Excellent piece - Thank you for this neatly laid out explanation which should wake up any person who is capable of critical thought and to challenge the beliefs they cling on to....
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
Thanks Norman. I had to correct some spelling typos, but all good now hopefully. Yes, I hope it wakes some people up who are still clinging tightly to the CGI and video fakery nonsense. Frank Goodman keeps circulating that fake video which has had the plane removed from it, as if it legitimate and authentic video footage. This is what we are dealing with. truly disgraceful that people spread such lies, presented as truth.
Frank Goodman, the tool banned me off his FB page today, because he can't handle me wiping the floor with his hero, Simon Hytten (Shack) in his comment sections...
The issues are universal with any embedded narrative that is anything but true. It means people questioning their whole reality, their ego..facing the fact that the world is nothing like they were led to believe.
I keep thinking Luc Courchène, the man that filmed the best close up of second plane impact from the base, is one doing the fakery and possibly holographics. MIT graduate specialty...holograms.
Great analysis Mark. Coherent. A missile is plausible. The wings may have 'disappeared' near the S tower when projection was blocked by N tower? My tuppence worth is nuclear demolition. Always been curious as to why first tower to be hit was second to come down. https://www.911history.de
Cheers Mark. Nearer the missile got to the towers the more difficult to get full projection onto it from say a drone or aircraft. That may be one reason why tails and wings started to disappear just before impact. If 3D projection was used there must have been prior test runs in years before 2001 Maybe UFOs were great cover?
Yes, I am totally with you, I am of the same thinking that a lot of the UFO sightings are part of the trialing of this technology before 9/11, even after also. Many thanks for your comments, it is always good to receive people's thoughts and observations.
Yes, I know about the Gelatin in the book. That clip featured there, was actually from our first film, which Chris also used in his follow up film. We covered the Gelatin relationship with the holograms, and also the cryptic side of Gelatin, and the art Group Gelatin.
Saying that, thanks for pointing this out though, and well done that you spotted it, and at least wanted to alert me to it, even though I know about it. Don't let this discourage you from pointing out anything else, as there are things we can miss. 10/10 to you!
Can these holograms act as a shield and mask the path of a missile or anything else as long the holographic image envelopes what is intended to be hidden?
I assumed that was what you were referring to when you spoke about the Pentagon… thanks.
i found your Substack account through Meryl Nass's recommendations. i have my own conjectures on what really happened on 9-11, but i take a rather radical perspective on collective reality alteration itself, not a purely technological one, at least not technological by a direct extension of known technologies developed on Earth. Thus many will likely find it highly implausible, yet i believe it to be the most fruitful path in explaining every one of the observed events and photographic evidence. And i believe seeing truth in these terms will also lead us closer to seeing the full truth behind covid and the reset.
Judy Wood certainly has the best take on the truth, particularly by directly involving her own experience of that day in her truth seeking, as well as by how she is comfortable leaving open questions rather than absolute conclusions, for many of the issues. Unlike her, i myself watched the whole drama on TV and was as embedded in the collective experience as almost everyone else. Only 4 years later when i was in the UK visiting the crop circles did someone pass me a DVD made by the French about how the plane could not fit in the hole made in the Pentagon, and i began to see the illusion, and seek the truth.
i believe the illusion was created through holographic insert technology whereby it is not a fleeting mirage w/o any substance, but rather an insert into the actual physical/emotional/mental experiential form of our collective reality. This would go for the planes as well as how the top of one of the towers started to topple off to the side, but stopped its apparent trajectory and disintegrated into fine dust, before causing a spectacle of crashing to the ground in one piece, potentially making people see it as something absurd or comical like Judy did, thereby bringing them back to their senses and question what was really happening, as she did.
Holographic insert technology i believe is what created the 200 or so Marian Apparitions (Fatima, Grabandal etc.), which could be photographed and filmed, yet different observers could see more or less of the illusion, and some nothing at all. It's probable that it had been perfected for 9-11 (with regards to optimizing the reality-sustaining frequencies involved) so that everyone saw planes hitting the buildings, yet the problems with the illusion were still recorded in the videos, as you have so diligently demonstrated.
