due to any of the “errors” that you claim to have found. Yes, my old 2008 docu does contain a few errors (e.g. my long-abandoned missile theory), but I have duly retracted and clarified the same in innumerable posts at my Cluesforum.info discussion forum. A new version of September Clues would of course have to include all the subsequent findings that I (and the collective research efforts at Cluesforum) have made and ascertained over the years (e.g. the vicsims, the CGI-crafted tower collapses, the military-grade smoke generators likely located in WC7, etc…). Here’s a succinct overview of topics that I’d like to add to my SC research documentary: “WHY IT IS DOWNRIGHT ABSURD TO THINK THAT...”(2023): https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2416969#p2416969
During this last decade however, I’ve been pursuing a most time-consuming astronomy research (“The TYCHOS” – Our Geoaxial Binary System”) – and 9/11 has definitely taken the back seat of my thoughts and efforts. In any case, I’m content with the fact that Cluesforum is still online (in spite of a number of rogue attacks which took it temporarily offline), since that is the go-to forum for anyone earnestly interested in just how the 9/11 hoax was pulled off. To be sure, it is fair to say that the sheer amount and depth of 9/11 research at Cluesforum is second to none.
As for myself, well – I’m probably the most transparent, upfront, candid, friendly and hospitable truthseeker on this planet (I’ve been hosting over the years scores of like-minded truthseekers – from all over the world - in my house in the hills of Rome, and they can all testify to that). In fact, I don’t think any ‘truther’ has ever posted as much personal details about him/herself - as I did way back in 2011:
As you may read in that old forum post of mine, my dear father did indeed work for the UN, yet resigned from it in disgust around 1985 (and passed away in 1990). He was the most exquisite, wholesome and incorruptible person you could possibly imagine, so I wish that you could leave his unblemished memory in peace. And yes, my (long-estranged) elder brother did indeed receive some sponsorship monies for his bloody racing car from the building firm owned by Yeslam Binladin, allegedly the brother of the evil “Osama” (did he even exist?). Funny, isn’t it? But so what? This doesn’t mean that “my family has ties with the Binladin family” - as some silly wannabe ‘internet sleuths’ have been claiming and diffusing for years over the web (and you are one of those, Mark). Here’s the full story (in a post of mine I wrote back in 2011): “MY BINLADIN CONNECTION”: https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2361265#p2361265
And yes, I’ve indeed been “working for” ESA. As it happens, I live a stone-throw away from the Italian ESA hub in Frascati and, several years ago, I used to chat with a few of their international employees at the local pub. One of them (a Frenchman) became a fan of my music and suggested to his boss that I could make some soundtracks for their video presentations. In the end, I made a total of two short (2-minute-long) soundtracks for ESA. Yeah, the money was good – and I sure needed it (and still do, by the way – being a totally independent / unconnected and unfunded researcher who ‘madly’ publishes ALL of his plucky research completely free of charge on the web!).
So, my dear Mark, I will now use the term “idiotic” to describe your longstanding efforts to try and smear my persona with that old and worn-out UN/BINLADIN/ESA meme (started by Phil Jayhan at his Let’s Roll forums eons ago). I now solemnly ask you to retract it – and present your apologies to all of your readers (whoever they may be?) for diffusing inane and libelous crap on your channels. Having said that – and being of a conciliatory disposition – you are quite welcome to come and visit me in the hills of Rome. 😊
You need to update all those errors I have pointed out, and not be so resistant to presenting the truth in your film.
Deceiving people with parallax and lens registration anomalies, and presenting it as video fakery, is rather dishonest of you in my opinion.
What about your 9/11 Amateur “black gash” you said was photoshopped in, and where you edited out that 11 minutes of important video footage?
For me, thankfully, people are waking up to the errors in your films.
Regarding your comment, I am sorry though Simon, your response proves even more to me, that you have no intention of presenting honest research.
Regarding your accusation that I am trying to smear your persona, and being libelous, let me remind you, I reported truthfully, and factual, that your father worked for the UN, your brother was sponsored by the Bin Laden family, and you did work for the European Space Agency. Why would I retract that? You even confirmed it in the previous comment. There is nothing libelous about reporting those facts, or pointing out the many flaws and errors you present as video fakery in your films. The suspicious elements is your behaviour, that all these years later, you have not corrected your errors, and still will not acknowledge my points, which are without any doubt, prove your errors. Surely, you should take on board and correct them. So there is nothing libelous about that, and nothing for me to retract.
