Here's my findings regarding AA11's last lat/long coordinates. I used the DCC radar coordinates given for the plane and compared that to NORAD's. Both place Flight 11 at different parts of New York Harbor, but one thing is consistent: neither show the plane having crashed into the WTC in Lower Manhattan:
I have already done this research, which will be in my book though? Alot of it done 5 years ago? What I post here is a fraction of what I will release. I have a lot back for the books.
I was just sharing what I found out based on the information you've provided to see if they match up. Sorry if I've caused any inconvenience down the line. I hope it wasn't redundant.
Hey Jane, not at all, please keep researching, don’t be sorry. I am messages (replying) back to you from my crapy phone, and is naff trying to write decent comments. Much easier from my laptop. Plus, messages can come across wrong. Like I said, I will link and credit to YOUR info and research. I can also encourage people to subscribe to grow your Substack too. That is why, I wanted to message or discuss the plane info privately. When I am on the laptop I will Subscribe to you. I am glad that you are researching as I have been on my own trying to pick up the slack from those early researchers, who will be credited and acknowledge in my book. 👍
Also note that the DCC radar information lists AA11's last known altitude ("ALT") as 29,000 ft. ("290"). It's listed next to the final lat/long coordinates assigned to Flight 11, which we know by now does not place it at the WTC complex, either.
This is yet another problem for the official story, because American 11 was supposed to have been flying at approx. 1,300 ft. from the ground when it crashed into the North Tower at 8:46 AM. Since the Twin Towers weren't 29,000 ft. tall on 9/11, there's no way the plane could've crashed into either of them at that altitude.
Nor could it have flown consistently at 29,000 ft. towards the latter stages of its flight if it was in rapid descent minutes prior to crashing. So either the official narrative or the DCC radar data is wrong. You decide, people.
On the other hand, when asked where American 11 was, Amy Sweeney reportedly said that she could see water and buildings and that the plane was flying too low shortly before it 'crashed' into WTC1.
If what she said was true, then Flight 11 could not have been flying 29,000 ft. above Lower Manhattan at 8:46 AM. It had to have been at least ~1,000 ft. above the ground for Amy to have had a clear and close view of where she was flown over.
Either way, the DCC radar, NORAD, and Sweeney's testimony indicates to me we're looking at two planes here, with one apparently crashing into the World Trade Center and another flying past the complex and towards Washington, D.C. at a much higher altitude.
Yes, I have outlined all this info in my podcast interviews 5 years ago, including evidence that AA11 was part of a drill that was meant for the White House scenario, including the secret service reports. AA11 landed at Regan National. It has no passengers on board. Passengers were aboard another plane, that was grounded. Have you read you Sweeney’s husband’s testimony? Have you read Wayne Kirk’s interview?
Evidence shows Sweeney may not have boarded AA11, being as she phoned her husband re the delay. Look that up! The BTS indicates, AA11 didn’t take off, but the othe AA11 did. That had no passengers on it. I outlined all this in a 3 hour interview with Unite Planet in 2020, and Chris Hampton.
Yes, I'm aware of her husband's and Kirk's testimonies. Both indicate that Sweeney's flight was delayed and that AA11 had a light number of crew onboard. I know about the gate boarding issues, as well. I'm also aware of the possibility that AA11 could've landed in Washington, D.C. and was part of a White House plane crash drill. I was merely confirming for myself some of the information you've shared and decided to relay that to you to see if you agree.
And as for where AA11 could've landed, another alternative is Newark International Airport in New Jersey, where UA93 flew from. It neighbors New York and has a clear view of the WTC complex, so if Flight 11 landed immediately at some nearby airport, Newark fits the bill.
Another bombshell of an investigation. Thank you Mark!