The main feature that made it a singular collective experience, was that it was a highly charged event of unprecedented proportions that drew everyone witnessing it in the moment (both in person and on TV) into the same emotional nexus (like happens in mass hysteria). Had the holographic insert been of something less consequential to our western world's state of existence, it's likely different people would have witnessed it a bit differently, like with the Marian Apparitions. Judy Wood, for example, woke up from a dream state and immediately perceived its unlikeliness w/in normal waking reality. And not only did she continue to question it even after hearing other's experiences about its apocalyptic reality, but was impelled to thoroughly document its failings against what reality is known to be. The rest of us imprinted it as reality at the time it happened, because we were caught up in the collective emotional shock and awe of the event. And what is witnessed by someone as 'real' w/in their own standards of reality (i.e. if many people also witnessed it with them at the same time and in the same way) will become something that is quite difficult to make them change their mind about.
And now in the collective consciousness, it's just a historical fact buttressed by heroic deeds and lost lives of duty in far off places which some radicals seem to have the audacity to question. Personally i stand with Judy Wood and look with wonder at 9-11's implausibility and ask, "If that, then what next, and who in heavens could pull off something that implausible ?"
I just found this post while looking into something from Dr. Judy Woods, who is, among other things, the author of “Where Did The Towers Go?”. We need truthful answers about so many things, in order to be able to understand our reality. It appears that not too many people saw what was presented here, so I am hoping more will get a chance to read THIS information. We need to know! We need to want to know! Nothing that you believe on top of a lie has any foundation what-so-ever. When “the hard”, the tempest comes against it, it all crumbles before you. We have to question the narratives, & in this day & time, we have to question the things we THINK we see with our eyes. Very unsettling! Anyway, I’m grateful for posts like this. May God give us eyes to see ears to hear & hearts to love. 🇺🇸🙏❤️
If you read my previous articles through my Substack, I have shown the real planes were still airborne at the time of the crashes. I have also covered the passengers in detail. Why don't you have a good read through all the evidence and the "official" telemetry data, and come back with an informed comment. I asked you last time to jump on and discuss but you didn't want to. Why is that David? Yet you leave smarmy comments on my comments section. Come and discuss the evidence with me, instead of spamming my comments section.
You refuse to read the articles Mark has mentioned. It is obvious in the replies you give. Thus I am not sure how you can be expected to be taken seriously when you cannot even converse like an adult...and by adult I mean come back with something other than the one sentence above, however you did nothing of the sort, you did not impugn or repudiate anything Mark said with any kind of information, evidence, documents, interviews, studies, books, photographs...etc....etc....
Reading your comments, I am incline to call you "signature reduction"
I don't believe I have knowledge! You don't even bother to read any of the background articles and information/evidence I have written and linked to about all this. So why you spamming my comments section? You won't even have the balls to jump on and chat with me and discuss the evidence? You said you was past discussing 9/11? Yet you make smarmy comments? Well back it up and jump a Zoom call with me and discuss what your problems are with my research? Or you just here to make smarmy comments and waste my time, of something that is very important.
and if so the next step David is to discuss it logically using common sense, articulating your concerns about where Mark may be wrong, confused about the topic at hand, but no you just keep up with the useless conversation that is not going to provide any kind of conclusion, consensus or ever an 'agree to disagree'
You have no information/data to counter what Mark has put forward, furthermore what Mark has provided through his work has allowed me on my own to conclude what is most like true or not....and the reality is Mark did not create the information and data he uses to put forth what are nothing more than facts for people to think over conclude and deduce what is most likely closer to the truth than not.
Many thanks for your interjections. You are correct, he offers nothing in return, yet I am wrong on all counts. Like you say, I have never said I am right, I am student, and in my pursuit of this area have come across a lot of "official" information on all areas of the planes. Whether ACARS data, ELTs, ATC, and withheld Radar data for AA77. I have merely present evidence.
I even offered David, twice to jump on a Zoom call, but told me he does not discuss 9/11, as he is done with it. Yet, hijacks the comments section with smarmy comments? Why does he do this if he does not want to discuss 9/11? I never invited or asked him to follow me or subscribe to me.
I knew from his comment about the passengers being a hologram, that he has never read all the research I have presented regarding the passengers, or else he would not make such a smarmy type of a comment.
