Missile with holographic projection really is the best explanation. As an engineer, knowing the outside of that building was lined with ibeams tells me the pictures of a plane being "absorbed" by a steel ibeam building show that cant be a real plane. Much of the light weight materials in a planes body wouldve never made it passed the outside beams and scrap pieces of aluminum wouldve been falling everywhere. Thanks for the article Mark...well done as usual.
I was cluelessly raising a family when this happened but a fellow engineer told me about wtc7 and I'm now amazed at how ignorant I really was. After just watching "✈️#911Truth Part 11: Feature Documentary: 9/11 Alchemy – Facing Reality by Wolf Clan Media", maybe there was no missile at all? That video clears up a lot so thank you and the ones that put it together. Excellent work on even exposing the truther taker over. Again, if people don't understand this stuff, they'll be clueless about Lahaina, Helene/WNC and all the rest to yet to come.
Is it possible that this kind of technology was so powerful that missiles weren't even necessary? Think about it. Missiles don't create the plane-shaped holes we see on the Twin Towers (at least not the ones they admittedly use).
The same can be said for the Pentagon and Shanksville. Speaking of which, both sites were patrolled by a C-130 military plane around the time AA77 and UA93 reportedly crashed in the two areas. This was particularly so for the third plane, which the C-130 was said to have tracked moments before the Pentagon was hit. Is it possible that this plane projected a holographic clone of AA77 flying into the Pentagon? It may even explain the odd burns we see on the alleged Pentagon victims.
I have written and spoke extensively for the last 7 years regarding those very points. Missiles don't make the Earth's magnetic field fluctuate during every plane event either. I certainly don't believe a cloaked missile hit the pentagon, nor crashed in Shanksville. The Pentagon would have needed clearance to disarm the ground to air defense system. So it would have been much easier to have just the a projection of the plane, and the same with Shanksville. The only problem with WTC North Tower is, you can see a clear shadow of a smaller object on the building's face, and also a vague shadow on the South Tower building, implying that something solid was in the air, however I have also suggested some type plasma perhaps could have caused the illusion of solidness within the projection of the image, bearing in mind that the US Navy patent I spoke about in the 9/11 Alchemy follow-up film, uses plasma as a missile decoy, and can also be used to project 3D volumetric ghost images.
Regarding C-130, they were used in training exercises before 9/11, which I have evidenced in the past, so I am very sceptical of the role in these cases involving the C-130.
Also, I have shown evidence of directed energy at both the Shanksville and the Pentagon sites. I showed in the Alchemy film in 2021 that bodies in the Pentagon looked burnt, but their clothes were un-burnt, which is highly unusual. Plus, I have shown strange on-going effects around the Pentagon site, even still happening today involving the road guard rails, and the strange rusting that is happening. Plus, the fire truck which was similar to those at the WTC site. Even had circular holes in its window.
Also, the strange on-going effects at Shanksville, with the iron contaminated water around the crash site, which is similar to the iron microspheres at the WTC.
Check out these films which I was heavily involved with:
"Regarding C-130, they were used in training exercises before 9/11, which I have evidenced in the past, so I am very sceptical of the role in these cases involving the C-130."
That explains a lot. I wouldn't be surprised if those exercises included aerial holographic projection for perception management purposes. They probably used such technology to simulate plane crashes into buildings that weren't officially attacked around or on that day, such as the NRO headquarters. That might explain why some of them are still classified.
There was also a helicopter reported nearby when Flight 77 allegedly struck the Pentagon, so that's a contender, too. Some witnesses reported seeing the helicopter disappear into the building shortly before the explosion, and one erroneously claimed the plane struck a helicopter on the heliport during the attack.
Another detail that seems to support "hologram" in this case is the fact that several witnesses described the plane melting into the Pentagon facade or being swallowed by it, which echoes what was described of the WTC planes. While I'm no expert on aircraft crash dynamics, plane crashes normally aren't so seamless, even for the high-speed ones (at least not the ones I've seen outside 9/11).
MES has also chimed in against the truth-traitors David Chandler, Richard Gage and co, pertaining to the "sway" of the South Tower which was discussed on a Boston 9/11 Zoom call in August, where the truth-traitors were trying to sell the "radio controlled" planes disinformation...
Considering the head of Lockheed Skunkworks said in the 80s that they already had the means to take ET home. That the technology in secret was over a hundred years more advanced than the tech in public. Forty years ago. How much farther have they come?
Exactly. They are way advanced to what is in the 'white world', compared to what they have developing in secret in the black budget. For some reason, people seem to be in denial that black budge projects to develop this type of technology don't exist. However, I have been trying to demonstrate to those people that the desire to develop such illusion technology exists, and that to some degree they have the type of technology used on 9/11. There again, no matter what I put in front of some people, they still reject it. I can't win!
I have to go by what I saw and what I trust is myself.
Peter Jennings a good anchor journalist and reporter dies shortly after this. I was watching his tv coverage and hearing him speak and seeing his language expressions. He knew something else in my opinion. I find his being ded highly suss.
Missile with holographic projection really is the best explanation. As an engineer, knowing the outside of that building was lined with ibeams tells me the pictures of a plane being "absorbed" by a steel ibeam building show that cant be a real plane. Much of the light weight materials in a planes body wouldve never made it passed the outside beams and scrap pieces of aluminum wouldve been falling everywhere. Thanks for the article Mark...well done as usual.
