Michael Hezarkhani Video - Plane Wing & South Tower Anomaly EXPLAINED
An Independent Analysis
Yet again, this video still image from the Michael Hezarkhani video is doing the rounds on the social media platforms, claiming that the plane wing has a glitch because it is disappearing behind the South Tower’s edge. I addressed and explained this alleged “glitch” in July 2017, in this article here: https://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/2017/07/michael-hezarkhani-video-plane-wing.html
To save people clicking the link to my original July 2017 analysis article, I will share it below after my short preface.
Preface
The thrust of the image that is being re-circulated on social media is to deceive people into believing the wing is the result of a CGI glitch, and to promote the false theory that the plane has been inserted into the video footage, thus promoting the notion that all the plane videos are fake. These three explanations are part of a wider psychological operation, to not only cover-up the stronger evidence of “real” plane wing glitches captured in the videos, which cannot be debunked, but as I have exposed in my early articles, showing that the “video fakery” theories acts as distraction to steer people away from learning about an advanced 3D volumetric illusion technology, which was used in all 4 of the planes operation on 9/11.
What the videographers captured in real-time on their cameras, along with eyewitness accounts to the plane events, was the best evidence to show the planes was not real, and a real-time demonstration of advanced illusion technology, which is why the videos had to be discredited, and presented as fake.
See my missing wing analysis images below, which are not able to be debunked, and not presented as fake videos.
The videos captured glitches in the 3D volumetric illusion technology, which eyewitnesses observed and described in their accounts.
So we were not looking at fake videos with a fake plane, but real videos capturing a real-time 3D volumetric illusion technoloy plane, witnessed by people at the scene of the events.
People can read my research articles covering the anomaly issues with 2nd plane wings at the links below:
3D Volumetric Holograms
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/t/3d-volumetric-holograms
Video & Photo Analysis
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/t/video-and-photo-analysis
For the sake of this article today, I am going to explain why this particular glitch doing the rounds on social media currently has a completely reasonable explanation, and is no way the result of video fakery or CGI glitches.
Original July 2017 Analysis Article Below:
Michael Hezarkhani Video - Plane Wing & North Tower Anomaly - “EXPLAINED”
By Mark Conlon
In this short analysis I will explore a theory that has been circulating the internet regarding Flight 175's plane wing briefly passing behind the edge of the South Tower Building in the Michael Hezarkhani video footage. Many people have thought that this was proof and evidence that the Michael Hezarkhani's video was fabricated. See image below:
To briefly explain why the plane's wing appears to be going behind the South Tower's edge in this version above of the Michael Hezarkhani video, is because the video has been converted into "super" slow-motion. This is a process which takes a normal video recording at 30fps and makes it into 60fps or even 90fps using some computer software. This is so the video runs smoother when viewed in slow-motion.
The process to create a super slow-motion effect basically creates interpreted frames between the original frames. So the frame being created is not entirely a genuine frame, as it is an interpreted creation of two frames which is known as motion interpolation, also known as, Inbetweening or Tweening, which is the process of generating intermediate frames between two images to give the appearance that the first image evolves smoothly into the second image, which is why we see the anomaly circled in red in the video image above, where the plane's wing appears to disappear behind the edge of the South Tower building. This anomaly is no-way attributed to "video fakery" as suggested by many 9/11 researchers. It is just an artefact of the software to create the video to appear in super slow-motion.
The process of creating super slow-motion video:
As we can see the plane's wing is very similar in colour to the South Tower's edge. The computer software struggles to separate the two colours, especially when trying to convert and create a lower quality compressed version of the of Michael Hezarkhani video, which is why we see the visual separation effect between the plane's wing and building. See the image on the right below:
As we can observe in the two comparison images above, the image on the left shows the plane's wing is not separated between the South Tower's edge, however they do merge together, because the plane's wing passes in front of the South Tower's edge, however the image on the right demonstrates how the computer software interpreted the frame, thus creating the appearance of the wing disappearing behind the South Tower's edge in the super slow-motion video version when compared to the original frame on the left.
See below shows the original 3 x frames of the Michael Hezarkhani video, showing that the plane's wing does NOT pass behind the South Tower's building edge.
Conclusion:
As we can observe, legitimate explanations explain the anomaly in this case and it cannot be attributed to "video fakery" as suggested by many 9/11 researchers. Any analysis of the Michael Hezarkhani video should be conducted with the original quality video, and not using a super slow-motion version.
Thanks for reading and caring!










Here’s another related observation to ruminate on- look carefully again at the entrance holes where the planes impacted and breached the structure. Most of the aircraft structure did not exit the building- and yet there is no visibility any large portion of the aircraft- particularly the empennage- after it came to rest. Post impact, the fuselage and empennage, while seriously damaged and charred, still should be visible inside the hole- does anyone see any visibly identifiable remainder of an aircraft fuselage, wing empennage or engine anywhere in either opening?