Todd Beamer's Official Phone Records Reveal Major Discrepancies In The Official United 93 Narrative

An Independent Investigation

When we study the phone call Todd Beamer had with GTA airphone operator Lisa Jefferson, during the alleged hijacking of United 93. It is through this phone call with Jefferson that the world learned of the famous call to action “Let’s Roll”.

According to an official Department of Justice (DOJ) document in relation to United 93’s phone calls made from the airplane, Todd Beamer was connected to GTA airphone operator Lisa Jefferson at 9:43 a.m. The document also precisely states the duration of Beamer’s phone call to Jefferson to be 3925 seconds, when converted to minutes, is 65 minutes and 41 seconds. This means that Beamer’s phone call to Jefferson lasted until 10: 48 a.m., which is 45 minutes after the official crash time of United 93. See below:

Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/19987615/Mfr-Nara-t7-Doj-Doj-Briefing-on-Ua93-Calls-5-13-04-00217

According to Jefferson herself, Beamer’s phone line was left open for another 45 minutes after the crash at 10:03 a.m.

Jefferson stated:

“We didn’t lose a connection, because there’s a different sound that you use. I never lost connection it just went silent.” Source: “I Promised I wouldn’t Hang Up” beliefnet.com

The FBI stated:

“Jefferson stayed on the phone until she learned Flight 93 had crashed.”
Source: FBI FD302a – intelwire.com

This alleged scenario would have been impossible, bearing in mind that airphones are powered by the airplane’s electrical system, which is inconceivable considering, the airplane was allegedly destroyed into tiny pieces at the crash site.

Further damming “official” evidence reveals that 19 phone calls were made from Todd Beamer's cell phone after United 93 had allegedly crashed.

On September 29th 2001, Verizon Wireless provided the FBI with the following document containing a list of calls made on September 11th 2001, by a cellular mobile phone belonging to Todd Beamer, an alleged passenger on United 93.

Source: FD302a - Team 7 Box 12 - Lead Control: NK5381

Apart from the 19 “outgoing” short phone calls, which were made from Beamer’s cell phone after the “alleged” crash, there was a 21 minute “incoming” call to Beamer’s cell phone at 10:43 a.m. EST, 43 minutes after the airplane had “allegedly” crashed.

No official explanation offered by the authorities to explain the discrepancies

There has been no official explanation offered how this discrepancy occurred. The question which has to be asked is - how did Beamer make 19 cell phone calls and also receive a 21 minute phone call if the airplane had crashed?

The first piece of official airphone records suggests, the airphone which Beamer made his call to GTA supervisor Lisa Jefferson, indicates the airplane did not crash, and was either still airborne, or had landed safely.

The second piece of official cell phone records indicate that Beamer’s cell phone was still being used, and was still able to receive and make phone calls after the official crash time. This also indicates that the airplane had landed safely or had never left the ground.

Additional official telemetry data evidence supports the fact that United 93 was still airborne and flying over Champaign IL, at 10:10 a.m., 7 minutes after the official crash time, according to Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS).

According to messages #18 and #19, they were sent to the aircraft from CHIDD using the Radio Ground Stations near Champaign, IL (CMI) as designated in the line "AN N591UA/GL CMI". Both messages were sent to the printer and Message #19 also activated an audible signal in the aircraft. http://www.911myths.com/images/1/1c/Team7_Box11_FBI302s_ACARS.pdf

It is likely that United 93 may have landed in Chicago, based on Col Marr’s account that United 93 was circling over Chicago.

In the memorandums from the 9/11 Commission online release, on page 5 of this document: http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00762.pdf it states:

Note: Marr is not "connected" to ACARS, but speaks from radar data that someone informed about.

It was officially known that United 93 was still airborne after that crash

So it is was officially known that United 93 was still airborne after that crash, and possibly landed, which explain the discrepancies surrounding Beamer’s phone calls, both via the airphone and his cell phone.

No background noise during the phone calls

Interestingly, the FBI wrote; “Jefferson noted that the call had unusually low amount of background noise.”

The low background noise was also noted by Lyzbeth Glick, during her phone call she received from her husband Jeremy. See below:

Jack Grandcolas, also recalled the lack of any background noise during a phone call from his wife Lauren. See below:

There is good reason to doubt the veracity of the phone calls that were allegedly made from United 93.

Todd Beamer's Hijacking Time Discrepancy

The 9/11 Commission established the hijacking took place at 9:28 a.m. Yet Todd Beamer was connected to Jefferson at 9:43 a.m. which is 15 minutes into the hijacking. Yet the FBI report confirms Jefferson received the call from Beamer at approximately 8:45 a.m. Central Time (which is 9:45 a.m. Eastern Time). Yet the contents of Beamer’s conversation with Jefferson are at odds with the official narrative.

According to Jefferson, “Beamer called to state that the plane was about to be hijacked.” He stated, “that three individuals, two wielding knives, the third with a bomb strapped to his waist with a red belt, were preparing to take control of the flight”. Source: FBI FD302a – intelwire.com

Jefferson estimated she spoke to Beamer for 7 minutes, before two hijackers armed with knives entered the cockpit.” Source: FBI FD302a – intelwire.com

This would place the hijacking around 9:52 a.m., yet officially the hijacking took place at 9:28 a.m. This is a major discrepancy in the official story of the when the hijacking took place, which leads to the question, of how could Beamer be describing events that are supposed to be happening in front of his eyes, when in fact they had already happened approximately 25 minutes earlier?

How could the terrorists be “preparing to take control of the flight” at 9:45 a.m. when they had already been in the cockpit for 15 minutes?

Conclusion:

All the discrepancies outlined in this article indicate that Beamer was not on the airplane observing real events unfolding, but seemingly describing an imaginary pre-scripted situation, and perhaps from a different location or from the airplane which had landed, and not crashed.

It must be considered whether or not the passengers and crew were part of a hijacking training exercise scenario, either knowingly, or unknowing, where they did not know their end fate?

To find out what really happed to United 93, I would encourage readers to study my full analysis below:

Thanks for reading & caring!