I totally agree with you. She does not exhibit the presentation of grief and loss of someone who lost their son 24 hours earlier. The fact she worked for United Airlines as a Flight Attendant also raises a lot suspicion for me, as I know the military had plans for hijacking simulation scenarios for June 2002 (Amalgam Virgo 02) which included using real Delta Airline employees in a hijacking live-fly situation and the use of FBI agents also.
What a joke. Maybe the orchestrators of 9/11 were the pioneers of parading apparently happy relatives of victims in front of national TV because you saw the same kind of thing happening years later after the alleged mass shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
O, I would love to hear your thoughts on this article of mine.
The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower
Firefighters Raul Angulo and Erik Lawyer explained the holes in the narrative on Redacted, yet they are withholding important evidence about their fellow firefighters.
Listening to his loooong podcast now, he might be talking about DEW, but he's still stuck on the B/S thermite narrative as well as the CGI narrative with regards to the planes, which are the second layer to the cover-up pertaining to the impossible plane physics.
I left him a couple of messages, maybe he will correct some of his thinking...
Thanks for inviting me to comment. You should be aware that I know the towers were not brought down by jet fuel fires. Mark Conlon and Jane Cena's good work have also convinced me that neither of the two aircraft that allegedly crashed into the towers actually did so. However, I'm pretty sure that pretty large flying objects went in and started fires because there were huge holes in the sides of the buildings and smoke was billowing out of them and people could be seen sitting in the broken windows at the extremities trying to get fresh air to breath. The fact that no-one in the stairwells heard explosions doesn't mean they didn't happen because those stairwells are enclosed by thick concrete walls that may well have muffled the sound of the demolition charges. As for your contention that thermite wasn't used to destroy critical structural columns, I can only assume that you hold that belief because you have not studied the structural design of the central columns as I have. As an engineer involved with the offshore oil and gas industry for over 40 years, I am very familiar with heavy steel structure designs and the massive redundancy built into them. So I know there is no way those towers could have been brought down so quickly without removing multiple sections of the main central columns SIMULTANEOUSLY. I therefore am pretty much convinced that thermite charges were attached to those columns on every floor and that these were probably attached during the elevator upgrade that was carried out shortly before 9/11. As regards the pulverisation of the concrete slabs at each level, I believe that Richard Gage's theory of superthermite coated ceiling panels is the most plausible explanation. There are maintenance records that show that nearly every ceiling had its tiles replaced in the years prior to 9/11.
I sincerely hope you will apply some intellectual humility, especially after reading Mark's comment to you and that you will work through what I have to share with you as well.
It seems you've drunk too much of Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth's kool-aid...
You need to go back to 2005, where the 9/11 disinformation movement was formed, to steer good intentioned truth seekers AWAY from truth. Read:
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
After reading the above article, you should already see through the bullshit that is architects for an engineered truth and the truth-traitor and FRAUDSTER Richard Gage...
"As an engineer involved with the offshore oil and gas industry for over 40 years, I am very familiar with heavy steel structure designs and the massive redundancy built into them."
It seems with all your experience, you don't seem to know the basic difference between a structural failure, a conventional controlled demolition and that of a molecular disintegration of a building. I suggest you read the following article and that you listen to my presentation...
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Thanks for all those links which I will try to thoroughly review. I expect that it will take me some time so I will refrain from making any further comments until I have fully understood them.
WHY are you here promoting a known liar Richard Gage?
As a matter of fact, I have studied the destruction of ALL 7 WTC buildings on 9/11, and most likely in far more depth than yourself.
Neither WTC 1 or 2 buildings were destroyed by fires, jet fuel or an induced global collapse. Neither was they destroyed by thermite or a controlled demolition.
David, I do not hold any "beliefs" I only follow the "evidence" and have "knowledge" not "beliefs" of how "ALL 7" buildings were destroyed on 9/11 not just 3.
Thermite had nothing to do with how the towers were destroyed, this lie was propagated by another known liar Steve E. jones, who has done work for the government, such as the Department of Energy. Steve E. Jones was also involved and key to covering up Cold Fusion, which proved free energy. Thermite was a deliberate cover-story, to cover-up what really destroyed the towers, turning them into dust from the top down.
