What Did Brian Sweeney's Phone Call Really Reveal About United Flight 175?
An Independent Investigation
In a previous article I published on 12th September 2024 called - Conclusive Evidence United 175 Was Still Airborne After We Were Told It Had Crashed. In the article I highlight that the official Aircraft Communication Addressing Radio System (ACARS) data for United 175, showed United 175 was still airborne after it had allegedly crashed into the South Tower, and was flying over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, indicating that United 175 did not make a turn to fly back into the South Tower at 9:03 a.m. as we were led to believe. Since publishing the article, I have now discovered further evidence to support that United 175 continued flying further than Pittsburgh, and possibly towards Ohio?
This new evidence has been obtained through a phone call which was alleged made from Brian Sweeney to his mother Louise at 9:00 a.m., after the phone call Sweeney made to his wife Julie at 8:58 a.m. Both phone calls would have been made when United 175 was descending rapidly heading towards the South Tower.
In Louise’s interview with the FBI, on September 11th 2001, she told the interviewing FBI agent, that she asked Brian whether he knew his location, and Brian told her, he believed “that the plane was flying over somewhere over Ohio”.
Source: FBI 302-46325, September 11, 2001. Interview Julie Sweeney
This observation by Brian also indicates that he did not notice two key elements of the official United 175 narrative. 1. The radical change of the plane’s route. 2. The dramatic change in descent of the plane towards New York. Both these two elements support the official United 175 ACARS data.
Was United 175 The Mystery Plane at Cleveland?
This new information calls into question, for the first time, whether or not the mystery plane that landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport at 10:45 a.m. could have been United 175?
Many researchers have speculated that it was United 93 that landed at Cleveland, however the mystery plane was reported as a 767, and United 93 was a 757. Plus, with all issues which I have highlighted with the official boarding of passengers onto American 11, it now poses the question whether or not American 11 passengers were re-designated onto United 175 instead, as American 11 had the same destination as United 175?
When you combine the numbers of passengers from both flights, it represents roughly 140 people. Could it have been the 140 people from (the combined) United 175 flight spotted being deplaned and led to NASA Glenn Research Center?
United 93 only had 37 passengers aboard, and the numbers are not sufficient enough, to be over estimated by the eye to stretch to 200 people, who were allegedly seen being deplaned. However, if it was the combined American 11 and United 175, combining a total of a 140 passengers, it would be a lot closer to miscall an estimate by the eye of 200 people?
This is definitely an area for further research, as it may hold the key to solving the Cleveland Airport “mystery plane”.
In closing, the evidence is now clear, United 175 did not turn around as we have been led to believe and head towards New York and crash into the South Tower, it continued flying over Harrisburg, Pittsburgh and Ohio, which is supported by the three fold official evidence.
Thanks for reading and caring!
Bottom line here, the alleged crash of "FLT175" constitutes violations of the laws of physics.
therefore, the whole "planes used as weapons" = fraud
In the second part of our riveting two-part series, Shane Skwarek and Tim Philipps continue their exploration of the events of September 11, 2001, this time focusing on United Airlines Flight 93.
Joining them is researcher Mark Conlon, who delves into the complex and often controversial narrative surrounding this infamous flight.
In this episode, we examine the following key topics:
➡️ The timeline of Flight 93 and the events leading up to its tragic crash
➡️ Eyewitness accounts that raise questions about the official story
➡️ Theories surrounding the actual crash site and whether it landed elsewhere
➡️ The role of passengers in the fight against the hijackers and their ultimate fate
➡️ Anomalies in radar data and the implications of communication failures
➡️ The significance of seismic data and magnetic interference during the crash
As the conversation unfolds, Mark highlights the discrepancies and conflicting reports that continue to challenge our understanding of Flight 93. This episode aims to shed light on the complexities of that fateful flight and encourages viewers to critically assess the narratives presented to the public.
Join us for this thought-provoking discussion as we seek to uncover the untold stories and unanswered questions about United 93. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more enlightening discussions on conspiracies and the quest for truth!
Video link: https://youtu.be/15YONJk-v_Q