From the Colombia Disaster to Project Blue Beam and 9/11

Exposing the Perception Management

I originally wrote this article Monday 28th August 2017, I have updated and added some additional information.

A news article was published online in the Sunday Express, a UK based online newspaper, where they managed to turn a landslide disaster which killed 17 people in Colombia into a "conspiracy theory" hit piece. 

The article made ridiculing references about "conspiracy theorists" in relation to advanced technology "Holograms" and "Project Blue Beam".  

Jon Austin its author of this indirect “hit-piece” article, felt the need to use this terrible landslide disaster (which killed 17 people and displaced many from their homes), and the religious beliefs of a "light formation" which they interpreted to be an apparition of Jesus, to make a "mockery" of the disaster, by portraying anyone who believes in the existence of "Holograms" or "Project Blue Beam" as some sort of tin-foil hat wearing nut-case. I think this says far more about Jon Austin's state of mind than any conspiracy theorists to honest, that he would use such a disaster as an indirect way to mock those who have pursued the existence of advanced 3D volumetric image projection technology. 

I think Jon Austin should examine his own values and beliefs of what really matters when a disaster like this happens and consider the people who have lost their lives and the poor family members left behind who are grieving, whether they believe in Jesus or not, or whether a formation of light brought comfort to them in their time of grief from their interpretation that it was Jesus, rather than his own heartless agenda to focus on "conspiracy theories" instead.

Is there more to the article than meets the eye? "Managing Perceptions"

It seems the article has been combined deliberately to manage people's perceptions when it comes to advanced 3D image projection technology?

Was the article specifically produced because of the growing numbers of people who are now believing that an advanced 3D volumetric "image projection" or "hologram" was used on 9/11 to create the planes in the sky which hit the towers, thus to control people's perceptions regarding anyone who might question the veracity of the 9/11 video evidence of the "planes", implanting a sense of discouragement to believe in such technology, by already deliberately "implanting" a negative perception?

As I have shown in my previous articles over the years, the "video fakery" and “CGI” Psychological Operation was deliberately circulated to conceal such 3D volumetric image projection technology.

More people are now questioning whether or not the "video fakery" explanation to explain the anomalies captured in the videos of United 175, such as the missing wings, tail section and impossible plane speed, are now seeing that some type of 3D volumetric image projection was used on 9/11, and not video fakery or CGI.

Below shows analysis of the Naudet Brothers 2nd plane video footage, which was captured by professional quality video camera. Note: for 6 frames the alleged plane’s wing and tail section disappears.

See below: Slow motion frame-by-frame, showing the disappearing, and then the wing reappearing. [Slow Motion Video Courtesy of Mat at MES].

Also below, the video still image shows the alleged plane’s wings and tail section are captured disappearing in the in the Luc Courchesne video footage, which was also captured by high quality Beta video tape and video camera.

Luc Courchesne’s video was captured from a different direction to the Naudet’s video footage. This rules out that the anomalies being are an artifact from video camera, and compression, or even due to background. This demonstrates that the issues are with the 3D volumetric image projection of the plane itself, which the video cameras captured.

Mat of Math Easy Solutions also put together a study using various other videos of the plane, which also captured the same anomalies with the wings. See below:

Many witnesses reported seeing a small plane, and in some cases some people reported seeing a missile or “rocket”. [Video Courtesy of Mat at MES].

It is most likely that the mixed reports of a small plane, missile or rocket was due to the image projection issue, rather than the camera itself, and would be determined by where the eyewitnesses were located and viewed the plane projection from.

Concluding:

There is no other reasonable explanation for this article of a landslide disaster to have been subtly combined with "conspiracy theories", other than to discourage questioning minds and control people's perceptions in relation to the advanced technology of holograms or image projections and 9/11.

As I have said, the secrecy of this technology makes it a clear and present danger, and the implications for its use in the future in a Project Blue Beam type staged event. Thus why exposing this technology is of the upmost importance, as the powers-that-be will use this illusion technology in the future, if not known in the public’s consciousness, so they know that not everything we see is to be believed, just like the alleged planes on 9/11.

Thanks for reading & caring!