Please understand and be aware that 85% to 90% of both WTC towers were missing, because they were turned to dust, and did not hit the ground. Observable video and photographic evidence shows this to be a fact (not a belief). In photos and videos on 9/11, there was hardly any rubble pile to be observed, which was only about to the WTC lobby level.
The towers turning to dust from the top down is also proven by the seismic data readings for both WTC 1 & 2, which were 2.3 and 2.1, which is completely inconsistent with what we should expect of those two buildings. Also, the seismic data proves a controlled demolition or global collapse was not involved. The evidential indicator for this is the seismic readings did not contain S or P waves? Question; Do you understand the significance of this information relating to the seismic data readings?
Are you also aware the seismic reading for WTC 7 was only 0.6, which was the equivalent to a jack hammer being used in the street. How did a 47 story building "alleged" to have collapsed, only to register a 0.6 seismic reading?
You really need to educate yourself and read - Where Did The Towers Go? book about all this evidence and more by Dr. Judy Wood. She took all her evidence to court, for a request of correction for fraud. Neither Steven E. Jones or Richard Gage have done that. And they never will.
Regarding the "alleged" 4 plane crashes, no large boeing planes hit either of the WTC towers, or crashed at the Pentagon or crashed in a field in Shanksville on 9/11. At all 4 plane events on 9/11, there was spikes in the Earth's magnetic fields, indicating the plane holes were made by a directed energy weapon, which distrupted the Erath's magnetic field. This was also the case for the destruction of the WTC towers also.
It was also NOT a hot/heat event, it was a cold event. No paper was burnt.
Regards the planes, people were observing a black budge 3D volumetric image projection stealth technology, where people observed planes which were not solid, but merely either a cloaked projection, a projected plane image from an external air vehicle. To back this up is, there was a lack of Newtion 3rd laws of physics observed in the UA715 videos, of the plane crashing into the building, and also anomalies with the aircraft itself, such as missing wings and impossible aircraft speeds at sea level.
So I have studied pretty much ALL aspects of 9/11, but I mainly keep my articles focused on the 4 aircrafts and what went down with them, being as Dr Judy Wood has pretty much solved what happened to buildings and how they were destroyed on 9/11, I don't need to write about all that.
I am sure my friend 9/11 Revisionist will be here soon, and I would advise you to read the links he provides you with, if of course you are "really here" to learn and be open-minded to how the towers were destroyed. If not, it is pointless you posting nonsense in my comments section about "thermite" and other nonsense like Richard Gage, when we have proved in spades what a complete and utter liar and disgraceful human being he is, along with Steve E. Jones, and most of the 9/11 Truth Movement talking heads.
Thank you for your good advice. I will attempt to educate myself as I was not aware of the significance of the seismic readings which up until now I had not considered were unusual because they were comparable to those caused by the free fall of the concrete gravity platform Sleipner A in a Norwegian Fjord which was over 200m deep. Furthermore, since it is well known that all the concrete slabs in the towers were pulverised to a fine dust, a high seismic reading would not be expected anyway. Up to now I had always assumed that the concrete slabs were pulverised by explosive ceiling tiles.
David, take your time to read and understand the information and the evidence. There is no rush, as it took me many years to arrive at this understanding, after being misled by Gage and Jones, and the talking heads.
Alice changed the spelling of her name to an early dutch version, Hoglan.
Six months prior to the attack, at 51, she gave birth to triplet boys, Harrison, Garrett and Bryce as a surrogate for her younger brother Vaughn and his wife, Kathy Hoglan. A year and a half earlier she gave gave birth to a daughter for them, Jillian.
At 19 Alice gave birth to Mark, an only child, and was divorced from Mark's father, Gerald at 21.
I suspect Mark doesnt exist. She had 5 kids as a surrogate for her brother and his wife yet only could pop out Mark for herself.
She made a career out of her, "son", including a gay rugby league style cup, Bingham Cup, LGBT rights and as well stories of his endless "heroism" throughout his life. Yet claims to be a veteran flight attendent with United Airlines. Yet no proof has ever been provided of that.
Kathy Hoglan, formerly Kathy Saratoga, is the wife of Alice younger brother Vaughn.