While we are on the point of “libelous” behaviour, perhaps you should spare a thought for all the lies you have told about people like Jennifer Spell, and other videographers you have spoke ill of, accusing them of fabricating their videos, and being part of a conspiracy. In your film you stepped into to the area of defamation of their characters, which IS libelous. Remember Simon, people in glass houses, shouldn’t throw stones.
Finally, I will leave your comments up, even though you have put multiple links there sign-posting people to your drivel.
I’d love to visit you in Rome, and that is kind of you to offer. However, in the meantime, would you consider doing a podcast with me? This could be an opportunity for you to perhaps explain to me where I am wrong with the errors I have pointed out in your film? And also a space for you to put across your findings. I am more than happy to give you a space which would be open and fair. You could even take the opportunity to personally apologise to all the videographers you have defamed and upset, like Jennifer Spell?
It’s about time, I have been waiting since 2013 for him to get back to me about the points in my articles I raise. But I don’t think he will be correcting any of his bullshit anytime soon.
Simon Hytten (Shack), September Clues, did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
The documentary is full of disinformation and the movie should be discarded as a propaganda piece.
9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception
Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on RichPlanet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the "alleged" video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
Ace Baker's laughable faked suicide on Jim Fetzer's show is all the evidence anyone needs that the guy is/was a phony.
On top of that, he lampooned the work of Judy Wood.
And Shack's 'vicsims' fantasy deserves only derision.
Their combined efforts are pretty mediocre 'second matrix' fare, aimed at gulling the Camp Two types described by David Hughes.
Dr Morgan Reynolds and I also discussed the disinformation peddled about the planes by the 9/11 truther movement through the last two decades and we also touch on Ace Baker
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
Simon Hytten (Shack), September Clues, did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
The documentary is full of disinformation and the movie should be discarded as a propaganda piece.
9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception
Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on RichPlanet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the "alleged" video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
Link: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-layers-of-deception
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part One)
Exposing The Disinformation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception
'Layers of deception': how ironic.
I confess, I fell for it myself, in the early years.
Interesting - however the entire crash event itself, was a violation of the laws of physics . . . end of story . . .
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
In any case, it should be obvious that it's not the nose of a plane popping out from the opposite side of where the jet entered the building. Certainly not a real plane's nose by a long shot. There's just no way that could happen in our reality.
It's akin to the Pentagon's earlier moronic statement that Flight 77's nose-cone caused that small opening in the C ring, before they later changed that to one of its engines or fireball damage being the cause after skeptics pointed out how ludicrous that claim is.
Fascinating piece, it's an incredible close-up of what really happened there. Thank you for sharing!
Ace Barker - The 9/11 Plane Disinformation Agent
Video: https://rumble.com/v6wsd7g-ace-barker-the-911-plane-disinformation-agent.html
Why Ace Baker's Video Fakery Compositing Theory Is Invalid
Independent Analysis of Ace Baker's Video Compositing Theory
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/why-ace-bakers-video-fakery-compositing
Thank you for reposting this!
Debunking Ace Baker - "The Key" CGI & Video Fakery Plane Compositing Theory
Video: https://rumble.com/v4etrm3-debunking-ace-baker-the-key-cgi-and-video-fakery-plane-compositing-theory.html
Dr Morgan Reynolds and I also discussed the disinformation peddled about the planes by the 9/11 truther movement through the last two decades and we also touch on Ace Baker
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
I will admit that my brief, original analysis of the infamous nose out sequence (in my main September Clues docu) wasn't very clear. Later on though, I made a separate, more exhaustive 7.5-min video analysis named "NOSED OUT" (see below link). It was of course banned from Youtube (around March 2018)- just like my entire September Clues research material (including all the versions of the main docu translated in 12 languages - many of which had been reuploaded / mirrored by other Youtube users around the world, which were also deleted by Youtube "for violating Youtube's policy on hate speech"). If you have any questions regarding yours truly I will gladly reply to them - but I will kindly ask Mr. Conlon to quit spreading silly aspersions concerning my supposedly 'shady' background. Thank you. NOSED OUT: https://fakeotube.com/video/36/september-clues---nosed-out
Hello Simon,
When are you going to correct ALL the errors I have pointed out in your film? It seems you are more than happy to continue allowing these errors which are misleading people? I find the fact you haven't bothered to update these errors in your film questionable behaviour. It isn't like you haven't had long enough period of time to update it is it?
