That's some great research Mark! This "Harley Guy" was one of the first curiosities that caught my attention - his delivery just seemed so scripted, rehearsed, and delivered like a pro. Later I heard that his name was Mark Walsh and was a known actor working for Fox - then it all made sense to me - or so I thought. There's something clearly sus about his detailed explanation and smooth delivery, but as you say, it's hard to know the extent of his complicity. At any rate, I would not call him a reliable witness and I don't accept he saw anything flying into the towers.
The main significance of the Harley Guy is that everything about him and his performance points to the use of “crisis actors”. And he’s just one of several examples of bogus witnesses. Did you ever see the performance by Mark Bingham’s “mother”? - another classic. How about Brian and Stanley who were supposedly in the towers and saw the plane coming towards them and hid under the desk - what a performance! How do these people live with themselves?
People will always ask, then what really happened?
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case filed presenting the evidence collected.
This textbook that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up. The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I've read a little about DEW over the years and I've seen a lot of Judy Wood's work (some of which is very impressive original work), but I don't recall learning about the following:
1. What kind of energy is it? eg. Electromagnetic, nuclear, laser, etc
2. From what and where was the energy directed? Terrestrial, satellite, aircraft, ISS, etc?
3. How was it controlled and focused? What equipment is used?
4. Are there other examples of it being used, perhaps on a smaller scale?
5. Was it exclusively DEW, or were multiple techniques used?
6. If it was a cold event, why is there so much evidence of molten steel?
The energy process Dr Wood describes is an electro gravitic nuclear reaction, akin to the slang term, “cold fusion”, akin to the work of Pons and Fleischman’s LENR - Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, WITHOUT ionising radiation.
2, 3, 4 and 5 - The best people to ask what the operator had for breakfast and who “pressed the button”, would be the 23 NIST subcontractors, who Dr Wood SUED in 2007, as two of these contractors, SAIC and ARA specialise in psychological operations, impact dynamics, weather research AND the development of DEW… They are all part of a big club - DEPS, that you might not have heard of yet.
The “molten metal” and extreme heat on the rubble pile was complete and utter misdirection and disinformation, in order to try and explain the ongoing molecular dissociation that was ongoing for 100 days AFTER 9/11.
Most people refer to the 100 days of “smoke” at ground zero. You might want to read my article covering it…
It’s high time people realise they’ve been bamboozled by architects for an engineered truth and the truth-traitor, Richard Gage and the rest of his groupies…
Read these articles - They will open your eyes.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Thanks for your detailed response and links. I'm open-minded to most possibilities and I admit I haven't done enough research on DEW. Wikipedia(lol) says "Electrogravitics has become popular with UFO, anti-gravity, and government conspiracy theorists[5] where it is seen as an example of something much more exotic than electrokinetics, i.e. that electrogravitics is a true anti-gravity technology that can "create a force that depends upon an object’s mass, even as gravity does". Now there's an invite for further investigation.
I do have one point of contention with your claims of no molten metal. Surely you've seen the molten metal pouring out the side of the tower? Surely you've seen the firefighters describing molten metal flowing like lava? Surely you've seen the witnesses of pools of molten metal that didn't cool for months? Surely you've seen the dozens of burnt-out cars? It's very difficult to accept this was a cold event, DEW or not. Do you deny the evidence of molten metal because it's inconsistent with your theory?
The last point I'll make is that of your tone. You seem overly confident and certain of the facts in what is really just speculation. And your attacks on others don't help your cause either.
totally not relevant given the fact that the airliner crashes ( that is the alleged airliner crashes ) would have had to violate the laws of physics in order to have performed as was reporte.
Mark, I’ve been trying to find more of an answer or theory of yours, 9/11 revisionist, Andrew Johnson, etc of what you make of the Michelle Doi 26 min long 911 phone call. Why is the recording that was released to public so heavily redacted? We hear her say she feels fire. But a lot is bleeped out. I wonder why..
Simon Hytten (Shack) did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception
Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on RichPlanet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the "alleged" video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
The “Loose Change” & “September Clues” movies and their producers (part of Controlled Opposition) ARE the problem.
The massive positive public value of saying 9/11 was NOT according to the official faerie tale is emptied 100% or more, by projecting grossly inaccurate alternative explanations.
Does Loose Change and September Clues come back and correct their fundamental errors?
No, because they are a major part of the Disinformation Controlled Opposition cadre.
That's some great research Mark! This "Harley Guy" was one of the first curiosities that caught my attention - his delivery just seemed so scripted, rehearsed, and delivered like a pro. Later I heard that his name was Mark Walsh and was a known actor working for Fox - then it all made sense to me - or so I thought. There's something clearly sus about his detailed explanation and smooth delivery, but as you say, it's hard to know the extent of his complicity. At any rate, I would not call him a reliable witness and I don't accept he saw anything flying into the towers.
The main significance of the Harley Guy is that everything about him and his performance points to the use of “crisis actors”. And he’s just one of several examples of bogus witnesses. Did you ever see the performance by Mark Bingham’s “mother”? - another classic. How about Brian and Stanley who were supposedly in the towers and saw the plane coming towards them and hid under the desk - what a performance! How do these people live with themselves?
People will always ask, then what really happened?
The fact of the matter is, there is no speculation on “how it went down.”
Just an independent empirical investigation of the observable evidence that has you come to an irrefutable conclusion, and it points to black-ops technology that most people just can’t fathom, because it’s too sci-fi for them to wrap their heads around it.
That’s what the perps were counting on and the 9/11 “truther” movement was installed in 2005 to have people NOT wake up to the fact.
It’s nicely chronicled in these two books – 9/11 Finding the truth and 9/11 Holding the truth.
You might also want to read the 2007 qui-tam whistle-blower case filed presenting the evidence collected.