Those triplet boys, Harrison is a marine, Garrett and Bryce are at West Valley College and Jillian the daughter is earning a graduate business degree in London as of september 10 2021.
According to all known media reports I have seen. Mark was the last person on flight 93.
He overslept on the morning of 911 and had to rush to the airport by a friend, whom he had been staying with, Matthew Hall, who had to drive like a lunatic to get him from manhattan to newark arriving outside terminal A at 7:40am.
He sprang out of the car hauling an old blue and gold canvas duffle bag (Berkeley UC colours) ran to Gate 17, down the jetway and board the boeing 757 and sat in 4D just behind the cockpit. Then he called Matthew on a cell phone, "hey its me. Thanks for driving so crazy to get me here. Im in first class sipping a glass of orange juice."
Yet when speaking to his "mother," referred to himself in 3rd person. Maybe Mark is real but Alice aint the mother. She help give her younger Brother, Vaughn and his wife kathy 4 kids via surrogate. 3 triplet boys, six months prior to attacks and 1 girl that was a full one year and a half years prior to attacks.
There is just something not right with her body language...
Flight 93 (Shanksville) Mark Bingham's mom
Mom, Alice Hoglan Is "Delighted" On The Sept 12, Today Show
Video: https://rumble.com/v4rvzpe-flight-93-shanksville-mark-binghams-mom.html
I totally agree with you. She does not exhibit the presentation of grief and loss of someone who lost their son 24 hours earlier. The fact she worked for United Airlines as a Flight Attendant also raises a lot suspicion for me, as I know the military had plans for hijacking simulation scenarios for June 2002 (Amalgam Virgo 02) which included using real Delta Airline employees in a hijacking live-fly situation and the use of FBI agents also.
There seems to be a lot of "duper's delight" whilst she's talking...
Yes, there is. It is very scripted also.
Additional footage of Alice fyi. https://rumble.com/v56co7x-911-passenger-mark-binghams-mom-was-laughing-about....html
What a joke. Maybe the orchestrators of 9/11 were the pioneers of parading apparently happy relatives of victims in front of national TV because you saw the same kind of thing happening years later after the alleged mass shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
O, I would love to hear your thoughts on this article of mine.
The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower
Firefighters Raul Angulo and Erik Lawyer explained the holes in the narrative on Redacted, yet they are withholding important evidence about their fellow firefighters.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-forgotten-firefighters-of-stairwell
Thanx for the link.
Listening to his loooong podcast now, he might be talking about DEW, but he's still stuck on the B/S thermite narrative as well as the CGI narrative with regards to the planes, which are the second layer to the cover-up pertaining to the impossible plane physics.
I left him a couple of messages, maybe he will correct some of his thinking...
Here are some more duper delight examples for you to enjoy...
Richard Gage, Sept 2023: https://rumble.com/v5az6od-dupers-delight-a-911-truther-talking-head-case-study.html
Greg Jenkins - https://rumble.com/v5b3f9x-exposed-greg-jenkins-dupers-delight.html
Thanks for inviting me to comment. You should be aware that I know the towers were not brought down by jet fuel fires. Mark Conlon and Jane Cena's good work have also convinced me that neither of the two aircraft that allegedly crashed into the towers actually did so. However, I'm pretty sure that pretty large flying objects went in and started fires because there were huge holes in the sides of the buildings and smoke was billowing out of them and people could be seen sitting in the broken windows at the extremities trying to get fresh air to breath. The fact that no-one in the stairwells heard explosions doesn't mean they didn't happen because those stairwells are enclosed by thick concrete walls that may well have muffled the sound of the demolition charges. As for your contention that thermite wasn't used to destroy critical structural columns, I can only assume that you hold that belief because you have not studied the structural design of the central columns as I have. As an engineer involved with the offshore oil and gas industry for over 40 years, I am very familiar with heavy steel structure designs and the massive redundancy built into them. So I know there is no way those towers could have been brought down so quickly without removing multiple sections of the main central columns SIMULTANEOUSLY. I therefore am pretty much convinced that thermite charges were attached to those columns on every floor and that these were probably attached during the elevator upgrade that was carried out shortly before 9/11. As regards the pulverisation of the concrete slabs at each level, I believe that Richard Gage's theory of superthermite coated ceiling panels is the most plausible explanation. There are maintenance records that show that nearly every ceiling had its tiles replaced in the years prior to 9/11.