I think you are right that he is merely here to waste my time, and be disruptive in my pursuit to get to the bottom of what really happened involving the planes, or no planes on 9/11.
Thanks for your comment and support, it is much appreciated.
I doubt that very much! Plus, you don't seem to have read much of the evidence I have posted, or else why would you ask me such questions, and make smarmy comments about the passengers being holograms? Plus, you don't actually answer a question when I ask you a question, you just deflect a lot. So do you want to pop on a Zoom call with me, and we can discuss your problems with my research? As you seem happy making these smarmy comments, and engaging, considering you told me last week you were past engaging about 9/11 now?
The point is, why do make such comments like the "asking if the passengers holograms too"? Surely, you have seen all my research I did on the passengers? I even released CCTV footage from Dulles Airport, and I even identified many passengers at the airport on 9/11. So explain WHY you would make such a comment about passengers being holograms? Where can I find YOUR research which embeds your beliefs? Have you read all my research on the ACARS, Radar, ATC and ELTs? So why you making smarmy comments here in my comments section if you have read or bothered to read my ALL my research?
You said last week after your other smarmy comment, when challenged, that you don't discuss 9/11 anymore, but you seem keen to pass useless smarmy comments here. By the way, I am not here to convince you of anything, I certainly never asked you to subscribe or follow me. So what exactly is your business here?
A Zoom chat would be useful, as you said you have read as much as I have, so let's see exactly what you have read? Let's discuss the technical data like the ACARS and DCC radar etc, let me see what you say you know which informs your belief, which allows you to pass your smarmy comments on my posts?
Excellent piece - Thank you for this neatly laid out explanation which should wake up any person who is capable of critical thought and to challenge the beliefs they cling on to....
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11
Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Thanks Norman. I had to correct some spelling typos, but all good now hopefully. Yes, I hope it wakes some people up who are still clinging tightly to the CGI and video fakery nonsense. Frank Goodman keeps circulating that fake video which has had the plane removed from it, as if it legitimate and authentic video footage. This is what we are dealing with. truly disgraceful that people spread such lies, presented as truth.
Frank Goodman, the tool banned me off his FB page today, because he can't handle me wiping the floor with his hero, Simon Hytten (Shack) in his comment sections...
The issues are universal with any embedded narrative that is anything but true. It means people questioning their whole reality, their ego..facing the fact that the world is nothing like they were led to believe.
Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11
Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
You’re doing some amazing work!
9/11, among other things, seems like a practice run for Project Bluebeam.
It certainly seems that way CK.
I keep thinking Luc Courchène, the man that filmed the best close up of second plane impact from the base, is one doing the fakery and possibly holographics. MIT graduate specialty...holograms.
Mark Conlon, I CANNOT THANK YOU ENOUGH! Jackson Rip Holmes
Many thanks Rip, I appreciate your kind comment.
Great analysis Mark. Coherent. A missile is plausible. The wings may have 'disappeared' near the S tower when projection was blocked by N tower? My tuppence worth is nuclear demolition. Always been curious as to why first tower to be hit was second to come down. https://www.911history.de
Many thanks! Yes, it could well be missile like object with cloaking imaging. Thanks for the link.
Cheers Mark. Nearer the missile got to the towers the more difficult to get full projection onto it from say a drone or aircraft. That may be one reason why tails and wings started to disappear just before impact. If 3D projection was used there must have been prior test runs in years before 2001 Maybe UFOs were great cover?
Hi,
Yes, I am totally with you, I am of the same thinking that a lot of the UFO sightings are part of the trialing of this technology before 9/11, even after also. Many thanks for your comments, it is always good to receive people's thoughts and observations.
About 2/3 down the page, the WolfClanMedia clip, did you notice that at about 3:53 there are mentions of "gelatin" on the book page shown?
Hi,
Yes, I know about the Gelatin in the book. That clip featured there, was actually from our first film, which Chris also used in his follow up film. We covered the Gelatin relationship with the holograms, and also the cryptic side of Gelatin, and the art Group Gelatin.
Saying that, thanks for pointing this out though, and well done that you spotted it, and at least wanted to alert me to it, even though I know about it. Don't let this discourage you from pointing out anything else, as there are things we can miss. 10/10 to you!
I'm not that easily discouraged, Mark. But thanks for your kindness in being concerned. :^>
Very well put together,thank you Mark for this information.