Link: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
It was also nicely put together in this 500-page textbook.
Link: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/
This textbook that should be mandatory reading for everyone on earth.
A 500-page textbook, that the 9/11 “truther” movement DOES NOT want you to know about or read, because once you’ve read it and understand the evidence, their grift is up. The scariest 9/11 book out there: “Where did the towers go?” by Dr Judy Wood.
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/
Andrew Johnson's two FREE E-Books on 9/11:
1. 9/11 – Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
2. 9/11 – Holding the Truth - http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
I've read a little about DEW over the years and I've seen a lot of Judy Wood's work (some of which is very impressive original work), but I don't recall learning about the following:
1. What kind of energy is it? eg. Electromagnetic, nuclear, laser, etc
2. From what and where was the energy directed? Terrestrial, satellite, aircraft, ISS, etc?
3. How was it controlled and focused? What equipment is used?
4. Are there other examples of it being used, perhaps on a smaller scale?
5. Was it exclusively DEW, or were multiple techniques used?
6. If it was a cold event, why is there so much evidence of molten steel?
I would suggest you watch this presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY and then study her book: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/product/where-did-the-towers-go-by-dr-judy-wood/.
The energy process Dr Wood describes is an electro gravitic nuclear reaction, akin to the slang term, “cold fusion”, akin to the work of Pons and Fleischman’s LENR - Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, WITHOUT ionising radiation.
To understand this more, watch the documentary, 9/11 Alchemy: Free Energy & Free Thinking - https://rumble.com/v4iysuh-911-alchemy-free-energy-and-free-thinking.html
2, 3, 4 and 5 - The best people to ask what the operator had for breakfast and who “pressed the button”, would be the 23 NIST subcontractors, who Dr Wood SUED in 2007, as two of these contractors, SAIC and ARA specialise in psychological operations, impact dynamics, weather research AND the development of DEW… They are all part of a big club - DEPS, that you might not have heard of yet.
D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Molten steel - Is a complete and total fabrication, disinformation AND fake news, and is covered in Prof David A. Huges’ presentation of 9/11 evidence - https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
The “molten metal” and extreme heat on the rubble pile was complete and utter misdirection and disinformation, in order to try and explain the ongoing molecular dissociation that was ongoing for 100 days AFTER 9/11.
Most people refer to the 100 days of “smoke” at ground zero. You might want to read my article covering it…
The 100 days of "smoke" at ground zero.
The COLD rubble pile at the World Trade Center...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-100-day-fuming-and-molecular
It’s high time people realise they’ve been bamboozled by architects for an engineered truth and the truth-traitor, Richard Gage and the rest of his groupies…
Read these articles - They will open your eyes.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The TRUTH vs Stand-Down PSY-OPS
Make people believe that someone or some group external to themselves is going to "save" or "rescue" them
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-truth-vs-stand-down-psy-ops
Thanks for your detailed response and links. I'm open-minded to most possibilities and I admit I haven't done enough research on DEW. Wikipedia(lol) says "Electrogravitics has become popular with UFO, anti-gravity, and government conspiracy theorists[5] where it is seen as an example of something much more exotic than electrokinetics, i.e. that electrogravitics is a true anti-gravity technology that can "create a force that depends upon an object’s mass, even as gravity does". Now there's an invite for further investigation.
I do have one point of contention with your claims of no molten metal. Surely you've seen the molten metal pouring out the side of the tower? Surely you've seen the firefighters describing molten metal flowing like lava? Surely you've seen the witnesses of pools of molten metal that didn't cool for months? Surely you've seen the dozens of burnt-out cars? It's very difficult to accept this was a cold event, DEW or not. Do you deny the evidence of molten metal because it's inconsistent with your theory?
The last point I'll make is that of your tone. You seem overly confident and certain of the facts in what is really just speculation. And your attacks on others don't help your cause either.
Thanks for your work.
totally not relevant given the fact that the airliner crashes ( that is the alleged airliner crashes ) would have had to violate the laws of physics in order to have performed as was reporte.
Mark, I’ve been trying to find more of an answer or theory of yours, 9/11 revisionist, Andrew Johnson, etc of what you make of the Michelle Doi 26 min long 911 phone call. Why is the recording that was released to public so heavily redacted? We hear her say she feels fire. But a lot is bleeped out. I wonder why..
Simon Hytten (Shack) did work for the European Space Agency. His father worked for the United Nations and his brother had connections to the Bin Laden family....
9/11 Planes, Layers of Deception
Mark Conlon & Andrew Johnson on RichPlanet TV (Sept 2017) - 9/11 planes research into the "alleged" video fakery of Flight 175 videos.
Link: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-layers-of-deception
September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part One)
Exposing The Disinformation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception
The “Loose Change” & “September Clues” movies and their producers (part of Controlled Opposition) ARE the problem.
The massive positive public value of saying 9/11 was NOT according to the official faerie tale is emptied 100% or more, by projecting grossly inaccurate alternative explanations.
Does Loose Change and September Clues come back and correct their fundamental errors?
No, because they are a major part of the Disinformation Controlled Opposition cadre.
The Loose Change & September Clues 9/11 PSYOPS
The most important thought experiment to date
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-loose-change-911-psyop
Luckily we have a superb 9/11 documentary series, 9/11 Alchemy....
1. 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality - https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
2. 9/11 Alchemy: Free Energy & Free Thinking - https://rumble.com/v4iysuh-911-alchemy-free-energy-and-free-thinking.html
3. 9/11 Alchemy: A Big Idea - https://rumble.com/v4irvwr-911-alchemy-a-big-idea.html
YouTube playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrJGxhH8pk5H6vUVp_HawzWWz31sljYZC&si=D9ZSpdX-yh9w2rM3