HI David
I sincerely hope you will apply some intellectual humility, especially after reading Mark's comment to you and that you will work through what I have to share with you as well.
It seems you've drunk too much of Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth's kool-aid...
You need to go back to 2005, where the 9/11 disinformation movement was formed, to steer good intentioned truth seekers AWAY from truth. Read:
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
After reading the above article, you should already see through the bullshit that is architects for an engineered truth and the truth-traitor and FRAUDSTER Richard Gage...
"As an engineer involved with the offshore oil and gas industry for over 40 years, I am very familiar with heavy steel structure designs and the massive redundancy built into them."
It seems with all your experience, you don't seem to know the basic difference between a structural failure, a conventional controlled demolition and that of a molecular disintegration of a building. I suggest you read the following article and that you listen to my presentation...
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
Dismantling the 9/11 Collapse & Controlled Demolition Theories
Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative
Presentation: https://rumble.com/v6td6ld-dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled-demolition-on-911.html
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter.
(Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented.
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Read their court filings.
Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone
Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline – Prof David A, Hughes
Given the massive amount of evidence calling the official "9/11" narrative into question, why won't academia ask any critical questions?
Read the peer reviewed paper here: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/911-truth-and-the-silence-of-the
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Thanks for all those links which I will try to thoroughly review. I expect that it will take me some time so I will refrain from making any further comments until I have fully understood them.
Great to hear that you will take the time to work through it.
I'm more than willing to have a face to face discussion if you have any more questions, after doing your due diligence.
I look forward to getting your feedback.
Hello David,
WHY are you here promoting a known liar Richard Gage?
As a matter of fact, I have studied the destruction of ALL 7 WTC buildings on 9/11, and most likely in far more depth than yourself.
Neither WTC 1 or 2 buildings were destroyed by fires, jet fuel or an induced global collapse. Neither was they destroyed by thermite or a controlled demolition.
David, I do not hold any "beliefs" I only follow the "evidence" and have "knowledge" not "beliefs" of how "ALL 7" buildings were destroyed on 9/11 not just 3.
Thermite had nothing to do with how the towers were destroyed, this lie was propagated by another known liar Steve E. jones, who has done work for the government, such as the Department of Energy. Steve E. Jones was also involved and key to covering up Cold Fusion, which proved free energy. Thermite was a deliberate cover-story, to cover-up what really destroyed the towers, turning them into dust from the top down.
Please understand and be aware that 85% to 90% of both WTC towers were missing, because they were turned to dust, and did not hit the ground. Observable video and photographic evidence shows this to be a fact (not a belief). In photos and videos on 9/11, there was hardly any rubble pile to be observed, which was only about to the WTC lobby level.
The towers turning to dust from the top down is also proven by the seismic data readings for both WTC 1 & 2, which were 2.3 and 2.1, which is completely inconsistent with what we should expect of those two buildings. Also, the seismic data proves a controlled demolition or global collapse was not involved. The evidential indicator for this is the seismic readings did not contain S or P waves? Question; Do you understand the significance of this information relating to the seismic data readings?
Are you also aware the seismic reading for WTC 7 was only 0.6, which was the equivalent to a jack hammer being used in the street. How did a 47 story building "alleged" to have collapsed, only to register a 0.6 seismic reading?
You really need to educate yourself and read - Where Did The Towers Go? book about all this evidence and more by Dr. Judy Wood. She took all her evidence to court, for a request of correction for fraud. Neither Steven E. Jones or Richard Gage have done that. And they never will.
Regarding the "alleged" 4 plane crashes, no large boeing planes hit either of the WTC towers, or crashed at the Pentagon or crashed in a field in Shanksville on 9/11. At all 4 plane events on 9/11, there was spikes in the Earth's magnetic fields, indicating the plane holes were made by a directed energy weapon, which distrupted the Erath's magnetic field. This was also the case for the destruction of the WTC towers also.
It was also NOT a hot/heat event, it was a cold event. No paper was burnt.
