8 Comments

Another GREAT investigative article for my library, thank you!

I'll add some of mine...

Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11

Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc

Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality

Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html

YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU

Expand full comment

Hey Norman,

Add what you like. Share as you see fit. I am just doing my best to arm you and others with irrefutable evidence, that the 4 planes did not crash at the 4 named targets. I am currently working on a big write up on the 3D volumetric technology. Won't be out for awhile yet though.

Expand full comment

Can't wait to read the article...

Here is MES's video mash up, which you should possibly consider embedding in the article?

Link: https://youtu.be/aUoVE7ky3qY

Expand full comment

Note that an alleged airliner approaching a wall with the following attitude

Roll=28 deg, Pitch=3 deg, Yaw=12.5 deg, and allegedly penetrating totally

not to mention the fact that KE would diminish exponentially ( and more so . . )

as a consequence of the collision. Therefore NO airliner ever flown could have performed in a crash as was alleged 4X . . . The story of 9/11/2001 is an insult to human intelligence.

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing

Expand full comment

Thanks Jon. Good to meet you (although briefly) yesterday. Hope to catch up again soon!

Expand full comment

There have always been so many irregularities and clues in the aircraft scenario used as the official story. Most of these clues were never followed up. It’s all part of a cover-up. Thank you for the article. It was very well done

Expand full comment

Hi Ken,

Thanks for your comment. Totally agree! And thanks for your feedback, it is much appreciated.

Regards,

Mark.

Expand full comment