Many thanks for your kind comment Cindy. I really appreciate your interest, which inspires me to keep going, and to try and get closer to the truth of what really happened that day.
Another peculiar fact is the official crime statistics for 2001 did not include the almost 3,000 alleged deaths from 9/11, reportedly because the casualties were "so great that combining it with the traditional crime statistics will have an outlier effect that falsely skews all types of measurements in the program's analyses." You'd think that if they were concerned about accounting for the alleged 9/11 victims that they would've set up a different database to account for the casualties. They certainly have more than enough resources to do that, so having a separate database dedicated to documenting terrorist casualties wouldn't be an issue. Yet, I'm not aware they did so. Strange.
Even if, for instance, the plane deaths were real, that's still a small percentage of the overall casualty rate from that day. Far more people died in single plane crashes (e.g., American Airlines 191 or Japan Airlines 123) than in the four 9/11 plane crashes combined. The fact that all four planes were under-booked also lends credence to the claim they went for minimizing casualties while maximizing the effect, which includes inflating death stats. When you have fewer people involved, it's easier to kill them or fake their deaths and pay off or intimidate their families than it would be if you had planes or buildings filled to the brim with people.
It's also why the attacks were staged in the early morning hours, as less people would be in the buildings or flying, especially on Tuesdays for the latter. WTC tours were usually not hosted until 9:30-10:30 AM, so far less tourists or visitors nearby would've been killed or injured. Building 7 was reportedly completely empty when it fell several hours after the Twin Towers were destroyed, and before then most of the Twin Towers' occupants already vacated the buildings when they fell. And the vast majority of alleged WTC casualties were confined to three companies - Cantor Fitzgerald, Marsh & McClellan, and Aon. Most corporate tenants in the Twin Towers had far less reported deaths, with as little as 1 or 2 listed for many of them (e.g., Xerox or AIG).
And, of course, the Pentagon and Shanksville had even fewer reported casualties. The former had a part of its superstructure with the least amount of people inside when it was allegedly struck by AA77 (which conveniently was also under renovation), and no ground deaths were reported from the latter incident. The list goes on.
So even within the official paradigm, there were far less deaths than there otherwise would've been. The perpetrators, insiders or not, were apparently not aiming to kill as many people as humanly possible indiscriminately - which is not what one would expect from crazed, bloodthirsty kamikaze terrorists with no regard for anything besides their fanaticism. Otherwise, if they wanted to cause as many real deaths as possible, they would've done the attacks differently, involving planes with high occupancy rates, hitting their targets later in the day when more people would be inside and near their targets, striking the lower floors of the Twin Towers, delaying or obstructing the evacuation of WTC7, etc.
This is about Mark Bingham and his "legacy" yet it is brought to you by Vox Media. Suspicious.
None if the Mark Bingham websites exist anymore yet they want to keep his name "alive."
Only the rugby website exists, Bingham Cup, which is an actual rugby tournament for LGBTQ people for inclusive rugby, Mark was openly gay, which is why theres such a big deal about him and his mother Alice was an avid LGBTQ activist after her "son" died.
So much to understand, retell and offer as a knowledgeable, gift of life to those true inhabitants of our home base, the third rock from the sun... Keep blocking it out - Eventually, some one will arrive at that point. Put your mind to the grind-stone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr6Vcvl0OeU
Bless you for not giving up and continuing to expose the lies about 911. The good people of our country need to know the truth!
Many thanks for your kind comment Cindy. I really appreciate your interest, which inspires me to keep going, and to try and get closer to the truth of what really happened that day.
Another peculiar fact is the official crime statistics for 2001 did not include the almost 3,000 alleged deaths from 9/11, reportedly because the casualties were "so great that combining it with the traditional crime statistics will have an outlier effect that falsely skews all types of measurements in the program's analyses." You'd think that if they were concerned about accounting for the alleged 9/11 victims that they would've set up a different database to account for the casualties. They certainly have more than enough resources to do that, so having a separate database dedicated to documenting terrorist casualties wouldn't be an issue. Yet, I'm not aware they did so. Strange.
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2001/toc01.pdf
"Neither the FBI nor the New York City government officially recorded the casualties of the 9/11 attacks in their crime statistics for 2001, ..."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks
Make up your minds, people.
Even if, for instance, the plane deaths were real, that's still a small percentage of the overall casualty rate from that day. Far more people died in single plane crashes (e.g., American Airlines 191 or Japan Airlines 123) than in the four 9/11 plane crashes combined. The fact that all four planes were under-booked also lends credence to the claim they went for minimizing casualties while maximizing the effect, which includes inflating death stats. When you have fewer people involved, it's easier to kill them or fake their deaths and pay off or intimidate their families than it would be if you had planes or buildings filled to the brim with people.
It's also why the attacks were staged in the early morning hours, as less people would be in the buildings or flying, especially on Tuesdays for the latter. WTC tours were usually not hosted until 9:30-10:30 AM, so far less tourists or visitors nearby would've been killed or injured. Building 7 was reportedly completely empty when it fell several hours after the Twin Towers were destroyed, and before then most of the Twin Towers' occupants already vacated the buildings when they fell. And the vast majority of alleged WTC casualties were confined to three companies - Cantor Fitzgerald, Marsh & McClellan, and Aon. Most corporate tenants in the Twin Towers had far less reported deaths, with as little as 1 or 2 listed for many of them (e.g., Xerox or AIG).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks#List_of_the_dead
And, of course, the Pentagon and Shanksville had even fewer reported casualties. The former had a part of its superstructure with the least amount of people inside when it was allegedly struck by AA77 (which conveniently was also under renovation), and no ground deaths were reported from the latter incident. The list goes on.
So even within the official paradigm, there were far less deaths than there otherwise would've been. The perpetrators, insiders or not, were apparently not aiming to kill as many people as humanly possible indiscriminately - which is not what one would expect from crazed, bloodthirsty kamikaze terrorists with no regard for anything besides their fanaticism. Otherwise, if they wanted to cause as many real deaths as possible, they would've done the attacks differently, involving planes with high occupancy rates, hitting their targets later in the day when more people would be inside and near their targets, striking the lower floors of the Twin Towers, delaying or obstructing the evacuation of WTC7, etc.
https://www.californiagoldenblogs.com/pages/california-golden-blogs-hall-of-fame-mark-bingham
This is about Mark Bingham and his "legacy" yet it is brought to you by Vox Media. Suspicious.
None if the Mark Bingham websites exist anymore yet they want to keep his name "alive."
Only the rugby website exists, Bingham Cup, which is an actual rugby tournament for LGBTQ people for inclusive rugby, Mark was openly gay, which is why theres such a big deal about him and his mother Alice was an avid LGBTQ activist after her "son" died.
So much to understand, retell and offer as a knowledgeable, gift of life to those true inhabitants of our home base, the third rock from the sun... Keep blocking it out - Eventually, some one will arrive at that point. Put your mind to the grind-stone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr6Vcvl0OeU