Regards the planes, people were observing a black budge 3D volumetric image projection stealth technology, where people observed planes which were not solid, but merely either a cloaked projection, a projected plane image from an external air vehicle. To back this up is, there was a lack of Newtion 3rd laws of physics observed in the UA715 videos, of the plane crashing into the building, and also anomalies with the aircraft itself, such as missing wings and impossible aircraft speeds at sea level.
So I have studied pretty much ALL aspects of 9/11, but I mainly keep my articles focused on the 4 aircrafts and what went down with them, being as Dr Judy Wood has pretty much solved what happened to buildings and how they were destroyed on 9/11, I don't need to write about all that.
I am sure my friend 9/11 Revisionist will be here soon, and I would advise you to read the links he provides you with, if of course you are "really here" to learn and be open-minded to how the towers were destroyed. If not, it is pointless you posting nonsense in my comments section about "thermite" and other nonsense like Richard Gage, when we have proved in spades what a complete and utter liar and disgraceful human being he is, along with Steve E. Jones, and most of the 9/11 Truth Movement talking heads.
So please study more of the evidence!
Regards!
Thank you for your good advice. I will attempt to educate myself as I was not aware of the significance of the seismic readings which up until now I had not considered were unusual because they were comparable to those caused by the free fall of the concrete gravity platform Sleipner A in a Norwegian Fjord which was over 200m deep. Furthermore, since it is well known that all the concrete slabs in the towers were pulverised to a fine dust, a high seismic reading would not be expected anyway. Up to now I had always assumed that the concrete slabs were pulverised by explosive ceiling tiles.
David, take your time to read and understand the information and the evidence. There is no rush, as it took me many years to arrive at this understanding, after being misled by Gage and Jones, and the talking heads.
Regards!
His name appears to be Mark Kendall Bingham, I’ve read. Weird that his headstone says Gerald “Mark” Bingham.
Badly scripted in retrospect, including Matt & Katy, but they got all their talking points in…
“I’m just delighted at the rebirth of patriotism…overcoming the hatred…”
Talk about yanking the leash; basic human rights drifting off with the dust that once was the WTC complex.
Big time F’d up.
Alice changed the spelling of her name to an early dutch version, Hoglan.
Six months prior to the attack, at 51, she gave birth to triplet boys, Harrison, Garrett and Bryce as a surrogate for her younger brother Vaughn and his wife, Kathy Hoglan. A year and a half earlier she gave gave birth to a daughter for them, Jillian.
At 19 Alice gave birth to Mark, an only child, and was divorced from Mark's father, Gerald at 21.
I suspect Mark doesnt exist. She had 5 kids as a surrogate for her brother and his wife yet only could pop out Mark for herself.
https://archive.is/zNDsn
She made a career out of her, "son", including a gay rugby league style cup, Bingham Cup, LGBT rights and as well stories of his endless "heroism" throughout his life. Yet claims to be a veteran flight attendent with United Airlines. Yet no proof has ever been provided of that.
Kathy Hoglan, formerly Kathy Saratoga, is the wife of Alice younger brother Vaughn.
Those triplet boys, Harrison is a marine, Garrett and Bryce are at West Valley College and Jillian the daughter is earning a graduate business degree in London as of september 10 2021.
According to all known media reports I have seen. Mark was the last person on flight 93.
He overslept on the morning of 911 and had to rush to the airport by a friend, whom he had been staying with, Matthew Hall, who had to drive like a lunatic to get him from manhattan to newark arriving outside terminal A at 7:40am.
He sprang out of the car hauling an old blue and gold canvas duffle bag (Berkeley UC colours) ran to Gate 17, down the jetway and board the boeing 757 and sat in 4D just behind the cockpit. Then he called Matthew on a cell phone, "hey its me. Thanks for driving so crazy to get me here. Im in first class sipping a glass of orange juice."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/dec/02/september11.terrorism1
Yet when speaking to his "mother," referred to himself in 3rd person. Maybe Mark is real but Alice aint the mother. She help give her younger Brother, Vaughn and his wife kathy 4 kids via surrogate. 3 triplet boys, six months prior to attacks and 1 girl that was a full one year and a half years prior to attacks.
Suspicious.
I dunno, maybe he's the one who shot down the plane…
“FLT93” is obviously FAKE, what does it take to get people to see the obvious?