And how do you know that I haven't read Mark's material and that I'm trolling? Because I voiced my suspicions about Adam Eisenberg?
Step 1 - No plane could have done what was alleged for Flight 77.
You can figure it out from there and your comments are suspect themselves.
No ordinary plane, anyway. And you still haven't thoroughly explained why my comments are suspect.
Stating - "No ordinary plane" - proves you're disingenuous and have not read Mark's articles.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
And how do you know that I haven't read Mark's material and that I'm trolling? Because I voiced my suspicions about Adam Eisenberg?
Step 1 - No plane could have done what was alleged for Flight 77.
You can figure it out from there and your comments are suspect themselves.
No ordinary plane, anyway. And you still haven't thoroughly explained why my comments are suspect.
Stating - "No ordinary plane" - proves you're disingenuous and have not read Mark's articles.