September Clues Points 1 & 2 Analysis

An Independent Analysis

Introduction

This is a short article explaining some facts, which are omitted from the September Clues film, which need to be addressed. I have written extensively since 2013 about the many flawed points and alleged pieces of evidence used to present the case for “video fakery” with the second plane videos.

I have decided to undertake a point-by-point analysis of the “alleged” evidence presented by Simon Shack the maker of September Clues. I would like to present my findings in a face-to-face Zoom video debate with Simon Shack himself, in a civil debate, to allow him the opportunity to refute my findings.

I know many supporters of the September Clues film have issues with me conducting analysis on Shack’s findings, and struggle to accept my findings, and in some cases flat out ignore the evidence showing the flaws and short comings of Shack’s work. If we are to get closer to the truth, we have to update out dated belief systems once held, as painful as it is and not cling to falsehoods.

Below, Shack’s first two points in his film Analysis:

Point 1 – Only 5 shots of the 2^nd strike were shown on TV

Shack states incorrectly that only 5 live shots of the 2^nd plane strike were shown on TV. The fact is, there were 12 in total live shots of the second plane strike in real-time. Also, several local NYC stations captured the second impact through their own independent camera feeds, included in the list below:

1. WNYW (Fox 5) Chopper 5
2. NY1 from the ESB
3. WPIX-TV (WB11) from the ESB
4. ABC Chopper 880 (not 7 as commonly believed)
5. CBS
6. MSNBC
7. CNN (live on FOX 4)
8. NBC Chopper 4
9. Fox News Channel
10. CNBC (Simulcasting NBC or MSNBC)
11. WCBS (Channel 2)
12. WXTV (Univision 41)

Point 2 – CNN’s Winston Mitchell is reporting from below the towers. (1:00 Minute)

Shack incorrectly states CNN’s Winston Mitchell was reporting from below the towers. Winston Mitchell actually worked for WABC-TV as reporter in New York City on September 11, 2001, and not a CNN employee.

Shack states that Winston confirms he’s right below the Towers

The assertion by Shack is incorrect, because Winston was asked if he was on the “Northside” where the plane made contact”. Winston replies “Yes”. Winston did not say or imply he was “right below the towers”. Shack’s claim is a false. Winston was actually located on Greenwich Street & Park Place. See below map location.

Mitchell’s location was given in an interview he gave, see link below:
(Go to the 13:40 minutes for Mitchell’s account)

1. Shack makes the point that no one sees nor mentions the plane.

It is possible that the TV anchor was not watching the TV monitor briefly in the studio, and thus missed seeing the plane. This seems the case, as further into the news report the TV anchor was still unsure what had caused the explosion. Shack omits this video footage. WHY? Also, as you see later in the article, Mitchell would not have been able to see the second plane from his vantage point.

2. Shack claims that the screen “blacks out” when plane impacts the building, which is correct.

I want to clarify, the “Black Out” is not the result of human intervention, because there was a line scan as the live footage blacks out, indicating it was a transmission signal interference glitch. Shack does not say this, but later in his following points in his film, presents the “Black Out as human intervention. See the screen-shot below, showing the beginning of the line scan, which can be observed in the screen-shot below:

3. Shack claims Winston’s phone microphone doesn’t pick-up the sound of the explosion. This is correct however; Shack does not explore why this maybe the case?

There could be many reasons why Mitchell’s phone did not pick-up the explosion. Mitchell stated later in his report that he was “in a diner right now”
(Go to 3:58 minutes in the video)

If Mitchell was inside the diner as he maintains, which was located near to where he said he was on Greenwich Street & Park Place, it stands to reason why Mitchell’s phone microphone may not have picked up the explosion sound, and only picked up the ambient sound instead.

Mitchell confirmed by stating, he could see people running up the street after the explosion, which proves he was not standing below the towers as Shack claims, but also observed an explosion, and people reacting to it.

I shall be posting my analysis on Shack’s Point 3 soon. In the meantime, see all my previous analysis articles about September Clues below:

September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part One)
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception

September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part Two)
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-086

September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part Three)
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-3ff

Exposing The False Claims By Simon Shack In His Addendum Film
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/exposing-the-false-claims-by-simon

September Clues - Addendum - Deceptions - Part One
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions

September Clues - Addendum Deceptions - Part Two
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions-bcd

Simon Shack’s Amateur Effort of Video Fakery
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-amateur-effort-of-video

Simon Shack Misrepresents Plane Flight Path in 9/11 Video
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shack-misrepresents-plane-flight

Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-matrix-shot-hoax

Simon Shack’s “MATRIX SHOT” Hoax
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-matrix-shot-hoax

Simon Shack’s No-Plane Visible In The Good Day In NY Video Wide Shot Hoax
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/plane-is-visible-in-the-good-day

9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception

Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on Rich-Planet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the “alleged” video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
Link: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-layers-of-deception

Thanks for reading, watching & caring!