I have a gut feeling that something's up with him. Whether he's genuine or not is up for everybody to deduce for themselves. Even if what he's saying is true, it doesn't mean he's telling the complete truth.
I have a gut feeling that something's up with him. Whether he's genuine or not is up for everybody to deduce for themselves. Even if what he's saying is true, it doesn't mean he's telling the complete truth.
I have a gut feeling that something's up with him. Whether he's genuine or not is up for everybody to deduce for themselves. Even if what he's saying is true, it doesn't mean he's telling the complete truth.
I think you need to start reading more of Mark Conlon's substack as you obviously seem only to be here to troll the comment section...
The PentaCon on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
And how do you know that I haven't read Mark's material and that I'm trolling? Because I voiced my suspicions about Adam Eisenberg?
Step 1 - No plane could have done what was alleged for Flight 77.
You can figure it out from there and your comments are suspect themselves.
No ordinary plane, anyway. And you still haven't thoroughly explained why my comments are suspect.
Stating - "No ordinary plane" - proves you're disingenuous and have not read Mark's articles.