Was The Wrong Plane Debris Planted at the Flight 93 Crash Site in Shanksville, PA?
Independent Investigation into the alleged Plane Crashes on 9/11
United 93: For some unknown reason, this piece of aircraft debris doesn’t match a Boeing 757, which was the aircraft we were led to believe crashed in Shanksville, PA on 9/11. The aircraft debris was photographed on top of a container which was housing aircraft debris which was allegedly recovered from the crash site.
What happened to this piece of debris which does not match the United Airlines aircraft that we were told crashed on 9/11? I am sure if it had of matched the aircraft it would have been on display in the Flight 93 museum. Does this suggest the wrong type of aircraft debris was planted at the scene? This piece of debris magically disappeared. There was no official documentation or chain of custody involving any of the aircraft debris from any of the 4 alleged plane crashes. Is this why, there are no debris parts officially matched by their serial numbers to the 4 named aircrafts that allegedly crashed on 9/11?
IMPORTANT UPDATE - 01/10/2025
Researcher Charlie Kallas has been following-up some lines of enquiry in relation to the photograph of the aircraft wing on top of the container in my article.
Charlie was able to make contact with one of the individuals who participated in going through “Flight 93 debris”. He has provided Charlie these some black and white photographs. See below:
According to the conversation Charlie had with the individual, the shipping containers were at an airplane graveyard, and the wing sections on top of the container were from a separate aircraft? Meaning not Flight 93 apparently.
Charlie doesn’t doubt this persons story, but if the FBI were allowing debris evidence like this to be grouped with other plane debris, this is highly suspicious.
This raises more questions than answers?
I find it highly suspicious how they put an unknown aircraft wing on top of the container, and in particular, the “Flight 93” debris container.
I have not been able obtain any “official” documentation for the chain of custody of the aircraft debris evidence that was allegedly collected, which again is highly suspicious.
We know from Aiden Monaghan’s FOIA requests, that none of the four aircraft’s debris was ever matched via serial numbers to any of the 4 named aircrafts. That in itself is questionable, why this was not carried out.
In this article, https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/stories/collecting-september-11-one-curators-story where the photograph was obtained from in my article, it references and describes the smell of jet fuel, when searching through aircraft debris in the container. This again is questionable, as it is officially on record by the EPA in their report, that there was no jet fuel contamination at the crash site, or in the plane crash crater
I asked Charlie if the individual stated where the graveyard was located?
Charlie received a response from the individual.
“You should contact United Airlines (the owner of the debris of UAL flight 93) for information on whether they still have the material and where it might be stored.”
According to Charlie, he wouldn’t even list the location he went to. I agree with Charlie, he might of signed a NDA, but not being open means there’s something to hide.
You can find Charlie’s Substack article here: UPDATE: Flight 93 Debris
[Also checkout the comments section in the article, as that is where our discussion is]
Also Charlie’s previous article: Flight 93 Debris Doesn’t Lie or Does It?
Thanks for reading & caring!







in addition to all the other evidence to be had
the laws of physics clearly indicate that no airliner ever flown could have done
what was allegedly done on 9/11/2001
And I love how that wing part didn't totally disintegrate upon impact with the ground. That in itself is a telltale sign of fraud, IMO, as plane wings aren't known to be the strongest parts of an aircraft. I wouldn't expect it to look so pristine in contrast to the rest of the rubble shown beneath it.