Hi, Many thanks for your comment and your insights into this. It is much appreciated. Please share more info if you have any, it is very welcome here and much needed.
if we are looking at a hologram and the wing projection did not come thru, it should project the wing somewhere else (on a different surface or building).
The light was blocked by something, if we know from which angel the lights came, we should find the missing wing ( if photograffed/filmed)
Hi, thanks for your comment, encouragement and also your insights you shared. It is very much appreciated. If your have any further info to share, it is very much welcomed here.
In hindsight and having looked at this skeptically and with an open mind it seems so obvious, yet I discounted it for many years, instead believing that airplanes did hit the towers. Thanks for your work, it makes a real difference.
After reading this and some of your other works, I began to wonder if there were any signs of propellant or exhaust residue left behind in the air before impact. Sometimes, exhaust or combusted fuel can provide clues or lead us to the type of engine that was burning it.
If you’ve already covered such a topic in your other works, please disregard this comment; it’s just my musings.
Thank you for the opportunity to express my thoughts and for the wonderful work you’re doing! 😃
in the case of the alleged FLT175, the attitude was as follows
Roll= 28 deg, Pitch = 3 deg, Yaw = 12.5 deg . . . with that, there is no way that the plane could have penetrated the wall as was alleged, not to mention the initial shock of contact with the wall at allegedly >500 mph would have destroyed the plane before it had any opportunity to penetrate.
Thanks for your info. Always good to have info like this. Also, thanks for all your comments you post reminding people of the impossible plane dynamics, speed and the impossible Newtonian physics. Truly appreciated!
Bottom line here . . . .
the crash physics clearly prove beyond any doubt that all 4 of the alleged planes were FAKE.
Tomahawk cruise missile speed 550 to 580mph Mmmm couldn't possibly be one of them? Could it ... Very likely!
Oh dear, a one winged bird 😂😂😂
CGI wouldnt work and would be easily debunked and analyized as fraud even from clued in enthusiastic amateurs..
The speed makes the possibilty of an actual plane impossible......therefore only holograms remain.
I've actualy experienced one close up in clear daylight, indistiguishable from real, except for air pressure mass disruption and sound.
The missing wing is due to atmospheric masking of the hologram at the POV of the camera distance and angle.
there is no other explanation.
Great photo.
cheers
Hi, Many thanks for your comment and your insights into this. It is much appreciated. Please share more info if you have any, it is very welcome here and much needed.
Regards!!!!
Dear Mark,
if we are looking at a hologram and the wing projection did not come thru, it should project the wing somewhere else (on a different surface or building).
The light was blocked by something, if we know from which angel the lights came, we should find the missing wing ( if photograffed/filmed)
Please succeed with the good work
Hi, thanks for your comment, encouragement and also your insights you shared. It is very much appreciated. If your have any further info to share, it is very much welcomed here.
Regards!
Epic picture - Where did you find it?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/197925557@N03/52898257047/
And All911rec YouTube Channel Community, however he has since removed it.
All911rec YouTube Channel Community.
In hindsight and having looked at this skeptically and with an open mind it seems so obvious, yet I discounted it for many years, instead believing that airplanes did hit the towers. Thanks for your work, it makes a real difference.
Hi CK, Many thanks for your kind comment and support. It is truly appreciated!
Excellent analysis.
After reading this and some of your other works, I began to wonder if there were any signs of propellant or exhaust residue left behind in the air before impact. Sometimes, exhaust or combusted fuel can provide clues or lead us to the type of engine that was burning it.
If you’ve already covered such a topic in your other works, please disregard this comment; it’s just my musings.
Thank you for the opportunity to express my thoughts and for the wonderful work you’re doing! 😃
combustion products would have dissipated VERY quickly . . .
Given that the crash physics of all 4 alleged planes proves beyond any doubt that all 4 planes were totally FAKE.
Excellent point.
Again, I was just asking because I have no knowledge or expertise on the subject, and that certainly helps my understanding.
Thank you sir!
in the case of the alleged FLT175, the attitude was as follows
Roll= 28 deg, Pitch = 3 deg, Yaw = 12.5 deg . . . with that, there is no way that the plane could have penetrated the wall as was alleged, not to mention the initial shock of contact with the wall at allegedly >500 mph would have destroyed the plane before it had any opportunity to penetrate.
And it was ruled out that it could not have been going that fast in the first place.
Ya, all sorts of reasons why the official story is a crock!
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your info. Always good to have info like this. Also, thanks for all your comments you post reminding people of the impossible plane dynamics, speed and the impossible Newtonian physics. Truly appreciated!