Mark, have any of the partners of these passengers ever received confirmation of their deaths via human remains or personal possessions(luggage, etc)? Or are the bereaved simply expected to accept that their loved ones are dead, from a “hijack crash” and 100% vanished? I ask because the two plane avenue of inquiry leads one to think that one plane crashed while the second plane took the passengers to a secret safe landing. If the passengers that day were sacrificed (as a matter of necessity) why have two planes? If a second plane carried them to safety, where are they?
Allegedly, some of the "victims'" remains from all four planes were identified and/or returned to their families, which included personal belongings. In this case, that applies to Flight 11.
Of course, there's no independent confirmation that the forensic identification done in gov't labs was accurate, so we have to take what they say with a grain of salt. Plus, we have no way of knowing that the physical evidence they show wasn't planted, such as passports and handbags allegedly retrieved from the crash sites.
Thanks a lot, glad you like it. This info was scheduled for my book, but thought it needed to be published now, although I think my Substack is well and truly shadow banned now though.
"The NTSB claimed, that the data was not reported in the confusion of the day."
Which makes no sense because two of the four hijacked planes were reported in the BTS database (Flights 175 and 93). Both were also listed as having taken off, whereas Flights 11 and 77 weren't, as we all know. What reason would the BTS have to list two of the four planes in their database if the official story was true? Why not account for all of them? Why would American Airlines care to not automatically share the info with the federal agency like United Airlines did? Do they have something to hide here?
Mark, have any of the partners of these passengers ever received confirmation of their deaths via human remains or personal possessions(luggage, etc)? Or are the bereaved simply expected to accept that their loved ones are dead, from a “hijack crash” and 100% vanished? I ask because the two plane avenue of inquiry leads one to think that one plane crashed while the second plane took the passengers to a secret safe landing. If the passengers that day were sacrificed (as a matter of necessity) why have two planes? If a second plane carried them to safety, where are they?
Allegedly, some of the "victims'" remains from all four planes were identified and/or returned to their families, which included personal belongings. In this case, that applies to Flight 11.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_DQ6jyQ5p3w
Of course, there's no independent confirmation that the forensic identification done in gov't labs was accurate, so we have to take what they say with a grain of salt. Plus, we have no way of knowing that the physical evidence they show wasn't planted, such as passports and handbags allegedly retrieved from the crash sites.
Once again - Epic research. Thank you for this...
Thanks a lot, glad you like it. This info was scheduled for my book, but thought it needed to be published now, although I think my Substack is well and truly shadow banned now though.
"The NTSB claimed, that the data was not reported in the confusion of the day."
Which makes no sense because two of the four hijacked planes were reported in the BTS database (Flights 175 and 93). Both were also listed as having taken off, whereas Flights 11 and 77 weren't, as we all know. What reason would the BTS have to list two of the four planes in their database if the official story was true? Why not account for all of them? Why would American Airlines care to not automatically share the info with the federal agency like United Airlines did? Do they have something to hide here?