Here's my findings regarding AA11's last lat/long coordinates. I used the DCC radar coordinates given for the plane and compared that to NORAD's. Both place Flight 11 at different parts of New York Harbor, but one thing is consistent: neither show the plane having crashed into the WTC in Lower Manhattan:
https://substack.com/@janecena/note/c-103952279
https://substack.com/profile/237056000-jane-cena/note/c-103953639
Here's my reconstruction of American 11's flight path, based on the coordinated provided by the DCC radar data and the NORAD tapes from 9/11:
https://substack.com/@janecena/note/c-104252507
You can use the above picture I created for any article you've written on AA11, so long as you credit me for the work. Take care!
I have already done this research, which will be in my book though? Alot of it done 5 years ago? What I post here is a fraction of what I will release. I have a lot back for the books.
I was just sharing what I found out based on the information you've provided to see if they match up. Sorry if I've caused any inconvenience down the line. I hope it wasn't redundant.
Hey Jane, not at all, please keep researching, don’t be sorry. I am messages (replying) back to you from my crapy phone, and is naff trying to write decent comments. Much easier from my laptop. Plus, messages can come across wrong. Like I said, I will link and credit to YOUR info and research. I can also encourage people to subscribe to grow your Substack too. That is why, I wanted to message or discuss the plane info privately. When I am on the laptop I will Subscribe to you. I am glad that you are researching as I have been on my own trying to pick up the slack from those early researchers, who will be credited and acknowledge in my book. 👍
Also note that the DCC radar information lists AA11's last known altitude ("ALT") as 29,000 ft. ("290"). It's listed next to the final lat/long coordinates assigned to Flight 11, which we know by now does not place it at the WTC complex, either.
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7597727
This is yet another problem for the official story, because American 11 was supposed to have been flying at approx. 1,300 ft. from the ground when it crashed into the North Tower at 8:46 AM. Since the Twin Towers weren't 29,000 ft. tall on 9/11, there's no way the plane could've crashed into either of them at that altitude.
Nor could it have flown consistently at 29,000 ft. towards the latter stages of its flight if it was in rapid descent minutes prior to crashing. So either the official narrative or the DCC radar data is wrong. You decide, people.
On the other hand, when asked where American 11 was, Amy Sweeney reportedly said that she could see water and buildings and that the plane was flying too low shortly before it 'crashed' into WTC1.
If what she said was true, then Flight 11 could not have been flying 29,000 ft. above Lower Manhattan at 8:46 AM. It had to have been at least ~1,000 ft. above the ground for Amy to have had a clear and close view of where she was flown over.
Either way, the DCC radar, NORAD, and Sweeney's testimony indicates to me we're looking at two planes here, with one apparently crashing into the World Trade Center and another flying past the complex and towards Washington, D.C. at a much higher altitude.
Yes, I have outlined all this info in my podcast interviews 5 years ago, including evidence that AA11 was part of a drill that was meant for the White House scenario, including the secret service reports. AA11 landed at Regan National. It has no passengers on board. Passengers were aboard another plane, that was grounded. Have you read you Sweeney’s husband’s testimony? Have you read Wayne Kirk’s interview?
Evidence shows Sweeney may not have boarded AA11, being as she phoned her husband re the delay. Look that up! The BTS indicates, AA11 didn’t take off, but the othe AA11 did. That had no passengers on it. I outlined all this in a 3 hour interview with Unite Planet in 2020, and Chris Hampton.
Yes, I'm aware of her husband's and Kirk's testimonies. Both indicate that Sweeney's flight was delayed and that AA11 had a light number of crew onboard. I know about the gate boarding issues, as well. I'm also aware of the possibility that AA11 could've landed in Washington, D.C. and was part of a White House plane crash drill. I was merely confirming for myself some of the information you've shared and decided to relay that to you to see if you agree.
And as for where AA11 could've landed, another alternative is Newark International Airport in New Jersey, where UA93 flew from. It neighbors New York and has a clear view of the WTC complex, so if Flight 11 landed immediately at some nearby airport, Newark fits the bill.