Thanks for sharing my discovery of Jayhan's work on some of the 9/11 victims. The fact Menchaca's and other's pictures were created/edited before 9/11/2001 speaks volumes about the scripted nature of the attacks. It also puts into question other pieces of 'evidence' pertaining to the victims, such as the forensic identification of their remains via DNA and other means, which I believed should be looked at more closely. There's no guarantee that process wasn't premeditated or compromised as well.
I have written a bit in draft form on the DNA, but not published it yet. The only reason I remembered the EXIF data for Bingham’s CNN memorial which inspired me to publish my article about it, was because I actually listened to Fetzer’s interview in 2010 with Phil and Larry, when they appeared on Fetzer’s podcasts, as I used write in and Fetzer would ask questions to his guests for me. It popped in my head, being as I was researching Bingham story a lot recently. I still have that podcast on my hard-drives somewhere, which I am going to dig out. The only problem I had though Jayhan and Williams, they both believed the jumpers were not real people, and some other areas, like the Gelatin art group. I also tend to think Dora was at Dulles Airport on 9/11, if Gwen Faulkner’s photos are credible (which I think they are).
They were certainly wrong about the Gelatin group, and possibly the jumpers. Besides that, some of their work seems on point (such as Jayhan's and even Shack's work on the 9/11 victims' pictures).
I don’t support any of Shack’s (Hytten’s) vicsims. He has hijack that area of research, just like he did with his video fakery lies. I and others fully exposed Shack. I even showed how he removed a helicopter from Isa Fenandize’s video he posted, to say it was a fake video. Plus, how Shack was exploiting parallax, and lens registration laws of optics and covenient editing, to con people into believing all the videos were faked. Shack has made no attempts to correct his mistakes or update his work. Andrew Johnson had dealings with Shack, and if you read Andrew’s book you will see why Shack could never be trusted where 9/11 research is concerned. Simon Hytten (Shack), Ace Baker, Killtown, BS Registration, Peggy Carter, No Planer TV (Ryan Rodrigues), Nico Haupt and Steve De’ak caused major damage to the planes research, which is what their roles was to do.
Shack is a liar.
I question part of Jayhan and Williams’ research to be honest, with the hollow towers, fake jumpers and the plane pod. Like many operatives and shills, they put some nice pieces of info out, and then mix-in a load of false info to lead people off.
I thoroughly exposed Shack, Baker and De’ak on Richard D. Hall’s show in 2017.
I understand that you have qualms about Simon's work, much of which is merited. Like any disinfo agent, his role was to muddle the truth with lies regarding the artificial aspects of 9/11. But since he was one of the early pioneers of research into the manufacturing of 9/11 victims, I gave him credit where I believe it's due. Do not take what I say about him to be blind praise of the man or his contributions or me speaking out of ignorance of his sketchy track record.
I would not describe it as “qualms”, I showed how he flat-out lied, and was extremely deceptive with the information and how he presented it. One could only conclude that it was deliberately being done, and for a good reason.
Regarding my qualms. You say, “much of which is merited”?
What qualms are “not merited” then?
I have studied his vicsims, which is quite off, especially his photographic composites. Again, Shack is circulating nonsense surrounding a lot of the junk he posts on his CluesForum/Site.
Did you know Andrew gave him that webspace for free, and never thanked Andrew? And the moaned when he had to start paying for it? Shack has repeatly made false claims to discredit Dr Judy Wood. Why has Shack led an operation to discredit all the videographers, and say all the videos are CGI? And that even the street scenes were all green screen productions? With actors? Why would Shack be circulating such nonsense?
Shack said Jennefier Spell faked her video and used a backwards audio drum cymbal crash, along the a filing cabinet to emulate the sound of the plane crashing sound into the building? Why would he want to influence people to believe that?
That whole Sept Clues film was a psyop? Do you not thing he is muddying the victims info?
On a side not regarding Jayhan, and the Social Security Death Index info he quotes, that is not clear cut evidence info either. I am having serious reservations why he has included it? Bearing in mind, a lot of regular people do not get listed in it?
I'm aware of Simon's past interactions with Andrew and his thoughts on Judy Wood. He obviously hasn't gotten along well with them ever since he entered the spotlight.
Not to mention his problematic claims that all of the 9/11 footage and photos of the Towers' destruction were faked, for instance.
And to clarify some things, I think the one thing he should be credited for is that he at least inspired people to look at the victims and the visual evidence more critically, which is always a good thing to me. For all his problems, I think that's one of the few things he got right and should be given more credit for.
Regarding the Social Security Death Index, it's also true that the death master file is far from perfect or comprehensive. Even they admit this. There have been instances where dead people unrelated to 9/11 were not included in the Index for various reasons, and vice versa. So one has to proceed with caution when researching the SSDI. But despite these setbacks, it is still considered to be a highly accurate record of deaths, so it's not totally worthless.
Nonetheless, I think the anomalies with the victims' pictures highlighted by researchers such as Jayhan and 1100+ missing victims are more damning to the official story. Those are much harder to brush off than the vast majority of the victims being absent from the SSDI.
and additionally . . there is the fact that "FLT77" could not possibly have performed in a crash as was alleged by the official fairy tale, the alleged crash constitutes violations of the laws of physics.
