9/11 Plane Passenger's Litigation & Victim Compensation Fund Inconsistences
An Independent Investigation
Introduction
Last year I wrote two articles which preface some of the information I combined in this article, which outlined glaring inconsistencies with the “official” plane passenger victim numbers and the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund payments. I have linked the two articles below, for those who wish to read them.
9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Oddities
Revisiting the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Oddities
9/11 Plane Passengers Litigation & 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund Inconsistences
The family of Mark Bavis, “alleged” passenger on United Airlines Flight 175, reached an agreement with United Airlines and Huntleigh USA, on Sept. 19, 2011, n Sept. 19, 2011, after nearly a decade of wrongful death litigation in connection with the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Bavis v. United Airlines Corporation et al.
It was claimed that the defendants were liable for airport security checkpoint failures, poor training, faulty cockpit doors and failure by the airline industry to acknowledge and adequately respond to government warnings about terrorist threats.
Following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Motley Rice launched a worldwide, private discovery effort to uncover the alleged negligence of airlines, security companies and airports in connection with the attacks.
The Litigation, representing 56 of the 96 families who choose to opt-out of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, in the hopes of gaining greater answers, accountability and recourse against the airlines and security companies responsible for the hijacked planes used in the 9/11 attacks.
Source: https://www.motleyrice.com/aviation/four-planes-911
According to the Litigation details, 56 of 96 families opted-out of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. Keep this in mind, as I will compare and contrast these numbers further on in the article.
Ellen Mariani 9/11 Lawsuit
Ellen Mariani, whose husband Louis Neil Mariani died on United Airlines Flight 175 on September 11, 2001, refused a compensation package from the government and instead sued President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, and other administration officials under the RICO Act, which is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Mariani believed that the administration had foreknowledge of the attacks and failed to act to prevent them. She also accused the administration of obstruction of justice and financial and political motivations. The lawsuit alleged that the administration allowed the attacks to happen to gather public support for a "war on terrorism". Mariani's legal battle included a lawsuit against the airlines and the federal government.
According to Bruce Leichty, attorney for Ellen Mariani, the Legal Defense Fund, based on the exhaustion of all her options in the federal court 9/11 case, Mrs. Mariani reached a settlement of all issues in her late husband’s probate case in New Hampshire in late September 2013 — more than 12 years after Louis Neil Mariani boarded the “alleged” doomed United 175. Sadly, Ellen Mariani died on October 31, 2015, apparently due to medical problems.
Source: https://marianilawsuit.wordpress.com/
9-11 Victim Compensation Fund Oddities
As I learned from the Bavis Family Litigation, 56 of 96 families opted-out of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund
The 9-11 Victim Compensation Fund is where the US government opened up the Treasury and gave family members of those who lost their lives that day lots of money. In return, these families were basically told to shut-up about anything else concerning 9-11. (Considering all the lies surrounding this horrific event, you can see why.)
Below, are the results from the Social Security Death Index 9SSDI) and 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund below for consideration.
Flight 11: of the 92 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 20 are listed in the SSDI (22%)
Of these 20 people, only three are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Judy Larocque
Laurie Neira
Candace Lee Williams
===================================
Flight 77: of the 64 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 14 are listed in the SSDI (22%)
Of these 64 people, only five on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
William Caswell
Eddie Dillard
Ian Gray
John Sammartino
Leonard Taylor
===================================
Flight 175: of the 65 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 18 are listed in the SSDI (28%)
Of these 65 people, only three are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Michael C. Tarrou
Gloria Debarrera
Timothy Ward
===================================
Flight 93: of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI (13%)
Of these 45 people, none are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list:
Not one!
===================================
Have you noticed anything strange yet? Of the passengers and crew of Flight 11, 77, 175 & 93, only 22%, 22%, 28%, 13% respectively are in the SSDI.
Of the 266 people that we were told died on these jets, only 11 relatives applied for compensation. Can you believe that not a single relative from Flight 93 applied for compensation? Were all the relatives of the victims so rich that they weren't eligible to receive compensation? No, that's not it. (The minimum federal award was $250,000, and the average pay-out was about $1.8 million. The recipients only had to make agreement: they couldn’t sue the airlines.)
You should also know that most lawyers told their clients to take the money and run (which is what most lawyers would do - take the sure money). Ellen Mariani clearly elaborated on this point during her appearance on the Black Op Radio show edition 156.
Oddly, but consistent with everything concerning 9-11, the actual complete list of the people who benefited has been omitted from this report. Even without this, it does contain an interesting fact. According to the report, 98% of all the people who suffered a loss on 9-11 took the fund money. The average payment was $1.8 million.
But here's where it gets strange. According to the government, here are the number of people who accepted the compensation fund:
Out of a total of 92 people on Flight 11, only 65 accepted the 9-11 fund (71%)
Out of a total of 65 people on Flight 175, only 46 accepted the 9-11 fund (71%)
Out of a total of 64 people on Flight 77, only 33 accepted the 9-11 fund (52%)
Out of a total of 45 people on Flight 93, only 25 accepted the 9-11 fund (56%)
These stats and figures used above were ascertained from the Pilots For 9/11 Truth forum, which is no longer active, however was archived by myself. Original Citation Reference Source: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?s=e368bd9e5a4ea21644967bfb19b4c5c9&showtopic=37&st=60
Summing up
It isn’t difficult to observe that the stats above combined with the quoted figures in the Bavis Family Litigation of 56 out of 96 families, who choose to opt-out of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund, highlight further glaring inconsistencies involving the alleged numbers quoted of deaths involving the passengers on the “alleged” 4 planes.
I shall be making a further posting about this in more detail, and what it all means. Please stay tuned!
Thanks for reading and caring.
References & Bibliography
The 9-11 Passenger List Oddity By Vincent Sammartino
https://web.archive.org/web/20160503192657/http://www.wingtv.net:80/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html
Indeed, if there were no planes, we need to know who was supposedly on them and where they went.
If, as you've shown numerous times, the four flights in question didn't really crash as reported and therefore none of the occupants died as we're told they did, that would explain why half of their relatives applied for the fund. They knew that what they were implicated in was a fraud, and thus had no reason to accept compensation for losses they didn't really suffer from.
Then again, like I suggested previously, some of them may have simply refused to accept the money because doing so came with the condition that they can't sue the gov't and/or the airlines involved for damages (e.g., Ellen Mariani). So it could be that some did lose loved ones and wanted to pursue litigation against those responsible, and knowing the VCF wouldn't allow that, simply refused to join the program.