Who is Gerald "Mark" Bingham?
An Independent Investigation
About a year or so ago, I came across this memorial stone of alleged United 93 passenger Mark Bingham. The stone reads Mark Bingham’s name as Gerald “Mark” Bingham?
I am trying to establish why this would be the case, that Gerald is the first name? I know that Mark Bingham’s father was named Gerald, and died some years back. However, why would they list Mark Bingham as Gerald “Mark” Bingham? Perhaps anyone in the USA reading this post can shed light on this. As far as I am aware, the other stones list the passengers name correctly, so it is comes across as odd why Mark. Bingham’s name does not. Perhaps there’s a legitimate reason for the name listing. Please contact me if anyone know more!
As I highlighted in an earlier Substack post, Mark Bingham was not assigned a seat number on United 93 according to an “official” investigative document I obtained. Also, Mark Bingham was not listed on the early version of the Flight Manifest which was released for United 93, which is inconceivable if he was on board the flight. Mark Bingham’s name would have certainly been listed on the manifest if he was indeed aboard the flight without question, due to standard operating procedures. Mark Bingham’s name only appeared on later versions of the manifest, one can only find this highly suspicious.
Thanks for reading & caring!
There is just something not right with her body language...
Flight 93 (Shanksville) Mark Bingham's mom
Mom, Alice Hoglan Is "Delighted" On The Sept 12, Today Show
Video: https://rumble.com/v4rvzpe-flight-93-shanksville-mark-binghams-mom.html
Thanks for inviting me to comment. You should be aware that I know the towers were not brought down by jet fuel fires. Mark Conlon and Jane Cena's good work have also convinced me that neither of the two aircraft that allegedly crashed into the towers actually did so. However, I'm pretty sure that pretty large flying objects went in and started fires because there were huge holes in the sides of the buildings and smoke was billowing out of them and people could be seen sitting in the broken windows at the extremities trying to get fresh air to breath. The fact that no-one in the stairwells heard explosions doesn't mean they didn't happen because those stairwells are enclosed by thick concrete walls that may well have muffled the sound of the demolition charges. As for your contention that thermite wasn't used to destroy critical structural columns, I can only assume that you hold that belief because you have not studied the structural design of the central columns as I have. As an engineer involved with the offshore oil and gas industry for over 40 years, I am very familiar with heavy steel structure designs and the massive redundancy built into them. So I know there is no way those towers could have been brought down so quickly without removing multiple sections of the main central columns SIMULTANEOUSLY. I therefore am pretty much convinced that thermite charges were attached to those columns on every floor and that these were probably attached during the elevator upgrade that was carried out shortly before 9/11. As regards the pulverisation of the concrete slabs at each level, I believe that Richard Gage's theory of superthermite coated ceiling panels is the most plausible explanation. There are maintenance records that show that nearly every ceiling had its tiles replaced in the years prior to 9/11.