Hi, I have embedded the video file you sent to me, so it is playable within the article now, rather than from YouTube. I have left the YouTube there, in case people want to use that too. Thanks for grabbing the video file for me!
i'm wondering about a few things. Does Carl James infer that all those synchronicities involving tower symbolism and the numbers 9 and 11 in the Back to the Future movies, were deliberately embedded in the films, or that they rather spontaneously appeared there due to an esoteric/vibrational synergy between the movies and 9/11 events ?
If they were deliberately planted however, wouldn't the producers/director have had to specifically instruct the set fabricators and art and special effects depts. somehow to the effect that, "We need 2 towers and the numbers 9 and 11 symbolized as much as possible in as many scenes as possible, but done so in a very clandestine, obscured fashion." If this was the case though, wouldn't there be a good possibility that someone who was part of implementing those directives, have likely put 2 and 2 together when 9/11 happened, and come out publicly saying, "Hey, they were obviously instructing us to represent 9/11 in those movies, so doesn't that point to some Americans as having been behind 9/11, rather than Bin Laden ?" ?
Personally i've long believed that Star Trek had the most significant and specific warning about 9/11 -- about the dangerous technology used, and who was behind it as well as their greater plan, of which 9/11 was the first installment.
Although Gene Roddenberry is well known to be the singular creator of Star Trek, much speculation has also been made that he was acting on instructions from higher sources, extraterrestrial ones, and that this input was what made the TV series both highly original and successful. It has also been documented that he participated in some of the high level channeling sessions making regular contact with ETs, organized by Andrija Puharich between the 1950s to the 70s.
Before the receptivity of the Star Trek concept by 1960s audiences was known and thus there being the possibility of a no go decision by the network, Roddenberry seems to have been tasked with at least making sure the ET's most essential message got out to the public through the pilot. The original pilot was called 'The Cage' however, it never made it past the network execs, but the series was OK'd, so he was still able to finesse a reworked version into a later slot in the first season.
What could have been the ET's imperative message to humanity was re-worked as the 2 episode, 'The Menagerie', which portrayed a race of beings on a distant planet able to perpetrate with only their minds, an illusion of reality that cloaked or replaced the original physical reality. The humans that had been marooned on the planet for some time, as well as their rescuers, were duped by this mind illusion to the extent of living emersed in it, assuming it to be actual reality. Considering that the ethics of Star Trek were generally very humanitarian, the point was made, when in the end, this alternate reality-creation capacity of the aliens was considered so serious and dangerous by Star Fleet Command (and thus by inference, the ETs advising Roddenberry) that the planet was declared off limits to all, on the pain of death.
So this could likely have been the warning to humanity through Star Trek in 1966 -- of a dangerous alien technology to be used at some future date on Earth, what others have termed Holographic Insert Technology. And later on in the Star Trek franchise we have the predator Borg who systematically occupy planets along their path of colonization, and turn the inhabitants into digital-minded androids embedded within their alien mind matrix.
There's little need to show the significance of Star Trek's Borg to Elon Musk's Neuralink or Ray Kurzweil's Singularity, but the direct relevance of planes being seen by some while being seen as missiles by others, and twin tower debris originally composed of stone and metal continuing to fizzle and transmute while emitting unknown vapours for months afterwards, should make it obvious that it couldn't have been anything earthly that caused 9/11. Maybe some humans have now acquired that same capability to wield reality itself, but i would still highly doubt that they are able to do that trick solely on their own initiative.
In the 1980s, the alien abduction phenomenon was so prevalent, that it couldn't be denied that ET presence on planet Earth was a very likely probability. There is even the famous Brooklyn Bridge Abduction case in 1989, which was documented by Budd Hopkins where numerous people witnessed a woman being transported out of a building on a beam of light by 3 grey aliens. Of course the reality of ET has never officially gotten over the hump of a sure thing in the known factverse, but doesn't it still make very good sense that it would be so very essential to this particular nefarious alien race's plans here on Earth, if they do indeed exist, to make it their number one priority to forestall every possibility of their existence ever making it over that very hump ?
And wasn't a classic saucer UFO witnessed by some people near the towers on 9/11 ? Maybe it could even have been the same craft that was involved in abducting that woman in 1989 by the Brooklyn Bridge ? And maybe the alien inhabitants were able to cloak missiles with plane illusions, using their higher-dimensional mental abilities, while dustifying all the buildings in the plaza through their mind-based Holographic Insert tech, at the same time that survivors in the towers clung on in the original version of reality.
