wow! if both 93 planes had passengers (sounds like it), were they clued in / paid off / witness protection program? or no clued in at all an' let "go" as if no detour happened?-- the story I'd heard before wuz that the PA plane wuz a red herring but the passengers were likely real an' "gassed" (easy with the air-lock) an' there's a mass grave somewharz... folks quicklimed? (apologies if ya already covered this elsewhar--there's a LOT of info ta digest!) -- an' of course the only planes that few inta the WTC were "CGI" or whatever holographic tech...
Yes it is all very strange. I do think it is very possible that they could've been gassed, or starved the passengers of oxygen. I think some passengers were part of a training hijacking simulation, which didn't end well for them. Especially like Betty Ong and Amy Sweeney on AA11. I know with UA93, it is "officially" admitted in a unclassified document, that Mark Bingham didn't even have an assigned seat number on that flight. Also, there is some very strange things going on with Compensation Fund payouts. I intend to cover a lot of my research about the passengers in the future posts. Keep an eye out for those. Thanks for commenting!!
ah, that wuz one'a my worst fears--perhaps compliance until it was too late wuz reached by tellin' 'em they were participatin' in an exercise / drill / simulation--as it seems impossible that so many (with fambiles at home) had their silence "purchased" so they too were "deleted"... there's no way to easily "compartMENTALIZE" an entire planeful of folks... I wondered about if it was carbon monoxide... or like ya said, no O2... will look out for more on this (amazin' research--the truth of course is horrific)
They wouldn't even need to have their families know what really happened to them. Those that weren't willful participants in the deception could've been misled about their whereabouts by the conspirators and most would've been none the wiser. Many low-level actors would only have a need-to-know understanding of what's going on, which reduces the likelihood of people blowing the whistle.
And when you consider that many of the planes' "victims" were gov't assets and white-collar professionals (including the hijackers, some of whom allegedly trained at U.S. military sites and held CIA visas), chances are they could've led double-lives behind their loved ones' backs. Think of them as being akin to CIA or KGB agents that were assigned pivotal roles of a lifetime. When they finished their missions, those still loyal would simply disappear under different aliases and live in relative comfort and security, provided they don't cause their handlers too much trouble.
Some argue that their remains were later planted at the official crash sites of their planes. Then again, if they wanted to kill the passengers and crew off for real, swapping planes and gassing them wouldn't have been necessary. All they had to do was simply send their planes into their official targets and call it a day. No need to plant their remains afterwards, since their remains would already be there. To me, swapping planes and staging crash sites is more compatible with faking deaths. Perhaps there were some personnel on-board those planes that they deemed too valuable to kill off (unless they disobeyed orders, of course)? Maybe there was cargo onboard those planes that they also didn't want to destroy?
And regarding the Flight 93 hijackers, I think you'll find this video about Ziad Jarrah to be quite intriguing. He seems to be an intelligence mole who was a patsy for this psyop. His family apparently has connections to the Mossad, as well as being very affluent and politically connected.
wow! if both 93 planes had passengers (sounds like it), were they clued in / paid off / witness protection program? or no clued in at all an' let "go" as if no detour happened?-- the story I'd heard before wuz that the PA plane wuz a red herring but the passengers were likely real an' "gassed" (easy with the air-lock) an' there's a mass grave somewharz... folks quicklimed? (apologies if ya already covered this elsewhar--there's a LOT of info ta digest!) -- an' of course the only planes that few inta the WTC were "CGI" or whatever holographic tech...
Yes it is all very strange. I do think it is very possible that they could've been gassed, or starved the passengers of oxygen. I think some passengers were part of a training hijacking simulation, which didn't end well for them. Especially like Betty Ong and Amy Sweeney on AA11. I know with UA93, it is "officially" admitted in a unclassified document, that Mark Bingham didn't even have an assigned seat number on that flight. Also, there is some very strange things going on with Compensation Fund payouts. I intend to cover a lot of my research about the passengers in the future posts. Keep an eye out for those. Thanks for commenting!!
ah, that wuz one'a my worst fears--perhaps compliance until it was too late wuz reached by tellin' 'em they were participatin' in an exercise / drill / simulation--as it seems impossible that so many (with fambiles at home) had their silence "purchased" so they too were "deleted"... there's no way to easily "compartMENTALIZE" an entire planeful of folks... I wondered about if it was carbon monoxide... or like ya said, no O2... will look out for more on this (amazin' research--the truth of course is horrific)
They wouldn't even need to have their families know what really happened to them. Those that weren't willful participants in the deception could've been misled about their whereabouts by the conspirators and most would've been none the wiser. Many low-level actors would only have a need-to-know understanding of what's going on, which reduces the likelihood of people blowing the whistle.
And when you consider that many of the planes' "victims" were gov't assets and white-collar professionals (including the hijackers, some of whom allegedly trained at U.S. military sites and held CIA visas), chances are they could've led double-lives behind their loved ones' backs. Think of them as being akin to CIA or KGB agents that were assigned pivotal roles of a lifetime. When they finished their missions, those still loyal would simply disappear under different aliases and live in relative comfort and security, provided they don't cause their handlers too much trouble.
Some argue that their remains were later planted at the official crash sites of their planes. Then again, if they wanted to kill the passengers and crew off for real, swapping planes and gassing them wouldn't have been necessary. All they had to do was simply send their planes into their official targets and call it a day. No need to plant their remains afterwards, since their remains would already be there. To me, swapping planes and staging crash sites is more compatible with faking deaths. Perhaps there were some personnel on-board those planes that they deemed too valuable to kill off (unless they disobeyed orders, of course)? Maybe there was cargo onboard those planes that they also didn't want to destroy?
Another whopper! Keep em coming!
And regarding the Flight 93 hijackers, I think you'll find this video about Ziad Jarrah to be quite intriguing. He seems to be an intelligence mole who was a patsy for this psyop. His family apparently has connections to the Mossad, as well as being very affluent and politically connected.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JdVFiz8TR3w