Hi Don,
Many thanks for your comment, and also your observations and sights, especially with with your background. It means a lot.
I was cluelessly raising a family when this happened but a fellow engineer told me about wtc7 and I'm now amazed at how ignorant I really was. After just watching "✈️#911Truth Part 11: Feature Documentary: 9/11 Alchemy – Facing Reality by Wolf Clan Media", maybe there was no missile at all? That video clears up a lot so thank you and the ones that put it together. Excellent work on even exposing the truther taker over. Again, if people don't understand this stuff, they'll be clueless about Lahaina, Helene/WNC and all the rest to yet to come.
Amazing post. Thank you !!
Hi Sue,
Many thanks! Glad you liked it.
Is it possible that this kind of technology was so powerful that missiles weren't even necessary? Think about it. Missiles don't create the plane-shaped holes we see on the Twin Towers (at least not the ones they admittedly use).
The same can be said for the Pentagon and Shanksville. Speaking of which, both sites were patrolled by a C-130 military plane around the time AA77 and UA93 reportedly crashed in the two areas. This was particularly so for the third plane, which the C-130 was said to have tracked moments before the Pentagon was hit. Is it possible that this plane projected a holographic clone of AA77 flying into the Pentagon? It may even explain the odd burns we see on the alleged Pentagon victims.
Hi Jane,
Yes, good points.
I have written and spoke extensively for the last 7 years regarding those very points. Missiles don't make the Earth's magnetic field fluctuate during every plane event either. I certainly don't believe a cloaked missile hit the pentagon, nor crashed in Shanksville. The Pentagon would have needed clearance to disarm the ground to air defense system. So it would have been much easier to have just the a projection of the plane, and the same with Shanksville. The only problem with WTC North Tower is, you can see a clear shadow of a smaller object on the building's face, and also a vague shadow on the South Tower building, implying that something solid was in the air, however I have also suggested some type plasma perhaps could have caused the illusion of solidness within the projection of the image, bearing in mind that the US Navy patent I spoke about in the 9/11 Alchemy follow-up film, uses plasma as a missile decoy, and can also be used to project 3D volumetric ghost images.
Regarding C-130, they were used in training exercises before 9/11, which I have evidenced in the past, so I am very sceptical of the role in these cases involving the C-130.
Also, I have shown evidence of directed energy at both the Shanksville and the Pentagon sites. I showed in the Alchemy film in 2021 that bodies in the Pentagon looked burnt, but their clothes were un-burnt, which is highly unusual. Plus, I have shown strange on-going effects around the Pentagon site, even still happening today involving the road guard rails, and the strange rusting that is happening. Plus, the fire truck which was similar to those at the WTC site. Even had circular holes in its window.
Also, the strange on-going effects at Shanksville, with the iron contaminated water around the crash site, which is similar to the iron microspheres at the WTC.
Check out these films which I was heavily involved with:
9/11 Alchemy "Facing Reality" 2018
9/11 Alchemy "A Big Idea" 2021
Thanks for your comment!
"Regarding C-130, they were used in training exercises before 9/11, which I have evidenced in the past, so I am very sceptical of the role in these cases involving the C-130."
That explains a lot. I wouldn't be surprised if those exercises included aerial holographic projection for perception management purposes. They probably used such technology to simulate plane crashes into buildings that weren't officially attacked around or on that day, such as the NRO headquarters. That might explain why some of them are still classified.
There was also a helicopter reported nearby when Flight 77 allegedly struck the Pentagon, so that's a contender, too. Some witnesses reported seeing the helicopter disappear into the building shortly before the explosion, and one erroneously claimed the plane struck a helicopter on the heliport during the attack.
Another detail that seems to support "hologram" in this case is the fact that several witnesses described the plane melting into the Pentagon facade or being swallowed by it, which echoes what was described of the WTC planes. While I'm no expert on aircraft crash dynamics, plane crashes normally aren't so seamless, even for the high-speed ones (at least not the ones I've seen outside 9/11).
EPIC article my dear sir!!!
MES has also chimed in against the truth-traitors David Chandler, Richard Gage and co, pertaining to the "sway" of the South Tower which was discussed on a Boston 9/11 Zoom call in August, where the truth-traitors were trying to sell the "radio controlled" planes disinformation...
Check it out here: https://rumble.com/v5jwqn9-discussing-the-plane-impact-dynamics-on-911..html
The delayed swaying is also in line with the delayed fireball in the unedited footage. This shouldn't happen if it had been a real plane crash.
Considering the head of Lockheed Skunkworks said in the 80s that they already had the means to take ET home. That the technology in secret was over a hundred years more advanced than the tech in public. Forty years ago. How much farther have they come?
Hi,
Exactly. They are way advanced to what is in the 'white world', compared to what they have developing in secret in the black budget. For some reason, people seem to be in denial that black budge projects to develop this type of technology don't exist. However, I have been trying to demonstrate to those people that the desire to develop such illusion technology exists, and that to some degree they have the type of technology used on 9/11. There again, no matter what I put in front of some people, they still reject it. I can't win!
Thanks for your comment!
I have to go by what I saw and what I trust is myself.
Peter Jennings a good anchor journalist and reporter dies shortly after this. I was watching his tv coverage and hearing him speak and seeing his language expressions. He knew something else in my opinion. I find his being ded highly suss.
Holy Mooooocow - Somehow, I do not believe these few fire extinguishers will be of any help!