The fact you sharing a link still presenting a dust ejection as a plane nose is also questionable? Anyway, here's my rebuttal to the link that Mr. Hytten has shared in his response. https://911planesresearch.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/145139465/share-center?alreadyPublished=true
Simon you say: "spreading silly aspersions concerning my supposedly 'shady' background."
Is it not a fact that YOU did work for the European Space Agency? Is not a fact that your father worked for the UN? Is not a fact that your brother was sponsored by the Bin Laden family?
Regards,
Mark Conlon.
My dear Mark,
You are quite right about the fact that I should, ideally, make an updated version of September Clues – but not due to any of the “errors” that you claim to have found. Yes, my old 2008 docu does contain a few errors (e.g. my long-abandoned missile theory), but I have duly retracted and clarified the same in innumerable posts at my Cluesforum.info discussion forum. A new version of September Clues would of course have to include all the subsequent findings that I (and the collective research efforts at Cluesforum) have made and ascertained over the years (e.g. the vicsims, the CGI-crafted tower collapses, the military-grade smoke generators likely located in WC7, etc…). Here’s a succinct overview of topics that I’d like to add to my SC research documentary: “WHY IT IS DOWNRIGHT ABSURD TO THINK THAT...”(2023): https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2416969#p2416969
During this last decade however, I’ve been pursuing a most time-consuming astronomy research (“The TYCHOS” – Our Geoaxial Binary System”) – and 9/11 has definitely taken the back seat of my thoughts and efforts. In any case, I’m content with the fact that Cluesforum is still online (in spite of a number of rogue attacks which took it temporarily offline), since that is the go-to forum for anyone earnestly interested in just how the 9/11 hoax was pulled off. To be sure, it is fair to say that the sheer amount and depth of 9/11 research at Cluesforum is second to none.
As for myself, well – I’m probably the most transparent, upfront, candid, friendly and hospitable truthseeker on this planet (I’ve been hosting over the years scores of like-minded truthseekers – from all over the world - in my house in the hills of Rome, and they can all testify to that). In fact, I don’t think any ‘truther’ has ever posted as much personal details about him/herself - as I did way back in 2011:
“WHO THE HECK IS SIMON SHACK?” (2011): https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2351730#p2351730
As you may read in that old forum post of mine, my dear father did indeed work for the UN, yet resigned from it in disgust around 1985 (and passed away in 1990). He was the most exquisite, wholesome and incorruptible person you could possibly imagine, so I wish that you could leave his unblemished memory in peace. And yes, my (long-estranged) elder brother did indeed receive some sponsorship monies for his bloody racing car from the building firm owned by Yeslam Binladin, allegedly the brother of the evil “Osama” (did he even exist?). Funny, isn’t it? But so what? This doesn’t mean that “my family has ties with the Binladin family” - as some silly wannabe ‘internet sleuths’ have been claiming and diffusing for years over the web (and you are one of those, Mark). Here’s the full story (in a post of mine I wrote back in 2011): “MY BINLADIN CONNECTION”: https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2361265#p2361265
And yes, I’ve indeed been “working for” ESA. As it happens, I live a stone-throw away from the Italian ESA hub in Frascati and, several years ago, I used to chat with a few of their international employees at the local pub. One of them (a Frenchman) became a fan of my music and suggested to his boss that I could make some soundtracks for their video presentations. In the end, I made a total of two short (2-minute-long) soundtracks for ESA. Yeah, the money was good – and I sure needed it (and still do, by the way – being a totally independent / unconnected and unfunded researcher who ‘madly’ publishes ALL of his plucky research completely free of charge on the web!).
Here are the two ESA tracks I made – enjoy!
GOCE: https://septclues.com/AUDIO%20FILES/GOCEmix1.mp3
CRYOSAT: https://septclues.com/AUDIO%20FILES/ESA_Cryosat_soundtrack.mp3
So, my dear Mark, I will now use the term “idiotic” to describe your longstanding efforts to try and smear my persona with that old and worn-out UN/BINLADIN/ESA meme (started by Phil Jayhan at his Let’s Roll forums eons ago). I now solemnly ask you to retract it – and present your apologies to all of your readers (whoever they may be?) for diffusing inane and libelous crap on your channels. Having said that – and being of a conciliatory disposition – you are quite welcome to come and visit me in the hills of Rome. 😊
Fancy seeing you here and that you're still willing to show your face.
