It is admitted in the 9/11 Commission investigation files that Mark Bingham was not assigned a seat number on board United 93.
Source: Any Report Prepared By The Chicago Field That Analyzed The Load Patterns On United Airlines Flight 175 And 93 - Responsive To Requests #35-2 (Packet #1)
Confirmation of this damming evidence of Mark Bingham not being assigned a seat number on United 93, is contained in the early version of United 93’s Flight Manifest, which also does not have Mark Bingham's name listed as a passenger aboard the flight. This obviously posed a major problem for the official narrative. Later releases of the Flight Manifest mysteriously included Mark Bingham’s name.
Alice Hoglan, Mark Bingham’s mother tried to explain to the 9/11 Commission investigative team, that her son may have been using her United Airlines employee pass, being as Alice Hoglan was a United Airlines Flight Attendant. Even if this were the case, Mark Bingham still would have been assigned a seat number as he boarded the flight. And this would have shown on the Flight Manifest, because the Flight Manifest would have been handed over to the United Airlines personnel before the flight pushed back from the gate after the plane’s door was closed.
This begs the question, whether or not Mark Bingham ever boarded United 93?
As many people may know I did a full investigation analysis of this flight, which you can read here: https://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/2020/02/what-really-happened-to-united-93.html
My analysis indicated from the “official” telemetry data that there were at least two pieces of official data which showed there were two United 93’s listed, and in the air and at two different locations at the same time. So was Mark Bingham aboard another United 93 flight? This cannot be ruled out to explain this the nonexistent assignment of a seat number, along with not being listed as a passenger on the Flight Manifest. Obviously the 9/11 Commission could never publicly reveal this information to the public, that there were indeed two United 93’s on 9/11. Perhaps the other United 93 may have been part of a war games hijacking simulation exercises, which were taking place on 9/11?
Thanks for reading and caring!
Is it not plausible that the jet fuel burned at the time of crash/explosion?
additionally we should question why the reporting on the subject of the alleged FLT93 crash includes blatant violations of the laws of physics.