Coroner Wallace Miller made some conflicting statements about the United 93 crash site. Initially, Miller is on the record saying he did not observe any blood or aircraft parts. What changed, that he would make Miller do a complete 180 degree change in his statement?
We have to seriously consider based on this documentation report, Miller’s early statement, of seeing no blood or human remains and aircraft debris at the crash site, compared to his later statements, where he said the complete opposite.
Miller was restricted by the FBI from being present at the crash site for 13 days. I can only assume that after Miller was allowed back into the site 13 days later after it was under the control of the FBI, that human remains and aircraft debris was likely planted in the 13 days Miller was absent from the crash site. I don’t believe Miller was lying in his first initial statement about his observations at the crash site. Especially if you take into account all the other eyewitnesses who observed exactly the same lack of any aircraft or bodies at the crash site.
The report reveals the 13 days absence of Miller at the crash site, and could explain why Miller said conflicting statements.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/pdfs/NIOSH-248/0248-041312-ShanksvilleResponse.pdf - (Page 5 of 70)
Thanks for reading & caring!