Thank you for making this, I haven't watched September clues but I've gotten a few replies telling me to watch it when I say the planes were 3d projections.
Thank you, no worries. That was Shack's job, was to lead people away from ever knowing about that 3D volumetric image projection technology. He did a pretty good job for a few years until I began to see through the false info he was putting in his films. Interestingly, he has never corrected any of the errors over the years, which speaks volumes.
How can you explain the fact that the plane in Chopper 5 footage is stabilized relative to the camera, not to the world the camera was recording? That only makes sense if the plane was CGI, not if it was a real plane or another object or a hologram.
Have you checked it out for yourself with software, and know what you are being told is correct?
I have, and it is not the case if you stabilize the footage for yourself, you will find the plane is also stable. If want to believe known liars and deceivers, like Ace Baker and Simon Shack, there's not much I can say or do. They did not use CGI planes.
I would agree, but even the entry is questionable of the plane, as the plane is overlapping on the outside of the building, which does support my suggestion, if study the video evidence closely. Don't for get that was only a suggestion with a masking there I made, because Shack did not state why he was using the Luma Key. Shack only mentioned to "wash out the sky and contrast", he never states he used Luma Key as a layering mask. That was Baker who stated that in his film. I would suggest that Shack knew all too well that Baker's Luma Key was bogus, and the Luma Key brightness setting would cancel out the explosion. So Shack avoided mentioning it.
It is YOU suggesting the videos were not live, so the burden of proof falls with you to prove YOUR assertion, not me. Why you asking me to prove your assertion? This is classic fuzz logic you are applying here. So I will await YOUR evidence that the videos were NOT live.
I know several people who I have spoke with (including a videographer) who were there, including one who is a personal long time friend of mine, who seen the 2nd plane. (which was a 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology). Something which I have written extensively about over the last 11 years. This technology is real, and exists since the program was revealed in the early 1990s. I have also exposed those such as Simon Shack and Ace Baker for telling lies and misleading people with their films. I make no bones saying, that both their jobs was to steer people away from ever knowing about the technology which was used on 9/11 at ALL 4 events. Please do read ALL my research, I think you will find it very interesting! Also, check-out the background of Simon Shack and Ace Baker, I think you find their backgrounds very interesting too. Please watch 9/11 Alchemy "Facing Reality" documentary film from 2018. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iBAOMd2UMh4k/
Thank you for making this, I haven't watched September clues but I've gotten a few replies telling me to watch it when I say the planes were 3d projections.
Thank you, no worries. That was Shack's job, was to lead people away from ever knowing about that 3D volumetric image projection technology. He did a pretty good job for a few years until I began to see through the false info he was putting in his films. Interestingly, he has never corrected any of the errors over the years, which speaks volumes.
How can you explain the fact that the plane in Chopper 5 footage is stabilized relative to the camera, not to the world the camera was recording? That only makes sense if the plane was CGI, not if it was a real plane or another object or a hologram.
Who has told you that to be case and is a fact?
Have you checked it out for yourself with software, and know what you are being told is correct?
I have, and it is not the case if you stabilize the footage for yourself, you will find the plane is also stable. If want to believe known liars and deceivers, like Ace Baker and Simon Shack, there's not much I can say or do. They did not use CGI planes.
Because it would have been another way to try and mask out the plane disappearing behind the building. Either way Luma Key or Chroma Key doesn't work. This has been proven in my other post here: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/why-ace-bakers-video-fakery-compositing
I would agree, but even the entry is questionable of the plane, as the plane is overlapping on the outside of the building, which does support my suggestion, if study the video evidence closely. Don't for get that was only a suggestion with a masking there I made, because Shack did not state why he was using the Luma Key. Shack only mentioned to "wash out the sky and contrast", he never states he used Luma Key as a layering mask. That was Baker who stated that in his film. I would suggest that Shack knew all too well that Baker's Luma Key was bogus, and the Luma Key brightness setting would cancel out the explosion. So Shack avoided mentioning it.
Also, I am await your answer if you are going to join me on a Zoom video call, so we can discuss all the evidence? Yes or NO Jay?
It is YOU suggesting the videos were not live, so the burden of proof falls with you to prove YOUR assertion, not me. Why you asking me to prove your assertion? This is classic fuzz logic you are applying here. So I will await YOUR evidence that the videos were NOT live.
Reading your to and fro with 9/11 Planes research, leaves me with one conclusion.
YOU lack intellectual humility.
Luc Courchesne Video Plane Anomalies & Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
9/11 Planes Research speaks with 9/11 Revisionist
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
I know several people who I have spoke with (including a videographer) who were there, including one who is a personal long time friend of mine, who seen the 2nd plane. (which was a 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology). Something which I have written extensively about over the last 11 years. This technology is real, and exists since the program was revealed in the early 1990s. I have also exposed those such as Simon Shack and Ace Baker for telling lies and misleading people with their films. I make no bones saying, that both their jobs was to steer people away from ever knowing about the technology which was used on 9/11 at ALL 4 events. Please do read ALL my research, I think you will find it very interesting! Also, check-out the background of Simon Shack and Ace Baker, I think you find their backgrounds very interesting too. Please watch 9/11 Alchemy "Facing Reality" documentary film from 2018. https://www.bitchute.com/video/iBAOMd2UMh4k/