Did Passengers Board A Duplicate United 93?

An Independent Investigation

In the official narrative the passengers of United 93 boarded the airplane from Gate 17 of Terminal A at Newark Liberty International Airport on 9/11. However there appears to be an account of passengers boarding United 93 from the tarmac. This eyewitness account comes from the New York Giants football player Triton Clayton White.

“We had played a Monday night game in Denver, and flew back home the next morning,” White said. “We landed in Newark, N.J., about 6:45 in the morning. We usually get off the plane on the tarmac and board a bus to get to our cars. I noticed another plane sitting next to ours because the people were walking to the plane across the tarmac instead of through the jet way. Two weeks later, as we’re taking another plane to a game, one of the stewardesses informed us the plane that had been boarding next to us was Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania on 9/11. That was a very eerie feeling.” - Fayetteville Observer (01/31/06)

Is it possible Triton Clayton White observed something he was not supposed to? Is it possible the planners of 9/11 did not take into account the possibility of charter flights off-loading on the same tarmac, where a second group of passengers boarded a duplicate United 93? Did Triton Clayton White witness the duplicate UAL 93 being boarded on the Tarmac at Newark Airport, which is another separate boarding onto a different airplane, which could explain the discrepancies in the official data between the BTS and ACARS data take-off times? There is no reference in any official information or data of a second boarding of passengers onto United 93.

The strange encounter that Anthony F. Mazza had with United 93 at Newark Airport on 9/11

On the morning of 9/11, Anthony F. Mazza was working at Newark Airport as a fueling technician. One of the planes he provided with fuel was United Airlines ‘United 93’. In the cockpit of the plane he met a person who was apparently neither Leroy Homer, Jr, the co-pilot, nor Jason Dahl, the pilot.

On Oct. 19, 2001, Anthony F. Mazza was interviewed by the FBI. Here’s the FBI report:

Anthony F. Mazza, Mazza worked as a fueler for Ogden Aviation Services at Newark International Airport since 1973. Mazza fueled United Airlines ‘Flight 93’ on September 11, 2001 prior to its departure and crash in western Pennsylvania. Mazza stated that everything seemed normal on the flight including the amount of fuel that was pumped into Flight 93’s tank. Mazza stated that prior to the passengers boarding Flight 93, he had completed fueling the plane and proceeded to the cockpit to inform the co-pilot of the completed task. This has been the standard operating procedure for United flights out of Newark for many years. Mazza entered the cockpit where he handed the fueling sheet to a young Caucasian male, well groomed, brown hair and a white shirt, who was sitting in the co-pilot’s seat. The male responded to Mazza by saying thank you and taking the paper from him. Mazza then departed Flight 93 prior to the passengers boarding. Mazza stated that this was approximately 30 minutes prior to the scheduled departure time. Mazza was interviewed by FAA employee John Patani shortly after the crash in western Pennsylvania. Mazza stated that he reported that there was nothing unusual on the day of the flight and that the plane had been fuelled without incident. http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2009/09/who-was-male-in-flight-93s-co-pilot.html

On Friday, October 12, 2001 Mazza saw a memorial for the crew of Flight 93 and saw pictures of the co-pilot of Flight 93. The picture was the actual co-pilot of Flight 93, who was Leroy Homer. Mazza stated that he was certain that the co-pilot he spoke with was not Mr. Homer. http://www.911myths.com/images/e/ed/Team7_Box12_LeroyHomer.pdf

Who was the “male” in the co-pilot’s seat, if it wasn’t neither Leroy Homer nor Jason Dahl, the pilot? After seeing the memorial, Mazza obviously took the initiative to contact the FBI. Had he identified Dahl - whose picture he certainly saw, too - as the “male”, he would not have felt compelled to call the FBI? When interviewing Mazza, the FBI surely asked him about this possibility and probably showed photos of Dahl again. In any case, the absence of Dahl in the report makes it clear that he was not the “male” either, and Dahl was 43 years old, not really a young man like the “male” as described by Mazza.

With Triton Clayton White’s observations, and also Anthony Mazza’s, strongly suggest something is not as it seems with United 93, with passengers seen boarding from the tarmac, and with Mazza not recognising neither Leroy Homer, Jr, the co-pilot, nor Jason Dahl, the pilot.

Further additional evidence is revealed in an official 9/11 Commission Investigation document, which states, passenger Mark Bingham was not assigned by name nor a seat number in the Flight Manifest for United 93.

Source: Any Report Prepared By The Chicago Field That Analyzed The Load Patterns On United Airlines Flight 175 And 93 - Responsive To Requests #35-2 (Packet #1)

Confirmation of this damming evidence of Mark Bingham not being assigned a seat number on United 93, is contained in the early version of United 93’s Flight Manifest, which also does not have Mark Bingham’s name listed as a passenger aboard the flight. This obviously posed a major problem for the official narrative. Later releases of the Flight Manifest mysteriously included Mark Bingham’s name.

Alice Hoglan, Mark Bingham’s mother tried to explain to the 9/11 Commission investigative team, that her son may have been using her United Airlines employee pass, being as Alice Hoglan was a United Airlines Flight Attendant. Even if this were the case, Mark Bingham still would have been assigned a seat number as he boarded the flight. And this would have shown on the Flight Manifest, because the Flight Manifest would have been handed over to the United Airlines personnel before the flight pushed back from the gate after the plane’s door was closed.

This begs the question, whether or not Mark Bingham ever boarded United 93, or boarded a duplicate United 93 instead?

In my previous analysis I have conducted into the official telemetry data for United 93, it indicated that there were at least two pieces of “official” data which showed there were two United 93’s listed in the system, and in the air and at two different locations at the same time. The official evidence also supports that, perhaps the other United 93 may have been part of a war-games hijacking simulation exercises, which were taking place on 9/11?

For further study, See two of my previous analysis articles below:

The Twin Flights of United 93
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/the-twin-flights-of-united-93

United 93 - An Independent Analysis of the Evidence
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/united-93-an-independent-analysis

Thanks for reading and caring!