Thanks for sharing my discovery of Jayhan's work on some of the 9/11 victims. The fact Menchaca's and other's pictures were created/edited before 9/11/2001 speaks volumes about the scripted nature of the attacks. It also puts into question other pieces of 'evidence' pertaining to the victims, such as the forensic identification of their remains via DNA and other means, which I believed should be looked at more closely. There's no guarantee that process wasn't premeditated or compromised as well.
I have written a bit in draft form on the DNA, but not published it yet. The only reason I remembered the EXIF data for Bingham’s CNN memorial which inspired me to publish my article about it, was because I actually listened to Fetzer’s interview in 2010 with Phil and Larry, when they appeared on Fetzer’s podcasts, as I used write in and Fetzer would ask questions to his guests for me. It popped in my head, being as I was researching Bingham story a lot recently. I still have that podcast on my hard-drives somewhere, which I am going to dig out. The only problem I had though Jayhan and Williams, they both believed the jumpers were not real people, and some other areas, like the Gelatin art group. I also tend to think Dora was at Dulles Airport on 9/11, if Gwen Faulkner’s photos are credible (which I think they are).
They were certainly wrong about the Gelatin group, and possibly the jumpers. Besides that, some of their work seems on point (such as Jayhan's and even Shack's work on the 9/11 victims' pictures).
I don’t support any of Shack’s (Hytten’s) vicsims. He has hijack that area of research, just like he did with his video fakery lies. I and others fully exposed Shack. I even showed how he removed a helicopter from Isa Fenandize’s video he posted, to say it was a fake video. Plus, how Shack was exploiting parallax, and lens registration laws of optics and covenient editing, to con people into believing all the videos were faked. Shack has made no attempts to correct his mistakes or update his work. Andrew Johnson had dealings with Shack, and if you read Andrew’s book you will see why Shack could never be trusted where 9/11 research is concerned. Simon Hytten (Shack), Ace Baker, Killtown, BS Registration, Peggy Carter, No Planer TV (Ryan Rodrigues), Nico Haupt and Steve De’ak caused major damage to the planes research, which is what their roles was to do.
Shack is a liar.
I question part of Jayhan and Williams’ research to be honest, with the hollow towers, fake jumpers and the plane pod. Like many operatives and shills, they put some nice pieces of info out, and then mix-in a load of false info to lead people off.
I thoroughly exposed Shack, Baker and De’ak on Richard D. Hall’s show in 2017.
I understand that you have qualms about Simon's work, much of which is merited. Like any disinfo agent, his role was to muddle the truth with lies regarding the artificial aspects of 9/11. But since he was one of the early pioneers of research into the manufacturing of 9/11 victims, I gave him credit where I believe it's due. Do not take what I say about him to be blind praise of the man or his contributions or me speaking out of ignorance of his sketchy track record.
I would not describe it as “qualms”, I showed how he flat-out lied, and was extremely deceptive with the information and how he presented it. One could only conclude that it was deliberately being done, and for a good reason.
Regarding my qualms. You say, “much of which is merited”?
What qualms are “not merited” then?
I have studied his vicsims, which is quite off, especially his photographic composites. Again, Shack is circulating nonsense surrounding a lot of the junk he posts on his CluesForum/Site.
Did you know Andrew gave him that webspace for free, and never thanked Andrew? And the moaned when he had to start paying for it? Shack has repeatly made false claims to discredit Dr Judy Wood. Why has Shack led an operation to discredit all the videographers, and say all the videos are CGI? And that even the street scenes were all green screen productions? With actors? Why would Shack be circulating such nonsense?
Shack said Jennefier Spell faked her video and used a backwards audio drum cymbal crash, along the a filing cabinet to emulate the sound of the plane crashing sound into the building? Why would he want to influence people to believe that?
That whole Sept Clues film was a psyop? Do you not thing he is muddying the victims info?
On a side not regarding Jayhan, and the Social Security Death Index info he quotes, that is not clear cut evidence info either. I am having serious reservations why he has included it? Bearing in mind, a lot of regular people do not get listed in it?
Regards!
I'm aware of Simon's past interactions with Andrew and his thoughts on Judy Wood. He obviously hasn't gotten along well with them ever since he entered the spotlight.
Not to mention his problematic claims that all of the 9/11 footage and photos of the Towers' destruction were faked, for instance.
And to clarify some things, I think the one thing he should be credited for is that he at least inspired people to look at the victims and the visual evidence more critically, which is always a good thing to me. For all his problems, I think that's one of the few things he got right and should be given more credit for.
Regarding the Social Security Death Index, it's also true that the death master file is far from perfect or comprehensive. Even they admit this. There have been instances where dead people unrelated to 9/11 were not included in the Index for various reasons, and vice versa. So one has to proceed with caution when researching the SSDI. But despite these setbacks, it is still considered to be a highly accurate record of deaths, so it's not totally worthless.
Nonetheless, I think the anomalies with the victims' pictures highlighted by researchers such as Jayhan and 1100+ missing victims are more damning to the official story. Those are much harder to brush off than the vast majority of the victims being absent from the SSDI.
and additionally . . there is the fact that "FLT77" could not possibly have performed in a crash as was alleged by the official fairy tale, the alleged crash constitutes violations of the laws of physics.