A NIST FOIA (https://ia600502.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/19/items/911datasets/9-11-pager-messages.zip) wikileaks release, shows pager messages from 3am the day of 9/11, with lots of talks of bombs and a 3rd plane hitting the tower(s). I'm not sure if the messages went through the North Tower comms, unless they switched over after the NTower went down? Just some interesting texts to go over if anyone is interested
If you aren't aware already, it's public record that American Airlines changed a section of the Wikipedia entry about their 9/11 flights - AA11 and AA77 - by including info about them not being scheduled for that day. So they basically admitted what we've been pointing out all along.
It's also important to note that they never explain why those flights were cancelled on Sept. 11th, 2001. It would be nice to contact American Airlines and/or the BTS for an explanation behind the cancellations.
I have photographs of some passengers boarding AA77 at Gate D26, but at the same time, I have two pieces of official evidence that AA77 was not at Gate D26, and was Gate D19 or 21. The Plane which the passengers got on at D26 may have been grounded, because in the BTS data it shows that an "unknown" tail numbered plane is listed as AA77, which is listed as never taking-off.
It looks likely that some passengers and crew were part of military exercises taking place on 9/11. There's others like Mark Bingham, that were not even assigned a seat on UA93, and judging by his alleged mother's presentation on the day during interviews, it looks likely something else was at play. Even more interesting, the Compensation Fund pay outs, are very revealing also.
I am going to cover all this regarding the passengers in my book, and also in some videos this year, and it will make more sense. As it looks likely some passengers were most likely killed after reading their scripts. More to come on that though.
"As it looks likely some passengers were most likely killed after reading their scripts."
Probably those who weren't complicit insiders were offed elsewhere, or at least bullied into silence. And some of them were probably already dead prior to 9/11, such as the elderly passengers onboard.
Otherwise, if they were going to kill all the planes' occupants, anyway, they would've crashed the flights as reported. No need to fake plane crashes at all and murder them through other means.
I think regarding the plane crashes at the two towers, they could not have used real planes crashing into the towers, as they would not have had the desired effect they wanted to bring down the buildings. Meaning what we saw of the two planes crashing into the towers was not a true representation of how those 767 planes would have really looked if they would have been crashed into those buildings. That's why they had to fake the plane crashes there. The same with the Pentagon.
With all the hijacking scenarios-war game drills going on, they most likely went rogue with 4 of them at least. And those taking part were unwittingly involved not knowing their fate. Possibly others who were named maybe have been fictional characters, or as you say threatened and silenced.
I have already shown that Mark Bingham did not board United 93 using the official documents. What happened to him is another story. I just don't know, but his mother Alice came across and presented very strange considering she had just lost her son.
Thanks for your thoughts! They are always welcome! Have a good day!
"I think regarding the plane crashes at the two towers, they could not have used real planes crashing into the towers, as they would not have had the desired effect they wanted to bring down the buildings."
Not that real plane crashes alone were enough to bring down the buildings, anyway, as the Twin Towers were designed to withstand such impacts for extended periods of time, or at least long enough to allow those below the impact points to evacuate the complex (which most did). So if they wanted to immediately bring them down, real or fake planes weren't enough.
Even the official narrative maintains that the crashes alone weren't the cause of their "collapses", instead the fires presumably ignited by burning jet fuel are blamed for their destruction, which allegedly were hot enough to weaken the steel superstructure to the point of failure.
The plane crashes - real or fake - are merely cover stories for what really brought down the Twin Towers, which appear to be DEWs or something similar. They were never engineered for the sole purpose of bringing down the buildings. They were namely there for appearances.
Plus, regarding airspeed at sea or ground level, for instance, they could've had the planes fly at speeds that aren't dangerous for Boeing 757s and 767s until the last few seconds of flight.
They also could've ensured they weren't flying erratically (if the alleged phone calls from the planes were true) to lessen the likelihood of premature crashes or malfunction.
But apparently, that's not what they opted, which lends credence to the scenario that they were simulated.
Regarding Mark Bingham, I suspect he was another willful accomplice in the deception, which might explain that anomaly you mentioned. I believe the same was true for his mother.
Keep in mind that celebrities were on at least two of the flights (e.g., the Angells on AA11 and Barbara Olson on AA77), and they would normally be the last people the perps would kill as the famous are usually puppets for the power elite who will do anything to please their masters. There's no indication that those famous 9/11 "victims" were any different.
Then you had agents like Daniel Lewin on board the planes. I wouldn't consider people like him to have been "unwittingly involved not knowing their fate". Logic tells me he definitely would've known what was going down that day, as would some of the people on board all four planes.
