No Jet Fuel at the United 93 Crash Site on 9/11

An Independent Investigation

In this short article, I present more evidence to support all the other evidence I have cited, which shows United 93 did not crash in Shanksville, PA, on 9/11.

Six days after 9/11, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) began taking soil samples around the Flight 93 crash site, to test for jet fuel, hydraulic fluids, and other hazardous materials. At least three test wells were sunk to monitor groundwater for signs of contamination.

Source: Steve Levin and Tom Barnes, "Flight 93 Relatives Gathering for Service." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, September 17, 2001; Tom Gibb, "Latest Somerset Crash Site Findings May Yield Added IDs."

According to the National Transportation Safety Board, Flight 93 had about 37,500 pounds of fuel remaining when it crashed, which was around 77 percent of its fuel load on takeoff.

Source: John O'Callaghan and Daniel Bower, "Study of Autopilot, Navigation Equipment, and Fuel Consumption Activity Based on United Airlines Flight 93 and American Airlines Flight 77 Digital Flight Data Recorder Information." National Transportation Safety Board, February 13, 2002.

Yet the DEP tests found no evidence of this huge volume of jet fuel at the crash site. Two weeks after the tests began, DEP spokeswoman Betsy Mallison reported that "no contamination has been discovered."

Source: Tom Gibb, "Latest Somerset Crash Site Findings May Yield Added IDs."

She said that, "whether it burned away or evaporated," much of the jet fuel assumed to have spilled at the site "seems to have dissipated."

Source: "Environmental Restoration Begins at Somerset Site." Pittsburgh Channel, October 2, 2001.

Strange Hot Spots

Despite the absence of jet fuel in the soil, "hot spots" sometimes erupted in the crater where Flight 93 supposedly crashed. Investigators reported that these flared up as early as the morning of September 12. According to volunteer firefighter Barry Kister, "The Shanksville Volunteer Fire Department was called in occasionally, because somebody would dig into a hot spot and that would cause a little fire." Whether any attempt was made to determine the cause of these "hot spots" is unclear.

Paper Survives the Fires

Hess's theory that "most of the hazardous fluids were consumed by the crash's fire" is further complicated by the fact that, though evidence of a huge volume of jet fuel was not found, large amounts of paper (which is, of course, highly flammable) survived, and were discovered around the crash site.

Source: Gerard Wright, "On Hallowed Ground." The Age, September 9, 2002.

Concluding

The evidence clearly shows that United 93 did not crash in Shanksville, PA, on 9/11. What exactly caused the crater formation? Was it conventional means, or was it directed energy weapons. I shall be exploring the evidence to support the later, and the use of Directed Energy to create the crater in Shanksville, PA.

If you haven’t already seen the documentary film I was involved with - 9/11 Alchemy “Facing Reality”, which was made about the planes on 9/11, which also explores the evidence for Directed Energy creating the crater in Shanksville, PA, along with all the strange effects which took place on 9/11 in Shanksville, PA, from Levitational effects, to electrical disturbances and iron contamination of the water, and also the crater, then please arm yourself with this knowledge.

Watch 9/11 Alchemy Facing Reality Film Below:

Thank you for reading, watching & caring!