Many thanks for your feedback.
Very interesting! The gaps they leave unanswered are the gaps that need questioning, and this is covered very well in the article.
Excellent piece!!
Can these holograms act as a shield and mask the path of a missile or anything else as long the holographic image envelopes what is intended to be hidden?
I assumed that was what you were referring to when you spoke about the Pentagon… thanks.
i found your Substack account through Meryl Nass's recommendations. i have my own conjectures on what really happened on 9-11, but i take a rather radical perspective on collective reality alteration itself, not a purely technological one, at least not technological by a direct extension of known technologies developed on Earth. Thus many will likely find it highly implausible, yet i believe it to be the most fruitful path in explaining every one of the observed events and photographic evidence. And i believe seeing truth in these terms will also lead us closer to seeing the full truth behind covid and the reset.
Judy Wood certainly has the best take on the truth, particularly by directly involving her own experience of that day in her truth seeking, as well as by how she is comfortable leaving open questions rather than absolute conclusions, for many of the issues. Unlike her, i myself watched the whole drama on TV and was as embedded in the collective experience as almost everyone else. Only 4 years later when i was in the UK visiting the crop circles did someone pass me a DVD made by the French about how the plane could not fit in the hole made in the Pentagon, and i began to see the illusion, and seek the truth.
i believe the illusion was created through holographic insert technology whereby it is not a fleeting mirage w/o any substance, but rather an insert into the actual physical/emotional/mental experiential form of our collective reality. This would go for the planes as well as how the top of one of the towers started to topple off to the side, but stopped its apparent trajectory and disintegrated into fine dust, before causing a spectacle of crashing to the ground in one piece, potentially making people see it as something absurd or comical like Judy did, thereby bringing them back to their senses and question what was really happening, as she did.
Holographic insert technology i believe is what created the 200 or so Marian Apparitions (Fatima, Grabandal etc.), which could be photographed and filmed, yet different observers could see more or less of the illusion, and some nothing at all. It's probable that it had been perfected for 9-11 (with regards to optimizing the reality-sustaining frequencies involved) so that everyone saw planes hitting the buildings, yet the problems with the illusion were still recorded in the videos, as you have so diligently demonstrated.
The main feature that made it a singular collective experience, was that it was a highly charged event of unprecedented proportions that drew everyone witnessing it in the moment (both in person and on TV) into the same emotional nexus (like happens in mass hysteria). Had the holographic insert been of something less consequential to our western world's state of existence, it's likely different people would have witnessed it a bit differently, like with the Marian Apparitions. Judy Wood, for example, woke up from a dream state and immediately perceived its unlikeliness w/in normal waking reality. And not only did she continue to question it even after hearing other's experiences about its apocalyptic reality, but was impelled to thoroughly document its failings against what reality is known to be. The rest of us imprinted it as reality at the time it happened, because we were caught up in the collective emotional shock and awe of the event. And what is witnessed by someone as 'real' w/in their own standards of reality (i.e. if many people also witnessed it with them at the same time and in the same way) will become something that is quite difficult to make them change their mind about.
And now in the collective consciousness, it's just a historical fact buttressed by heroic deeds and lost lives of duty in far off places which some radicals seem to have the audacity to question. Personally i stand with Judy Wood and look with wonder at 9-11's implausibility and ask, "If that, then what next, and who in heavens could pull off something that implausible ?"
I just found this post while looking into something from Dr. Judy Woods, who is, among other things, the author of “Where Did The Towers Go?”. We need truthful answers about so many things, in order to be able to understand our reality. It appears that not too many people saw what was presented here, so I am hoping more will get a chance to read THIS information. We need to know! We need to want to know! Nothing that you believe on top of a lie has any foundation what-so-ever. When “the hard”, the tempest comes against it, it all crumbles before you. We have to question the narratives, & in this day & time, we have to question the things we THINK we see with our eyes. Very unsettling! Anyway, I’m grateful for posts like this. May God give us eyes to see ears to hear & hearts to love. 🇺🇸🙏❤️
I assume all the crews and passengers were holographic?