Can't see the video Mark - You need to download the video and embed it in your article, please...
Hi, I have embedded the video file you sent to me, so it is playable within the article now, rather than from YouTube. I have left the YouTube there, in case people want to use that too. Thanks for grabbing the video file for me!
i'm wondering about a few things. Does Carl James infer that all those synchronicities involving tower symbolism and the numbers 9 and 11 in the Back to the Future movies, were deliberately embedded in the films, or that they rather spontaneously appeared there due to an esoteric/vibrational synergy between the movies and 9/11 events ?
If they were deliberately planted however, wouldn't the producers/director have had to specifically instruct the set fabricators and art and special effects depts. somehow to the effect that, "We need 2 towers and the numbers 9 and 11 symbolized as much as possible in as many scenes as possible, but done so in a very clandestine, obscured fashion." If this was the case though, wouldn't there be a good possibility that someone who was part of implementing those directives, have likely put 2 and 2 together when 9/11 happened, and come out publicly saying, "Hey, they were obviously instructing us to represent 9/11 in those movies, so doesn't that point to some Americans as having been behind 9/11, rather than Bin Laden ?" ?
Personally i've long believed that Star Trek had the most significant and specific warning about 9/11 -- about the dangerous technology used, and who was behind it as well as their greater plan, of which 9/11 was the first installment.
Although Gene Roddenberry is well known to be the singular creator of Star Trek, much speculation has also been made that he was acting on instructions from higher sources, extraterrestrial ones, and that this input was what made the TV series both highly original and successful. It has also been documented that he participated in some of the high level channeling sessions making regular contact with ETs, organized by Andrija Puharich between the 1950s to the 70s.
Before the receptivity of the Star Trek concept by 1960s audiences was known and thus there being the possibility of a no go decision by the network, Roddenberry seems to have been tasked with at least making sure the ET's most essential message got out to the public through the pilot. The original pilot was called 'The Cage' however, it never made it past the network execs, but the series was OK'd, so he was still able to finesse a reworked version into a later slot in the first season.
What could have been the ET's imperative message to humanity was re-worked as the 2 episode, 'The Menagerie', which portrayed a race of beings on a distant planet able to perpetrate with only their minds, an illusion of reality that cloaked or replaced the original physical reality. The humans that had been marooned on the planet for some time, as well as their rescuers, were duped by this mind illusion to the extent of living emersed in it, assuming it to be actual reality. Considering that the ethics of Star Trek were generally very humanitarian, the point was made, when in the end, this alternate reality-creation capacity of the aliens was considered so serious and dangerous by Star Fleet Command (and thus by inference, the ETs advising Roddenberry) that the planet was declared off limits to all, on the pain of death.
So this could likely have been the warning to humanity through Star Trek in 1966 -- of a dangerous alien technology to be used at some future date on Earth, what others have termed Holographic Insert Technology. And later on in the Star Trek franchise we have the predator Borg who systematically occupy planets along their path of colonization, and turn the inhabitants into digital-minded androids embedded within their alien mind matrix.
There's little need to show the significance of Star Trek's Borg to Elon Musk's Neuralink or Ray Kurzweil's Singularity, but the direct relevance of planes being seen by some while being seen as missiles by others, and twin tower debris originally composed of stone and metal continuing to fizzle and transmute while emitting unknown vapours for months afterwards, should make it obvious that it couldn't have been anything earthly that caused 9/11. Maybe some humans have now acquired that same capability to wield reality itself, but i would still highly doubt that they are able to do that trick solely on their own initiative.
In the 1980s, the alien abduction phenomenon was so prevalent, that it couldn't be denied that ET presence on planet Earth was a very likely probability. There is even the famous Brooklyn Bridge Abduction case in 1989, which was documented by Budd Hopkins where numerous people witnessed a woman being transported out of a building on a beam of light by 3 grey aliens. Of course the reality of ET has never officially gotten over the hump of a sure thing in the known factverse, but doesn't it still make very good sense that it would be so very essential to this particular nefarious alien race's plans here on Earth, if they do indeed exist, to make it their number one priority to forestall every possibility of their existence ever making it over that very hump ?
And wasn't a classic saucer UFO witnessed by some people near the towers on 9/11 ? Maybe it could even have been the same craft that was involved in abducting that woman in 1989 by the Brooklyn Bridge ? And maybe the alien inhabitants were able to cloak missiles with plane illusions, using their higher-dimensional mental abilities, while dustifying all the buildings in the plaza through their mind-based Holographic Insert tech, at the same time that survivors in the towers clung on in the original version of reality.