There is about 3 pieces of official evidence shows UA93 landed at Reagan National Airport at 10:28 a.m. AA77 was over Missouri and Kansas, it seemed to disappear off radar heading back towards St Louis Airport, Missouri. AA11 was heading towards Washington, as confirmed by the NORAD communications. It seems likely it landed at Reagan National, around 9:50 a.m. I have good reason to believe AA11 was part of an exercise that was happening at the White House based on two media reports I have, when the Secret Service reported a plane had crashed into the White House at 9:46 a.m. Also, Reagan National Airport was closed for 23 days after 9/11, and the only airport to do so for that long. The only airport to do so. Reagan is located 1 mile next to the Pentagon. The fire department responded and also a structural team attended. UA175 is a bit more tricky as it was still airborne at 10:25 a.m. and over Connecticut, according to real time Flight Explorer, which was shown on MSNBC news. It seemed to be heading back to towards Boston.
Regarding Roth, she seems to have been mixing fictional elements in, which done stack up when I looked into her work. She also made quite a lot of things up about Betty Ong's phone call which incorrect unfortunately. I didn't expect to find these errors. I have tried to back-up my research using the actual telemetry data, like FOIA releases of Radar data, ATC communications transcripts, NORAD communications recordings, ACARS data, BTS and people's interviews in the investigation. Then I have tried to piece together all the information best I can and present it, and let people decide for themselves.
I hope that answers your questions? Let me know if you have anymore, as I do my best to engage with people on the comments. have a great day!
I’ve just discovered your site. I started reading Philip Marshall’s book, The Big Bamboozle but have not gotten very far. Do you have a theory of what happened to the passengers of Flight 93 and the other planes?
Thanks for the update Mark. Makes sense Re Reagan airport. Closed that long is a red flag. Yes Roth has published series of novels which she is open about are essentially fiction based on her flight experience. Did enjoy her videos years back which got me into waking up to 9/11 Think she has lower profile now. Yes stick to the evidence. Verify sources if possible. Easy to get led astray by shills. One of the finest Englishmen ever to walk the Earth, Isaac Newton, would be aghast at the cartoon physics of disappearing planes into buildings.
And, of course, the serial numbers shown from the Pentagon crash site and the FAA Inquiry database don't match. Therefore, until proven otherwise, they don't belong to the same plane.
For these to belong to the same plane, one has to assume that N644AA (Flight 77) either had more than one S/N (serial number) or it changed its serial number prior to 9/11. So far, I haven't found any evidence pointing to one or both. If there is, let me know.
Great analysis and insight Mark
Do you have any hunches where the real planes were taken ?
Do you have any thoughts with Reb Roths analysis, who seems to be specific about final destinations ?
Many thanks for kind words.
There is about 3 pieces of official evidence shows UA93 landed at Reagan National Airport at 10:28 a.m. AA77 was over Missouri and Kansas, it seemed to disappear off radar heading back towards St Louis Airport, Missouri. AA11 was heading towards Washington, as confirmed by the NORAD communications. It seems likely it landed at Reagan National, around 9:50 a.m. I have good reason to believe AA11 was part of an exercise that was happening at the White House based on two media reports I have, when the Secret Service reported a plane had crashed into the White House at 9:46 a.m. Also, Reagan National Airport was closed for 23 days after 9/11, and the only airport to do so for that long. The only airport to do so. Reagan is located 1 mile next to the Pentagon. The fire department responded and also a structural team attended. UA175 is a bit more tricky as it was still airborne at 10:25 a.m. and over Connecticut, according to real time Flight Explorer, which was shown on MSNBC news. It seemed to be heading back to towards Boston.
Regarding Roth, she seems to have been mixing fictional elements in, which done stack up when I looked into her work. She also made quite a lot of things up about Betty Ong's phone call which incorrect unfortunately. I didn't expect to find these errors. I have tried to back-up my research using the actual telemetry data, like FOIA releases of Radar data, ATC communications transcripts, NORAD communications recordings, ACARS data, BTS and people's interviews in the investigation. Then I have tried to piece together all the information best I can and present it, and let people decide for themselves.
I hope that answers your questions? Let me know if you have anymore, as I do my best to engage with people on the comments. have a great day!
I’ve just discovered your site. I started reading Philip Marshall’s book, The Big Bamboozle but have not gotten very far. Do you have a theory of what happened to the passengers of Flight 93 and the other planes?
Thanks for the update Mark. Makes sense Re Reagan airport. Closed that long is a red flag. Yes Roth has published series of novels which she is open about are essentially fiction based on her flight experience. Did enjoy her videos years back which got me into waking up to 9/11 Think she has lower profile now. Yes stick to the evidence. Verify sources if possible. Easy to get led astray by shills. One of the finest Englishmen ever to walk the Earth, Isaac Newton, would be aghast at the cartoon physics of disappearing planes into buildings.
And, of course, the serial numbers shown from the Pentagon crash site and the FAA Inquiry database don't match. Therefore, until proven otherwise, they don't belong to the same plane.
9446 or 9440:
https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/pentagon-9-11-01-1490964457.jpg
24602 (scroll to "Deregistered Aircraft"):
https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N644AA
For these to belong to the same plane, one has to assume that N644AA (Flight 77) either had more than one S/N (serial number) or it changed its serial number prior to 9/11. So far, I haven't found any evidence pointing to one or both. If there is, let me know.