If you read my previous articles through my Substack, I have shown the real planes were still airborne at the time of the crashes. I have also covered the passengers in detail. Why don't you have a good read through all the evidence and the "official" telemetry data, and come back with an informed comment. I asked you last time to jump on and discuss but you didn't want to. Why is that David? Yet you leave smarmy comments on my comments section. Come and discuss the evidence with me, instead of spamming my comments section.
Come on, you can’t actually believe this.
You refuse to read the articles Mark has mentioned. It is obvious in the replies you give. Thus I am not sure how you can be expected to be taken seriously when you cannot even converse like an adult...and by adult I mean come back with something other than the one sentence above, however you did nothing of the sort, you did not impugn or repudiate anything Mark said with any kind of information, evidence, documents, interviews, studies, books, photographs...etc....etc....
Reading your comments, I am incline to call you "signature reduction"
I don't believe I have knowledge! You don't even bother to read any of the background articles and information/evidence I have written and linked to about all this. So why you spamming my comments section? You won't even have the balls to jump on and chat with me and discuss the evidence? You said you was past discussing 9/11? Yet you make smarmy comments? Well back it up and jump a Zoom call with me and discuss what your problems are with my research? Or you just here to make smarmy comments and waste my time, of something that is very important.
I’ve read every bit as much as you, I’m sure.
and if so the next step David is to discuss it logically using common sense, articulating your concerns about where Mark may be wrong, confused about the topic at hand, but no you just keep up with the useless conversation that is not going to provide any kind of conclusion, consensus or ever an 'agree to disagree'
You have no information/data to counter what Mark has put forward, furthermore what Mark has provided through his work has allowed me on my own to conclude what is most like true or not....and the reality is Mark did not create the information and data he uses to put forth what are nothing more than facts for people to think over conclude and deduce what is most likely closer to the truth than not.
David what exactly is your purpose on substack?
Many thanks for your interjections. You are correct, he offers nothing in return, yet I am wrong on all counts. Like you say, I have never said I am right, I am student, and in my pursuit of this area have come across a lot of "official" information on all areas of the planes. Whether ACARS data, ELTs, ATC, and withheld Radar data for AA77. I have merely present evidence.
I even offered David, twice to jump on a Zoom call, but told me he does not discuss 9/11, as he is done with it. Yet, hijacks the comments section with smarmy comments? Why does he do this if he does not want to discuss 9/11? I never invited or asked him to follow me or subscribe to me.
I knew from his comment about the passengers being a hologram, that he has never read all the research I have presented regarding the passengers, or else he would not make such a smarmy type of a comment.
I think you are right that he is merely here to waste my time, and be disruptive in my pursuit to get to the bottom of what really happened involving the planes, or no planes on 9/11.
Thanks for your comment and support, it is much appreciated.
I doubt that very much! Plus, you don't seem to have read much of the evidence I have posted, or else why would you ask me such questions, and make smarmy comments about the passengers being holograms? Plus, you don't actually answer a question when I ask you a question, you just deflect a lot. So do you want to pop on a Zoom call with me, and we can discuss your problems with my research? As you seem happy making these smarmy comments, and engaging, considering you told me last week you were past engaging about 9/11 now?
You doubt that very much. I’m okay with that.
I do find it quite odd about your wanting a Zoom call so bad. That isn’t going to make me disbelieve all that which I’ve seen.
All you have 'seen' is STRANGERS who Tell A Vision.
The point is, why do make such comments like the "asking if the passengers holograms too"? Surely, you have seen all my research I did on the passengers? I even released CCTV footage from Dulles Airport, and I even identified many passengers at the airport on 9/11. So explain WHY you would make such a comment about passengers being holograms? Where can I find YOUR research which embeds your beliefs? Have you read all my research on the ACARS, Radar, ATC and ELTs? So why you making smarmy comments here in my comments section if you have read or bothered to read my ALL my research?
You said last week after your other smarmy comment, when challenged, that you don't discuss 9/11 anymore, but you seem keen to pass useless smarmy comments here. By the way, I am not here to convince you of anything, I certainly never asked you to subscribe or follow me. So what exactly is your business here?
A Zoom chat would be useful, as you said you have read as much as I have, so let's see exactly what you have read? Let's discuss the technical data like the ACARS and DCC radar etc, let me see what you say you know which informs your belief, which allows you to pass your smarmy comments on my posts?