How about we do an evidence based podcast - You man enough for that?
Here is my critique of you:
The Loose Change & September Clues 9/11 PSYOPS
The most important thought experiment to date
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-loose-change-911-psyop
Oh Simon,
You need to update all those errors I have pointed out, and not be so resistant to presenting the truth in your film.
Deceiving people with parallax and lens registration anomalies, and presenting it as video fakery, is rather dishonest of you in my opinion.
What about your 9/11 Amateur “black gash” you said was photoshopped in, and where you edited out that 11 minutes of important video footage?
For me, thankfully, people are waking up to the errors in your films.
Regarding your comment, I am sorry though Simon, your response proves even more to me, that you have no intention of presenting honest research.
Regarding your accusation that I am trying to smear your persona, and being libelous, let me remind you, I reported truthfully, and factual, that your father worked for the UN, your brother was sponsored by the Bin Laden family, and you did work for the European Space Agency. Why would I retract that? You even confirmed it in the previous comment. There is nothing libelous about reporting those facts, or pointing out the many flaws and errors you present as video fakery in your films. The suspicious elements is your behaviour, that all these years later, you have not corrected your errors, and still will not acknowledge my points, which are without any doubt, prove your errors. Surely, you should take on board and correct them. So there is nothing libelous about that, and nothing for me to retract.
While we are on the point of “libelous” behaviour, perhaps you should spare a thought for all the lies you have told about people like Jennifer Spell, and other videographers you have spoke ill of, accusing them of fabricating their videos, and being part of a conspiracy. In your film you stepped into to the area of defamation of their characters, which IS libelous. Remember Simon, people in glass houses, shouldn’t throw stones.
Finally, I will leave your comments up, even though you have put multiple links there sign-posting people to your drivel.
I’d love to visit you in Rome, and that is kind of you to offer. However, in the meantime, would you consider doing a podcast with me? This could be an opportunity for you to perhaps explain to me where I am wrong with the errors I have pointed out in your film? And also a space for you to put across your findings. I am more than happy to give you a space which would be open and fair. You could even take the opportunity to personally apologise to all the videographers you have defamed and upset, like Jennifer Spell?
Regards
Mark.
Wow. I never thought you would pop-up here, Simon.
It’s about time, I have been waiting since 2013 for him to get back to me about the points in my articles I raise. But I don’t think he will be correcting any of his bullshit anytime soon.
Hi Simon
Fancy seeing you here and that you're still willing to show your face. How about we do an evidence based podcast - You man enough for that?
Here is my critique of you:
The Loose Change & September Clues 9/11 PSYOPS
The most important thought experiment to date
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-loose-change-911-psyop
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
The 9/11 TRUTH vs Stand-Down PSY-OPS
Make people believe that someone or some group external to themselves is going to "save" or "rescue" them
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-truth-vs-stand-down-psy-ops
whats the content - for those of us who are not members of FARCEBOOK
That Farcebook group pushes CGI planes and Simon Shack's drivel.
No big deal, I can do without FarceBook . . . .
Simon Hytten (Shack), September Clues, did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
The documentary is full of disinformation and the movie should be discarded as a propaganda piece.
9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception
Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on RichPlanet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the "alleged" video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
Link: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-layers-of-deception
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part One)
Exposing The Disinformation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part Two)
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-086
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part Three)
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-3ff
September Clues - Addendum - Deceptions - Part One
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions
September Clues - Addendum Deceptions - Part Two
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions-bcd
Simon Shack’s Amateur Effort of Video Fakery
Cutting Through the Disinformation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-amateur-effort-of-video
Simon Shack "Misrepresents" Plane Flight Path in 9/11 Video
Independent Analysis: Exposing Falsehoods of Simon Shack
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shack-misrepresents-plane-flight
Why Ace Baker's Video Fakery Compositing Theory Is Invalid
Independent Analysis of Ace Baker's Video Compositing Theory
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/why-ace-bakers-video-fakery-compositing