in the case of the alleged FLT175, the attitude was as follows
Roll= 28 deg, Pitch = 3 deg, Yaw = 12.5 deg . . . with that, there is no way that the plane could have penetrated the wall as was alleged, not to mention the initial shock of contact with the wall at allegedly >500 mph would have destroyed the plane before it had any opportunity to penetrate.
in the case of the alleged FLT175, the attitude was as follows
Roll= 28 deg, Pitch = 3 deg, Yaw = 12.5 deg . . . with that, there is no way that the plane could have penetrated the wall as was alleged, not to mention the initial shock of contact with the wall at allegedly >500 mph would have destroyed the plane before it had any opportunity to penetrate.
Thanks for your info. Always good to have info like this. Also, thanks for all your comments you post reminding people of the impossible plane dynamics, speed and the impossible Newtonian physics. Truly appreciated!
in the case of the alleged FLT175, the attitude was as follows
Roll= 28 deg, Pitch = 3 deg, Yaw = 12.5 deg . . . with that, there is no way that the plane could have penetrated the wall as was alleged, not to mention the initial shock of contact with the wall at allegedly >500 mph would have destroyed the plane before it had any opportunity to penetrate.
And it was ruled out that it could not have been going that fast in the first place.
Ya, all sorts of reasons why the official story is a crock!
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your info. Always good to have info like this. Also, thanks for all your comments you post reminding people of the impossible plane dynamics, speed and the impossible Newtonian physics. Truly appreciated!