21 Comments
User's avatar
Steve's avatar

What are your thoughts on there being no files before, during and immediately after 9/11 in the Epstein files?

9/11 Planes Research's avatar

Nothing surprises me to be honest.

There are still many documents that are classified still not been released with 9/11 investigation, and I have many declassified full of redactions. I don't expect Trump to sanction the releases anytime soon, or if ever.

Toffeetype's avatar

Jail them all.... 9/11 Murderers (no planes used at all) all Covid vaxx murderers and Those 'elite'pedos harvesting/eating kids on Epstein Island. (All Jew /Mossad /Israel satantic involvement) scum of the earth .... but WE are the 99%.

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Mark, you forgot to link.....

Simon Shack’s “MATRIX SHOT” Hoax

An Independent Investigation

Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-matrix-shot-hoax

O, and I'll add my little piece;

The Loose Change & September Clues 9/11 PSYOPS

The most important thought experiment to date

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-loose-change-911-psyop

RJ Sykes's avatar

It seems to be an open secret that it was an inside job and now they’re trying to ensure no-one gets to the bottom of what really happened.

Barca's avatar

Shack might be a total fraud but that doesn't change fact that many videos from that day show evidence of fakery. The perps would've been stupid to rely on the live use of secret tech like 3D projection. A few fx dudes in a studio would've been much more controllable.

9/11 Planes Research's avatar

Please post me some of YOUR evidence for video fakery, and the few dudes who did it?

On a side note in response. The video evidence shows that the 3D tech was not convincing from some perspectives, even people like (Les Sweeting) seeing what he took to be a rocket. I have documented those issues with the missing wing, which is not a CGI glitch either.

Barca's avatar

I just watched the videos. Some of the buildings look straight out of 90s CGI. Lighting is wrong and very low detail. Using a live technology seems really risky, much safer to do the fakes ahead of time in an editing suite.

9/11 Planes Research's avatar

You have completely ignored my question to you, asking you to provide me evidence of your claim of video fakery, as you said it was a fact?

You said: "but that doesn't change fact that many videos from that day show evidence of fakery".

Please provide me the evidence backing-up that it is a fact?

I await your reply!

Joshua M...'s avatar

Many years ago, on a site called brasschecktv.com (I think), I watched a video called "No Planes" and it seemed to have a bit more angles than this guy's video. Dunno. Not sure if it is still there for viewing.

Barca's avatar

You want time stamps or something? Sorry dude I just watched it and some of the buildings look rendered at a very low rate. Think 1992 Lawn Mower Man level graphics. Very lame honestly, we deserve better fakery.

9/11 Planes Research's avatar

So you cannot provide me with any evidence then? Please don't state things are a fact and then unable to provide me with evidence.

9/11 Planes Research's avatar

Are you here to promote video fakery in the comments section?

Have you read all my research analysis on the September Clues film and also Ace Baker's nonsense? Both have propagated disinformation.

Barca's avatar

Ok fine. 911 Alchemy 32:36. The buildings look very fake. I wouldn't have believed it either if I hadn't seen the fakery they're pulling off daily now.