A NIST FOIA (https://ia600502.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/19/items/911datasets/9-11-pager-messages.zip) wikileaks release, shows pager messages from 3am the day of 9/11, with lots of talks of bombs and a 3rd plane hitting the tower(s). I'm not sure if the messages went through the North Tower comms, unless they switched over after the NTower went down? Just some interesting texts to go over if anyone is interested
If you aren't aware already, it's public record that American Airlines changed a section of the Wikipedia entry about their 9/11 flights - AA11 and AA77 - by including info about them not being scheduled for that day. So they basically admitted what we've been pointing out all along.
It's also important to note that they never explain why those flights were cancelled on Sept. 11th, 2001. It would be nice to contact American Airlines and/or the BTS for an explanation behind the cancellations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=50132865
I have photographs of some passengers boarding AA77 at Gate D26, but at the same time, I have two pieces of official evidence that AA77 was not at Gate D26, and was Gate D19 or 21. The Plane which the passengers got on at D26 may have been grounded, because in the BTS data it shows that an "unknown" tail numbered plane is listed as AA77, which is listed as never taking-off.
It looks likely that some passengers and crew were part of military exercises taking place on 9/11. There's others like Mark Bingham, that were not even assigned a seat on UA93, and judging by his alleged mother's presentation on the day during interviews, it looks likely something else was at play. Even more interesting, the Compensation Fund pay outs, are very revealing also.
I am going to cover all this regarding the passengers in my book, and also in some videos this year, and it will make more sense. As it looks likely some passengers were most likely killed after reading their scripts. More to come on that though.
"As it looks likely some passengers were most likely killed after reading their scripts."
Probably those who weren't complicit insiders were offed elsewhere, or at least bullied into silence. And some of them were probably already dead prior to 9/11, such as the elderly passengers onboard.
Otherwise, if they were going to kill all the planes' occupants, anyway, they would've crashed the flights as reported. No need to fake plane crashes at all and murder them through other means.
Hi, thanks for your comment.
I think regarding the plane crashes at the two towers, they could not have used real planes crashing into the towers, as they would not have had the desired effect they wanted to bring down the buildings. Meaning what we saw of the two planes crashing into the towers was not a true representation of how those 767 planes would have really looked if they would have been crashed into those buildings. That's why they had to fake the plane crashes there. The same with the Pentagon.
With all the hijacking scenarios-war game drills going on, they most likely went rogue with 4 of them at least. And those taking part were unwittingly involved not knowing their fate. Possibly others who were named maybe have been fictional characters, or as you say threatened and silenced.
I have already shown that Mark Bingham did not board United 93 using the official documents. What happened to him is another story. I just don't know, but his mother Alice came across and presented very strange considering she had just lost her son.
Thanks for your thoughts! They are always welcome! Have a good day!
"I think regarding the plane crashes at the two towers, they could not have used real planes crashing into the towers, as they would not have had the desired effect they wanted to bring down the buildings."
Not that real plane crashes alone were enough to bring down the buildings, anyway, as the Twin Towers were designed to withstand such impacts for extended periods of time, or at least long enough to allow those below the impact points to evacuate the complex (which most did). So if they wanted to immediately bring them down, real or fake planes weren't enough.
Even the official narrative maintains that the crashes alone weren't the cause of their "collapses", instead the fires presumably ignited by burning jet fuel are blamed for their destruction, which allegedly were hot enough to weaken the steel superstructure to the point of failure.
The plane crashes - real or fake - are merely cover stories for what really brought down the Twin Towers, which appear to be DEWs or something similar. They were never engineered for the sole purpose of bringing down the buildings. They were namely there for appearances.
Plus, regarding airspeed at sea or ground level, for instance, they could've had the planes fly at speeds that aren't dangerous for Boeing 757s and 767s until the last few seconds of flight.
They also could've ensured they weren't flying erratically (if the alleged phone calls from the planes were true) to lessen the likelihood of premature crashes or malfunction.
But apparently, that's not what they opted, which lends credence to the scenario that they were simulated.
Regarding Mark Bingham, I suspect he was another willful accomplice in the deception, which might explain that anomaly you mentioned. I believe the same was true for his mother.
Keep in mind that celebrities were on at least two of the flights (e.g., the Angells on AA11 and Barbara Olson on AA77), and they would normally be the last people the perps would kill as the famous are usually puppets for the power elite who will do anything to please their masters. There's no indication that those famous 9/11 "victims" were any different.
Then you had agents like Daniel Lewin on board the planes. I wouldn't consider people like him to have been "unwittingly involved not knowing their fate". Logic tells me he definitely would've known what was going down that day, as would some of the people on board all four planes.
Probably shot
9/11 Planes, passengers and phone calls
Link: https://rumble.com/v4u48fc-911-planes-passengers-and-phone-calls.html
Flight 93 (Shanksville) Mark Bingham's mom
Link: https://rumble.com/v4rvzpe-flight-93-shanksville-mark-binghams-mom.html