12 Comments
User's avatar
D Fenwick's avatar

Ah Just like the smokescreen of drills on London 7/7

Expand full comment
Jared Kolb's avatar

kinda like event 201 in october 2019

Expand full comment
R!CKYRANTS's avatar

And the real Event 201 was a year prior in China. That one was the propaganda for the skeptics to chew on.

Expand full comment
Jane Cena's avatar

An example of terror drills being passed off as real events, IMO. Same can be said of shooting drills which are eerily similar to the 'real' ones.

Expand full comment
Bob, the Free Radical's avatar

Not to mention the fact that the plane crashes ( as reported . . ) would have had to violate the laws of physics in order to have been as was alleged.

Expand full comment
Bernard Doug Cook's avatar

Funny how that works, but you'll never hear it from a mute, totally compromised mainstream media!

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Looking forward to reading the deep dive article.

Expand full comment
Bronwyn's avatar

Thank you for all your research. I was wondering about the Betty Ong call. Do jumpseats have airphone access?

Expand full comment
Jane Cena's avatar

I suspect some of the 9/11 calls were probably made beforehand as part of this particular drill. Did American and United Airlines partake in this DOT exercise from late-August 2001, btw?

Expand full comment
Rebecca junco's avatar

Good work….we do care!! Keep digging and let us know what you find!!!!! We will support you by joining Substack.

Expand full comment
R!CKYRANTS's avatar

Do you think the recorded calls that were released to the public were actually from August?

Expand full comment
Bernard Doug Cook's avatar

It's already been shown in various documentaries & by tests conducted by a Japanese news outlet that cell phone calls from a rapidly moving jet airliner at 30K feet were impossible; Beamer's phone call to an airline rep was shown to have occurred AFTER the plane has already gone down!

Expand full comment