29 Comments
User's avatar
Mark Conlon's avatar

The most obnoxious wrong piece of plane debris evidence is in this article I wrote here: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/was-the-wrong-plane-debris-planted

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

So many layers to the onion which is 9/11, in order to distract people away of what really happened to 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001.

Another stellar article that normies and debunkers need to read.

Can't wait till you finish your book...

Steve's avatar

I second that! I, for one, will be one of the first to be buying it!

Paul birkbeck's avatar

Same here,can't wait for marks book, I was a remote hijacking guy since 2005 my beliefs got me in trouble way back ( electronic harrasment) but since following marks work which I always look forward to him putting new information out I'm now off the belief we were bamboozled with technology years beyond the general public also from my own experience of the technology they used to harras me I know they possess mind bending technology which I call technosorcery/technowitchcraft were ancient magic and technology are intermixed to maximum effect.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 29, 2025
Comment removed
Mark Conlon's avatar

Hi, This article I wrote here, indicates what I have suspected for some years, that some passengers were real, and others fictional.

9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Oddities:

https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-victims-compensation-fund-oddities

Stephen Verchinski's avatar

Nothing made sense for the forensics. Normally the NTSB would log ALL components, including the engine. Why stop doing that here?

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Because the planes were an illusion...

9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI

Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?

Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection

Podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html

the NSA sucks dick 24/7's avatar

Yup. There were no planes.

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Ok, so if there were no planes, what did people take pictures of, video of and see in the sky? Because people really captured something resembling a plane, it wasn’t any video fakery or CGI… It was a real time IFO/IAP

the NSA sucks dick 24/7's avatar

Where'd you see those videos, on TV? 🤦‍♂️🤣🤣🤣🤣

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Many, many, many personal videos made it's way to the internet over the years and they have been analysed.

Richard D Hall’s 3D Analysis of AA Flight 175, brings up more questions about the WTC Planes, and what they really were.

9/11 WTC Planes – 3D Video Analysis

Link: https://rumble.com/v53lv92-911-wtc-planes-3d-video-analysis.html

Give it a watch. I doubt you've ever seen it...

Stephen Verchinski's avatar

Which again points back to weapons and or demolition materials used to take down the towers. Did that Mossad explosives expert caught by the FBI on 9-11 and then released ever resurface after he returned to Israel?

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

The Mossad guys in the van were patsies, to later help bolster the the truther bombs took down the buildings, bullshit narrative.

Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!

What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks

Bob, the Free Radical's avatar

there were no airliners

therefore NO foundation for DHS/TSA . . .

total waste of taxpayer $$$

Oscar's avatar

Great justification for the MIC profit machine though

Paul birkbeck's avatar

This is operation northwoods on steroids and they had years to perfect it, I honestly think the 1993 wtc bombing was never meant to bring them down it was to show the world that they were a target so when 2001 happened people bought into the official story

Mark Conlon's avatar

Yes, good point Paul. Also note the year numbers,1993 relevant in 9/11 - [19] and [93].

Paul birkbeck's avatar

Well spotted mark I never made that connection about 19 and 93, here is some pop music connections which I made, the spice Girls 1995/6 2 become 1 the music video is in manhattan and the twins appear in it and 2 towers became 1. Also 1993 sade cherish the day music video she is in manhattan on top of sky scraper with lots of 911 symbolism, Susan vega 1998 book and cover blatant symbolism and finally Depeche mode enjoy the silence wtc 1990 video a helicopter goes over the towers at the end and the angle makes it look like only 1 tower is there, but Susan vega takes the top prize

Oscar's avatar

And the twin towers were a giant 11 ;)

Bob, the Free Radical's avatar

No airliner ever flown could have crashed in the manner alleged on 9/11/2001

mari's avatar

Hmm..so many questions

the NSA sucks dick 24/7's avatar

There were no planes.

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

That statement, makes no statement whatsoever...

Chris Wilkerson's avatar

👍

Paul birkbeck's avatar

Great article mark, it looks like those "passengers" and crew were agents or fictional creations, the alternative that they were killed elsewhere is to nasty to contemplate but possible

Don DeCendes's avatar

Ya, . . . well DUH . . . or something - the whole airliner crash story is an insult to human intelligence.

Natalie's avatar

It wasn’t from either plane.

TVO's avatar

What the????!!!!😳💥

User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 29, 2025Edited
Comment removed
Paul birkbeck's avatar

What do you think happened to passengers or were they agents/ fictional characters