The Official Contradictions and Omissions of Peter Hanson's Cell Phone Calls From United Flight 175?

An Independent Analysis

In this article I cover in detail the contradictions and omissions surrounding Peter Hanson’s two phone calls placed to his father Lee Hanson on 9/11, and what it reveals.

Peter Hanson was aboard United 175, and he called his father twice. The first call was 10 minutes after the supposed hijacking. Hanson’s calls were originally attributed to a cell phone, not an airphone according to FBI document. Source: FBI TP 18 (Tampa Office). September 12, 2001 (Case ID 265D-TP-280350)

The New York Times also reported that Hanson called using his cell phone: “At some point, men armed with knives stabbed flight attendants, a cell phone caller from the plane said in several brief calls to his father in Connecticut”.

Source: AFTER THE ATTACKS: UNITED FLIGHT 175; Second Plane to Strike World Trade Center Tower Took a Deliberate Path, By WILLIAM GLABERSON, The New York Times, Published: September 13, 2001.

The Psychology of Caller ID
 
Since the introduction of caller identification, where the number of a caller is usually displayed on the read-out of an appropriately-equipped telephone set, or on the screen of a cell phone, there was an advantage having the caller IDs of the alleged distress callers from hijacked airplanes. The psychology behind this was a family member, relative or friend seeing the familiar number would reinforce a belief in the mind of the call recipient that their loved one was calling them from a known handset, or the owner of the cell-phone was calling. This also had the added advantage that what they were conveying was believable.

Peter Hanson’s second call at 9:00 a.m. (which lasted 192 seconds) presents two further problems. Peter told his father he “thought” that were going down. But at the same time, contradicting himself saying “I think they intend to go to Chicago or someplace and fly into a building”. Source: FBI 302-9269. September 11, 2001. Interview with Lee Hanson.

The contradictory nature of the information Peter was conveying is suspicious, because how could Peter have known the hijackers “intend” to fly to Chicago, and fly the plane into a building? Also, Peter could not have been aware of what had happened in New York at that time, and there is no evidence to suggest his father had informed him of what had happened in New York either in any of the FBI documents related to Lee Hanson’s accounts when interviewed. Moreover, the plane would have been in its descent at this time, contradicting why Peter said he thought they intend to fly to Chicago. It makes no sense at all.

FBI Omissions

The following facts that were conveyed from Peter to his father, which do not appear in other FBI documents from interviews with Lee Hanson, but were mysteriously omitted from the official Hanson interview were:

1. Peter had just seen a stewardess being shot.

Source: FBI CG 35. September 11, 2001 at 10:20 a.m. FBI Chicago

2. That the plane was still on the ground when Peter called.

Source: FBI AT-15449 (FBI Atlanta). September 12, 2001, 7:55 a.m.
   
The omissions of these two pieces of information is revealing, in particular, that the plane was still on the ground. This supports the evidence that the cell phone calls could not have been made in flight from the plane, and were indeed made from the plane while it was on the ground. Furthermore, it is officially reported that the phone call occurred at 09:00:03 a.m. and lasted 192 seconds (three minutes and twelve seconds), meaning the impossible, Peter’s second phone call lasted until 09:03:15, exceeding the 9/11 Commission’s United 175 crash time of 09:03:11 by four seconds. It also overshot other widely reported official crash times, such as the official seismic assured time of 09:02:54, or the 09:02:59 recorded by the National Institute of Science and Technology, by 16 and 21 seconds respectively. Suggesting even if the phone call was made from the airphone which the authorities changed it too, rather than what was originally stated in the FBI accounts of the cell phone, it would have been impossible that both the airphone or the cell phone would have still worked after crashing into the South Tower.

Concluding

The evidence on all levels for the authorities and its official narrative surrounding Peter Hanson’s phone call is very damming, and can only suggest the phone calls (if true) were made from the ground, which is why the FBI had to omit this key piece of information from public knowledge. It also reveals the phone calls were indeed scripted, and ultimately, do not match the authorities own official timeline of events.

Thanks for reading and caring!