12 Comments
Commenting has been turned off for this post
D Fenwick's avatar

Ah Just like the smokescreen of drills on London 7/7

Jared Kolb's avatar

kinda like event 201 in october 2019

R!CKYRANTS's avatar

And the real Event 201 was a year prior in China. That one was the propaganda for the skeptics to chew on.

Jane Cena's avatar

An example of terror drills being passed off as real events, IMO. Same can be said of shooting drills which are eerily similar to the 'real' ones.

Bob, the Free Radical's avatar

Not to mention the fact that the plane crashes ( as reported . . ) would have had to violate the laws of physics in order to have been as was alleged.

Bernard Doug Cook's avatar

Funny how that works, but you'll never hear it from a mute, totally compromised mainstream media!

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Looking forward to reading the deep dive article.

Bronwyn's avatar

Thank you for all your research. I was wondering about the Betty Ong call. Do jumpseats have airphone access?

Jane Cena's avatar

I suspect some of the 9/11 calls were probably made beforehand as part of this particular drill. Did American and United Airlines partake in this DOT exercise from late-August 2001, btw?

Rebecca junco's avatar

Good work….we do care!! Keep digging and let us know what you find!!!!! We will support you by joining Substack.

R!CKYRANTS's avatar

Do you think the recorded calls that were released to the public were actually from August?

Bernard Doug Cook's avatar

It's already been shown in various documentaries & by tests conducted by a Japanese news outlet that cell phone calls from a rapidly moving jet airliner at 30K feet were impossible; Beamer's phone call to an airline rep was shown to have occurred AFTER the plane has already gone down!