In this short video analysis I conducted in 2017, I point-out false claims made by Simon Shack in his Addendum film.
Video description Below:
Shack claimed that “PAT” the helicopter simply vanished the NY1 news video. Shack’s treatment and presentation of the NY1 news video footage is in serious question.
1. Why did Shack point out “PAT” the helicopter in the "wrong" place in the video?
2. Why hasn’t Shack corrected this mistake? He is still promoting this as evidence of “video fakery”, when clearly it is NOT.
Also to note, is Shack’s treatment and presentation of the Ilse Fernandez video footage. Again, Shack’s claim that “PAT” the helicopter was not present in her video footage, when clearly it is visible in Ilse Fernandez’s “original” video footage, shows again how Shack is promoting false claims of evidence for “video fakery”.
The “original” Ilse Fernandez video footage was uploaded to her YouTube channel on 20th September 2007, which is 18 months before Shack’s version of her video appears in his September Clues - Addendum film, which he uploaded to his YouTube channel on the 23rd March 2009.
1. Why did Shack remove “PAT” the helicopter from the Ilse Fernandez video footage? 2. Why is Shack misleading the viewers to prove falsely, evidence of “video fakery”?
For an in depth analysis and study I conducted of Shack’s Addendum film, please follow the links below:
September Clues - Addendum - Deceptions - Part One
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions
September Clues - Addendum Deceptions - Part Two
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions-bcd
To read all my analysis articles on Shack’s deceptions you can follow the link below:
Thanks for watching, reading and still caring.