Thanks for sharing my discovery of Jayhan's work on some of the 9/11 victims. The fact Menchaca's and other's pictures were created/edited before 9/11/2001 speaks volumes about the scripted nature of the attacks. It also puts into question other pieces of 'evidence' pertaining to the victims, such as the forensic identification of their remains via DNA and other means, which I believed should be looked at more closely. There's no guarantee that process wasn't premeditated or compromised as well.
I have written a bit in draft form on the DNA, but not published it yet. The only reason I remembered the EXIF data for Bingham’s CNN memorial which inspired me to publish my article about it, was because I actually listened to Fetzer’s interview in 2010 with Phil and Larry, when they appeared on Fetzer’s podcasts, as I used write in and Fetzer would ask questions to his guests for me. It popped in my head, being as I was researching Bingham story a lot recently. I still have that podcast on my hard-drives somewhere, which I am going to dig out. The only problem I had though Jayhan and Williams, they both believed the jumpers were not real people, and some other areas, like the Gelatin art group. I also tend to think Dora was at Dulles Airport on 9/11, if Gwen Faulkner’s photos are credible (which I think they are).
They were certainly wrong about the Gelatin group, and possibly the jumpers. Besides that, some of their work seems on point (such as Jayhan's and even Shack's work on the 9/11 victims' pictures).
I don’t support any of Shack’s (Hytten’s) vicsims. He has hijack that area of research, just like he did with his video fakery lies. I and others fully exposed Shack. I even showed how he removed a helicopter from Isa Fenandize’s video he posted, to say it was a fake video. Plus, how Shack was exploiting parallax, and lens registration laws of optics and covenient editing, to con people into believing all the videos were faked. Shack has made no attempts to correct his mistakes or update his work. Andrew Johnson had dealings with Shack, and if you read Andrew’s book you will see why Shack could never be trusted where 9/11 research is concerned. Simon Hytten (Shack), Ace Baker, Killtown, BS Registration, Peggy Carter, No Planer TV (Ryan Rodrigues), Nico Haupt and Steve De’ak caused major damage to the planes research, which is what their roles was to do.
Shack is a liar.
I question part of Jayhan and Williams’ research to be honest, with the hollow towers, fake jumpers and the plane pod. Like many operatives and shills, they put some nice pieces of info out, and then mix-in a load of false info to lead people off.
I thoroughly exposed Shack, Baker and De’ak on Richard D. Hall’s show in 2017.
I understand that you have qualms about Simon's work, much of which is merited. Like any disinfo agent, his role was to muddle the truth with lies regarding the artificial aspects of 9/11. But since he was one of the early pioneers of research into the manufacturing of 9/11 victims, I gave him credit where I believe it's due. Do not take what I say about him to be blind praise of the man or his contributions or me speaking out of ignorance of his sketchy track record.
and additionally . . there is the fact that "FLT77" could not possibly have performed in a crash as was alleged by the official fairy tale, the alleged crash constitutes violations of the laws of physics.
Thanks for sharing my discovery of Jayhan's work on some of the 9/11 victims. The fact Menchaca's and other's pictures were created/edited before 9/11/2001 speaks volumes about the scripted nature of the attacks. It also puts into question other pieces of 'evidence' pertaining to the victims, such as the forensic identification of their remains via DNA and other means, which I believed should be looked at more closely. There's no guarantee that process wasn't premeditated or compromised as well.
I have written a bit in draft form on the DNA, but not published it yet. The only reason I remembered the EXIF data for Bingham’s CNN memorial which inspired me to publish my article about it, was because I actually listened to Fetzer’s interview in 2010 with Phil and Larry, when they appeared on Fetzer’s podcasts, as I used write in and Fetzer would ask questions to his guests for me. It popped in my head, being as I was researching Bingham story a lot recently. I still have that podcast on my hard-drives somewhere, which I am going to dig out. The only problem I had though Jayhan and Williams, they both believed the jumpers were not real people, and some other areas, like the Gelatin art group. I also tend to think Dora was at Dulles Airport on 9/11, if Gwen Faulkner’s photos are credible (which I think they are).
They were certainly wrong about the Gelatin group, and possibly the jumpers. Besides that, some of their work seems on point (such as Jayhan's and even Shack's work on the 9/11 victims' pictures).
I don’t support any of Shack’s (Hytten’s) vicsims. He has hijack that area of research, just like he did with his video fakery lies. I and others fully exposed Shack. I even showed how he removed a helicopter from Isa Fenandize’s video he posted, to say it was a fake video. Plus, how Shack was exploiting parallax, and lens registration laws of optics and covenient editing, to con people into believing all the videos were faked. Shack has made no attempts to correct his mistakes or update his work. Andrew Johnson had dealings with Shack, and if you read Andrew’s book you will see why Shack could never be trusted where 9/11 research is concerned. Simon Hytten (Shack), Ace Baker, Killtown, BS Registration, Peggy Carter, No Planer TV (Ryan Rodrigues), Nico Haupt and Steve De’ak caused major damage to the planes research, which is what their roles was to do.
Shack is a liar.
I question part of Jayhan and Williams’ research to be honest, with the hollow towers, fake jumpers and the plane pod. Like many operatives and shills, they put some nice pieces of info out, and then mix-in a load of false info to lead people off.
I thoroughly exposed Shack, Baker and De’ak on Richard D. Hall’s show in 2017.
I understand that you have qualms about Simon's work, much of which is merited. Like any disinfo agent, his role was to muddle the truth with lies regarding the artificial aspects of 9/11. But since he was one of the early pioneers of research into the manufacturing of 9/11 victims, I gave him credit where I believe it's due. Do not take what I say about him to be blind praise of the man or his contributions or me speaking out of ignorance of his sketchy track record.
and additionally . . there is the fact that "FLT77" could not possibly have performed in a crash as was alleged by the official fairy tale, the alleged crash constitutes violations of the laws of physics.
Superb investigative work Mark!
I never thought much about an alternative "fate" for the passengers of the airplanes aside from murder.
This stuff is mind blowing.