7 Comments
Aug 17Liked by Mark Conlon

Is it not plausible that the jet fuel burned at the time of crash/explosion?

Expand full comment

Maybe, but I doubt all of it would have burned off. Had there been an actual plane crash near Shanksville that day, there still should've been some jet fuel contamination in the ground because they claim UA93 burrowed itself into the "soft" Pennsylvanian soil when it crashed.

The absence of jet fuel soil pollution would also explain why that famous photo of the Shanksville mushroom cloud shows it looking grey rather than acrid black or dark grey (assuming it's genuine, of course). Usually, real plane crash smoke plumes look much darker than that, like this example:

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fyau1yqp5sk031.jpg%3Fauto%3Dwebp%26s%3D42268c2bfeac5dccbdb6dab057b4c4b88865b706

Expand full comment
Aug 17·edited Aug 17Liked by Mark Conlon

additionally we should question why the reporting on the subject of the alleged FLT93 crash includes blatant violations of the laws of physics.

Expand full comment
author

IMPORTANT NOTICE! I HAVE CORRECTED SOME GRAMMATICAL ERRORS & TYPOS IN THIS ARTICLE NOW.

Expand full comment

No son rings his "mother" and announces his full name before talking with her.

Expand full comment

His mother claimed that sometimes he would introduce himself to her in that fashion. Still, not something most do to their friends and relatives in my experience.

Expand full comment

"Perhaps the other United 93 may have been part of a war games hijacking simulation exercises, which were taking place on 9/11?"

And that UA93 could've been the one that crashed near Shanksville (assuming, of course, any real plane crash took place there). I guess once they were finishing their 9/11 war games, they simply crashed that plane there while the real Flight 93 and its occupants were still at large.

Expand full comment