Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob, the Free Radical's avatar

Bottom line here, the alleged crash of "FLT175" constitutes violations of the laws of physics.

therefore, the whole "planes used as weapons" = fraud

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

In the second part of our riveting two-part series, Shane Skwarek and Tim Philipps continue their exploration of the events of September 11, 2001, this time focusing on United Airlines Flight 93.

Joining them is researcher Mark Conlon, who delves into the complex and often controversial narrative surrounding this infamous flight.

In this episode, we examine the following key topics:

➡️ The timeline of Flight 93 and the events leading up to its tragic crash

➡️ Eyewitness accounts that raise questions about the official story

➡️ Theories surrounding the actual crash site and whether it landed elsewhere

➡️ The role of passengers in the fight against the hijackers and their ultimate fate

➡️ Anomalies in radar data and the implications of communication failures

➡️ The significance of seismic data and magnetic interference during the crash

As the conversation unfolds, Mark highlights the discrepancies and conflicting reports that continue to challenge our understanding of Flight 93. This episode aims to shed light on the complexities of that fateful flight and encourages viewers to critically assess the narratives presented to the public.

Join us for this thought-provoking discussion as we seek to uncover the untold stories and unanswered questions about United 93. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more enlightening discussions on conspiracies and the quest for truth!

Video link: https://youtu.be/15YONJk-v_Q

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts